Associate professor, Department of Restorative Sciences, The Dental College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Ga.
Adjunct assistant professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, The Dental College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Ga.
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 May;129(5):696-702. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.07.020. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
Different proportions of tooth width ratios have been evaluated, and the golden proportion is the best known. Although the prevalence of the golden proportion has been evaluated in different ethnic groups and populations, a meta-analysis of these studies is lacking.
The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the existence and suitability of the golden proportion for tooth width ratios and to assess the prevalence of the golden proportion among populations.
A systematic search based on the Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase in January 2021 without any time limitations and included English and non-English-language articles. Additional studies were identified by searching the reference lists of the retrieved articles. Two reviewers independently performed the literature search and data extraction, selecting articles based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eligible studies were selected based on the inclusion criteria, and quality assessments were conducted. Descriptive statistics were applied for a number of outcome measures. Using a meta-analysis software program, data extracted from each selected study were statistically combined by using weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals, and heterogeneity was calculated for each measurement.
A total of 566 articles were retrieved based on the keyword search. After the articles were assessed based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, only 6 articles were included in the meta-analysis.
The outcomes of the review and analyses demonstrate that evidence supporting the existence of the golden proportion in natural smiles is lacking and that the existence of the golden proportion in dentistry is a myth and not a fact. However, the golden percentage theory can be applied with modified percentages that consider critical aspects of esthetic dentistry.
不同比例的牙宽比已经得到了评估,而黄金比例是最著名的。尽管已经在不同的种族和人群中评估了黄金比例的流行程度,但缺乏对这些研究的荟萃分析。
本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是调查黄金比例在牙宽比中的存在和适用性,并评估黄金比例在人群中的流行程度。
根据患者、干预、比较、结果(PICO)和系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,在 2021 年 1 月在 PubMed、Cochrane、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Embase 中进行了系统搜索,没有时间限制,包括英语和非英语语言的文章。通过检索文章的参考文献,还确定了其他研究。两名审查员独立进行文献检索和数据提取,根据纳入和排除标准选择文章。根据纳入标准选择合格的研究,并进行质量评估。应用描述性统计方法对多项结果指标进行评估。使用荟萃分析软件程序,从每个选定的研究中提取的数据通过加权均数差和 95%置信区间进行统计学组合,并计算每个测量的异质性。
根据关键词搜索共检索到 566 篇文章。在根据纳入和排除标准评估文章后,只有 6 篇文章纳入荟萃分析。
综述和分析的结果表明,缺乏支持自然微笑中存在黄金比例的证据,而黄金比例在牙科中的存在是一个神话,而不是事实。然而,黄金比例理论可以应用于考虑到美学牙科关键方面的修改后的百分比。