Liu Judy, Partington Scott, Suh Yeonju, Finiasz Zoe, Flanagan Teresa, Kocher Deanna, Kiely Richard, Kortenaar Michelle, Kushnir Tamar
Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Office of Engagement Initiatives, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 19;12:715914. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715914. eCollection 2021.
Due to the closing of campuses, museums, and other public spaces during the pandemic, the typical avenues for recruitment, partnership, and dissemination are now unavailable to developmental labs. In this paper, we show how a shift in perspective has impacted our lab's ability to successfully transition to virtual work during the COVID-19 shut-down. This begins by recognizing that any lab that relies on local communities to engage in human research is . From this, we introduce a model, and explain how it works using our own activities during the pandemic as an example. To begin, we introduce the vocabulary of mission-driven community organizations and show how we applied the key ideas of mission, vision, and culture to discussions of our own lab's identity. We contrast the community-engaged lab model with a traditional bi-directional model of recruitment and dissemination communities and describe how the community-engaged model can be used to reframe these and other ordinary lab activities. Our activities during the pandemic serve as a case study: we formed new community partnerships, engaged with child "citizen-scientists" in online research, and opened new avenues of virtual programming. One year later, we see modest but quantifiable impact of this approach: a return to pre-pandemic diversity in our samples, new engagement opportunities for trainees, and new sustainable partnerships. We end by discussing the promise and limitations of the community-engaged lab model for the future of developmental research.
由于疫情期间校园、博物馆和其他公共场所关闭,发展实验室以往用于招募、合作和传播的常规途径如今已无法使用。在本文中,我们展示了视角的转变如何影响了我们实验室在新冠疫情封锁期间成功过渡到虚拟工作的能力。首先要认识到,任何依赖当地社区参与人类研究的实验室都是……据此,我们引入了一个模型,并以疫情期间我们自己的活动为例解释其运作方式。首先,我们介绍使命驱动型社区组织的相关词汇,并展示我们如何将使命、愿景和文化的关键理念应用于讨论我们实验室自身的身份认同。我们将社区参与型实验室模式与传统的双向招募和传播模式进行对比,并描述社区参与型模式如何用于重新构建这些以及其他常规实验室活动。我们在疫情期间的活动作为一个案例研究:我们建立了新的社区伙伴关系,让儿童“公民科学家”参与在线研究,并开辟了新的虚拟项目途径。一年后,我们看到了这种方法产生的适度但可量化的影响:样本多样性恢复到疫情前水平,为实习生带来了新的参与机会,以及建立了新的可持续伙伴关系。最后,我们讨论了社区参与型实验室模式对发展研究未来的前景和局限性。