Zhu Qiuhua, Yang Shimei, Zeng Wenbin, Li Mingjie, Guan Zebing, Zhou Lanlan, Wang Hong, Liu Yanan, Gao Yanmin, Qiu Shiqiu, Chen Chaolun, Li Huan, Zheng Shanshan, Yuan Yuemei, Zhang Hanling, Pan Xueyi
Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangdong, China.
Front Oncol. 2021 Aug 18;11:701539. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.701539. eCollection 2021.
This real-world, observational study aimed to assess and compare the clinical efficacy and safety of eltrombopag with recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) in the treatment of chemotherapy induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) in patients with lymphoma. One hundred and fifty-three patients who experienced grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia after chemotherapy for lymphoma were enrolled, 51 of which were treated with eltrombopag, 50 with rhTPO, and 52 patients with no drug treatment were served as the control group. The lowest platelet level and mean platelet counts at Day 5, Day 7, and Day 10 were significantly higher in both the eltrombopag group (P=.041,.003,.000,.000) and rhTPO group (P=.005,.005,.000,.000) than the control, but there was no difference between treatment with eltrombopag and rhTPO. Similarly, days required for the recovery of platelet counts to ≥50×10/L and ≥75×10/L were not different between the two treatment groups but significantly higher than the control group (P <.05). Rates of bleeding and platelet transfusion were all significantly reduced in patients treated with eltrombopag (P=.031,.032) or rhTPO (P=.017,.009) when compared to the control. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 7 (13.7%) and 6 (12.0%) patients in the eltrombopag and rhTPO groups, respectively, all being mild and transient in nature. In conclusion, both eltrombopag and rhTPO were effective and safe in the treatment of thrombocytopenia after chemotherapy for lymphoma.
这项真实世界的观察性研究旨在评估和比较艾曲泊帕与重组人血小板生成素(rhTPO)在治疗淋巴瘤患者化疗所致血小板减少症(CIT)中的临床疗效和安全性。招募了153例淋巴瘤化疗后出现3级或4级血小板减少症的患者,其中51例接受艾曲泊帕治疗,50例接受rhTPO治疗,52例未接受药物治疗的患者作为对照组。艾曲泊帕组(P = 0.041、0.003、0.000、0.000)和rhTPO组(P = 0.005、0.005、0.000、0.000)在第5天、第7天和第10天的最低血小板水平和平均血小板计数均显著高于对照组,但艾曲泊帕治疗与rhTPO治疗之间无差异。同样,两组治疗组血小板计数恢复至≥50×10⁹/L和≥75×10⁹/L所需的天数无差异,但均显著高于对照组(P < 0.05)。与对照组相比,接受艾曲泊帕(P = 0.031、0.032)或rhTPO(P = 0.017、0.009)治疗的患者出血和血小板输注率均显著降低。艾曲泊帕组和rhTPO组分别有7例(13.7%)和6例(12.0%)患者报告了与治疗相关的不良事件(AE),均为轻度且短暂性。总之,艾曲泊帕和rhTPO在治疗淋巴瘤化疗后血小板减少症方面均有效且安全。