• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从公共卫生紧急事件中的 COVID-19 接触者追踪中吸取的经验教训:一项前瞻性实施研究。

Lessons Learned From COVID-19 Contact Tracing During a Public Health Emergency: A Prospective Implementation Study.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States.

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 20;9:721952. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.721952. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2021.721952
PMID:34490198
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8417826/
Abstract

Contact tracing is a core element of the public health response to emerging infectious diseases including COVID-19. Better understanding the implementation context of contact tracing for pandemics, including individual- and systems-level predictors of success, is critical to preparing for future epidemics. We carried out a prospective implementation study of an emergency volunteer contact tracing program established in New Haven, Connecticut between April 4 and May 19, 2020. We assessed the yield and timeliness of case and contact outreach in reference to CDC benchmarks, and identified individual and programmatic predictors of successful implementation using multivariable regression models. We synthesized our findings using the RE-AIM implementation framework. Case investigators interviewed only 826 (48%) of 1,705 cases and were unable to reach 545 (32%) because of incomplete information and 334 (20%) who missed or declined repeated outreach calls. Contact notifiers reached just 687 (28%) of 2,437 reported contacts, and were unable to reach 1,597 (66%) with incomplete information and 153 (6%) who missed or declined repeated outreach calls. The median time-to-case-interview was 5 days and time-to-contact-notification 8 days. However, among notified contacts with complete time data, 457 (71%) were reached within 6 days of exposure. The least likely groups to be interviewed were elderly (adjusted relative risk, aRR 0.74, 95% CI 0.61-0.89, = 0.012, vs. young adult) and Black/African-American cases (aRR 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.97, pairwise = 0.01, vs. Hispanic/Latinx). However, ties between cases and their contacts strongly influenced contact notification success (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) 0.60). Surging caseloads and high volunteer turnover (case investigator = 144, median time from sign-up to retirement from program was 4 weeks) required the program to supplement the volunteer workforce with paid public health nurses. An emergency volunteer-run contact tracing program fell short of CDC benchmarks for time and yield, largely due to difficulty collecting the information required for outreach to cases and contacts. To improve uptake, contact tracing programs must professionalize the workforce; better integrate testing and tracing services; capitalize on positive social influences between cases and contacts; and address racial and age-related disparities through enhanced community engagement.

摘要

接触者追踪是应对包括 COVID-19 在内的新发传染病的公共卫生应对的核心要素。更好地了解大流行期间接触者追踪的实施情况,包括成功的个体和系统水平预测因素,对于为未来的传染病流行做好准备至关重要。我们对 2020 年 4 月 4 日至 5 月 19 日在康涅狄格州纽黑文市建立的紧急志愿者接触者追踪计划进行了前瞻性实施研究。我们根据疾病预防控制中心的基准评估了病例和接触者外展的效果和及时性,并使用多变量回归模型确定了成功实施的个体和计划预测因素。我们使用 RE-AIM 实施框架综合了我们的研究结果。病例调查员仅对 1705 例病例中的 826 例(48%)进行了访谈,由于信息不完整和 545 例(32%)错过了或拒绝了重复的外展电话,无法联系到 334 例(20%)。联系人通知者仅联系到报告的 2437 名接触者中的 687 名(28%),由于信息不完整和 153 名(6%)错过了或拒绝了重复的外展电话,无法联系到 1597 名(66%)。病例访谈的中位数时间为 5 天,接触者通知的中位数时间为 8 天。然而,在有完整时间数据的通知接触者中,457 名(71%)在暴露后 6 天内被联系到。最不可能接受访谈的人群是老年人(调整后的相对风险,aRR 0.74,95%CI 0.61-0.89, = 0.012,vs.年轻成年人)和黑人/非裔美国人病例(aRR 0.88,95%CI 0.80-0.97,两两比较 = 0.01,vs.西班牙裔/拉丁裔)。然而,病例与其接触者之间的联系强烈影响了接触者通知的成功率(组内相关系数(ICC)0.60)。病例数激增和志愿者高流动率(病例调查员 = 144,从注册到退出计划的中位时间为 4 周)要求该计划补充志愿者劳动力,增加了公共卫生护士的报酬。一个由紧急志愿者管理的接触者追踪计划未能达到疾病预防控制中心规定的时间和效果基准,主要是因为难以收集与病例和接触者外展相关的信息。为了提高参与度,接触者追踪计划必须使劳动力专业化;更好地整合检测和追踪服务;利用病例和接触者之间的积极社会影响;并通过加强社区参与来解决种族和年龄相关的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41a4/8417826/27ee60371622/fpubh-09-721952-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41a4/8417826/b604887666a5/fpubh-09-721952-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41a4/8417826/f38b36dd4b69/fpubh-09-721952-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41a4/8417826/27ee60371622/fpubh-09-721952-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41a4/8417826/b604887666a5/fpubh-09-721952-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41a4/8417826/f38b36dd4b69/fpubh-09-721952-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41a4/8417826/27ee60371622/fpubh-09-721952-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Lessons Learned From COVID-19 Contact Tracing During a Public Health Emergency: A Prospective Implementation Study.从公共卫生紧急事件中的 COVID-19 接触者追踪中吸取的经验教训:一项前瞻性实施研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 20;9:721952. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.721952. eCollection 2021.
2
Implementation of a volunteer contact tracing program for COVID-19 in the United States: A qualitative focus group study.美国实施 COVID-19 志愿者接触者追踪计划:一项定性焦点小组研究。
PLoS One. 2021 May 5;16(5):e0251033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251033. eCollection 2021.
3
Design, Implementation, and Outcomes of a Volunteer-Staffed Case Investigation and Contact Tracing Initiative at an Urban Academic Medical Center.设计、实施和评估城市学术医疗中心的志愿者主导的病例调查和接触者追踪计划。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2232110. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.32110.
4
COVID-19 Case Investigation and Contact Tracing in the US, 2020.2020 年美国 COVID-19 病例调查和接触者追踪。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2115850. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15850.
5
Evaluation of the New York City COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing program: a cascade of care analysis.评估纽约市 COVID-19 病例调查和接触者追踪计划:关怀级联分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 29;24(1):2356. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19838-3.
6
Centering Health Equity Within COVID-19 Contact Tracing: Connecticut's Community Outreach Specialist Program.将公平置于新冠疫情接触者追踪的中心:康涅狄格州的社区外展专家项目。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022;28(6):728-738. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001608.
7
COVID-19 Case Investigation and Contact Tracing Efforts from Health Departments - United States, June 25-July 24, 2020.美国 2020 年 6 月 25 日至 7 月 24 日期间,卫生部门开展的 COVID-19 病例调查和接触者追踪工作。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Jan 22;70(3):83-87. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7003a3.
8
Lessons Learned from the Launch and Implementation of the COVID-19 Contact Tracing Program in New York City: a Qualitative Study.从纽约市 COVID-19 接触者追踪计划的启动和实施中吸取的教训:一项定性研究。
J Urban Health. 2024 Oct;101(5):888-897. doi: 10.1007/s11524-024-00898-0. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
9
COVID-19 Case Investigation and Contact Tracing: Early Lessons Learned and Future Opportunities.COVID-19 病例调查和接触者追踪:早期经验教训和未来机会。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2021 Jan/Feb;27 Suppl 1, COVID-19 and Public Health: Looking Back, Moving Forward:S87-S97. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001290.
10
COVID-19 Contact Tracing Outcomes in Washington State, August and October 2020.2020 年 8 月和 10 月华盛顿州的 COVID-19 接触者追踪结果。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 26;9:782296. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.782296. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
An Examination of Responses to COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Efforts in Black/African American and Hispanic/Latinx Communities of Los Angeles.对洛杉矶黑人/非裔美国人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔社区新冠病毒接触者追踪工作回应的考察
Health Equity. 2024 Aug 7;8(1):493-504. doi: 10.1089/heq.2023.0243. eCollection 2024.
2
A Retrospective Analysis of Jordan's National COVID-19 Call Center: Operations, Effectiveness, and Lessons Learned.约旦国家新冠疫情呼叫中心的回顾性分析:运营、成效及经验教训
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Nov 8;17:5079-5089. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S475335. eCollection 2024.
3
Development of a University-Government Partnership for Public Health Response and Workforce Development in the State of Oregon.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 Case Investigation and Contact Tracing in the US, 2020.2020 年美国 COVID-19 病例调查和接触者追踪。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2115850. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15850.
2
Implementation of a volunteer contact tracing program for COVID-19 in the United States: A qualitative focus group study.美国实施 COVID-19 志愿者接触者追踪计划:一项定性焦点小组研究。
PLoS One. 2021 May 5;16(5):e0251033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251033. eCollection 2021.
3
COVID-19 Case Investigation and Contact Tracing in Central Washington State, June-July 2020.
俄勒冈州公共卫生应对与劳动力发展中的大学-政府伙伴关系的建立
J Community Health. 2024 Oct;49(5):779-784. doi: 10.1007/s10900-024-01352-7. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
4
Looking under the lamp-post: quantifying the performance of contact tracing in the United States during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.在灯柱下观察:量化 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间美国接触者追踪的表现。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 23;24(1):595. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18012-z.
5
Evaluation of the implementation of a community health worker-led COVID-19 contact tracing intervention in Chiapas, Mexico, from March 2020 to December 2021.评价 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 12 月在墨西哥恰帕斯州实施的由社区卫生工作者主导的 COVID-19 接触者追踪干预措施。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 18;24(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10590-3.
6
Evaluating the impact on health outcomes of an event that resulted in a delay in contact tracing of COVID-19 cases in England, September 2020: an observational study.评估 2020 年 9 月在英格兰,因新冠病毒病例接触者追踪延迟而导致的事件对健康结果的影响:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 12;13(10):e064982. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064982.
7
Interplay of demographics, geography and COVID-19 pandemic responses in the Puget Sound region: The Vashon, Washington Medical Reserve Corps experience.人口统计学、地理位置和 COVID-19 大流行应对措施在普吉特海湾地区的相互作用:华盛顿州沃申市医疗后备队的经验。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 16;18(8):e0274345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274345. eCollection 2023.
8
Implementing strategies to prevent infections in acute-care settings.实施急性护理环境中感染预防策略。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Aug;44(8):1232-1246. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.103. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
9
Integrating Contact Tracers Into Point-of-Care Testing Workflow to Accelerate the Tracing of People With Exposure to COVID-19, August-December 2020, New York City.将接触者追踪员纳入即时检测工作流程,以加快对与 COVID-19 暴露者的追踪,2020 年 8 月至 12 月,纽约市。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2023;29(5):708-717. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001748. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
10
Retrospective, Observational Studies for Estimating Vaccine Effects on the Secondary Attack Rate of SARS-CoV-2.回顾性观察研究估计疫苗对 SARS-CoV-2 二次攻击率的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 2023 Jun 2;192(6):1016-1028. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwad046.
2020 年 6 月至 7 月,华盛顿州中部的 COVID-19 病例调查和接触者追踪。
J Community Health. 2021 Oct;46(5):918-921. doi: 10.1007/s10900-021-00974-5. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
4
Cross-country evidence on the association between contact tracing and COVID-19 case fatality rates.跨国证据表明接触者追踪与 COVID-19 病死率之间的关联。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 25;11(1):2145. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78760-x.
5
COVID-19 Case Investigation and Contact Tracing Efforts from Health Departments - United States, June 25-July 24, 2020.美国 2020 年 6 月 25 日至 7 月 24 日期间,卫生部门开展的 COVID-19 病例调查和接触者追踪工作。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Jan 22;70(3):83-87. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7003a3.
6
Parallels and Mutual Lessons in Tuberculosis and COVID-19 Transmission, Prevention, and Control.结核病和 COVID-19 在传播、预防和控制方面的相似之处和相互借鉴。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;27(3):681-686. doi: 10.3201/eid2703.203456. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
7
Community Trace: Rapid Establishment of a Volunteer Contact Tracing Program for COVID-19.社区追踪:快速建立 COVID-19 志愿者接触者追踪计划。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Jan;111(1):54-57. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305959. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
8
Effectiveness of contact tracing and quarantine on reducing COVID-19 transmission: a retrospective cohort study.接触者追踪和隔离在减少 COVID-19 传播方面的有效性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Public Health. 2020 Dec;189:54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.09.012. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
9
Outcomes of Contact Tracing in San Francisco, California-Test and Trace During Shelter-in-Place.加利福尼亚州旧金山的接触者追踪结果-就地避难期间的检测和追踪。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Mar 1;181(3):381-383. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5670.
10
Contact tracing with digital assistance in Taiwan's COVID-19 outbreak response.台湾 COVID-19 疫情应对中的数字化接触者追踪。
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Dec;101:348-352. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.1483. Epub 2020 Oct 6.