Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy, Munich Center for the Economics of Aging, Munich, Germany.
Université Paris Dauphine - PSL, Leda, Legos, Paris, France.
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Apr;23(3):453-465. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01370-5. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
This paper investigates the causal effect of the amount of formal care used on the informal care received by formal care users. We use an original instrument for formal care volume based on local disparities (NUTS 3 level, 96 units) in the price of formal care. Using the French CARE survey, we use a two-part model to assess the effect of formal care on the extensive and the intensive margin of informal care. An increase in the amount of formal care is found to be associated with a small decrease in the probability of using informal care. Heterogeneity tests show that this negative effect is mainly driven by help for daily activities provided by women. At the intensive margin, informal care is not significantly affected by the amount of formal care. Reforms increasing subsidies for formal care can thus be suspected to have a limited effect on informal care arrangements.
本文研究了使用正式护理的数量对正式护理使用者所接受的非正式护理的因果影响。我们使用了一种基于正式护理价格的当地差异(NUTS3 级别,96 个单位)的正式护理量原始工具。利用法国 CARE 调查,我们使用两部分模型来评估正式护理对非正式护理广泛和密集边际的影响。结果发现,正式护理量的增加与使用非正式护理的概率略有下降有关。异质性检验表明,这种负效应主要是由女性提供的日常活动帮助驱动的。在密集边际上,正式护理量对非正式护理没有显著影响。因此,增加正式护理补贴的改革可能对非正式护理安排的影响有限。