Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Health Econ. 2019 Aug;28(8):984-997. doi: 10.1002/hec.3887. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
There is limited evidence on the relationship between formal and informal care using panel data in a U.K. setting and focused specifically on people living together (co-residents). Using all 18 waves of the British Household Panel Survey (1991-2009), we analyse the effect of informal care given by co-residents on the use of formal home care and health care services more generally. To account for endogeneity, we estimate models using random effects instrumental variable regression using the number of daughters as a source of exogenous variation. We find that a 10% increase in the monthly provision of informal care hours decreases the probability of using home help (formal home care) by 1.02 percentage points (p < .05), equivalent to a 15.62% relative reduction. This effect was larger for home help provided by the state (β = -.117) compared with non-state home help (β = -.044). These results provide evidence that significant increases in the supply of informal care would reduce the demand for home-help provision.
关于在英国环境中使用面板数据的正式和非正式护理之间的关系,目前的证据有限,而且特别关注的是共同居住者(同住者)。我们利用英国住户纵向调查(1991-2009 年)的所有 18 个波次的数据,分析了同住者提供的非正式护理对一般正规家庭护理和医疗服务使用的影响。为了解决内生性问题,我们使用女儿数量作为外生变量来源的随机效应工具变量回归来估计模型。我们发现,每月提供的非正式护理时间增加 10%,使用家庭帮助(正规家庭护理)的概率就会降低 1.02 个百分点(p<.05),相当于相对减少 15.62%。由国家(β=-.117)提供的家庭帮助与非国家(β=-.044)提供的家庭帮助相比,这种效果更大。这些结果提供了证据表明,非正式护理供应量的大幅增加将减少对家庭帮助供应的需求。