BCBL - Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, Donostia, Spain.
Departments of Psychology, Neuroscience, Communication Science and Disorders, Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, and Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, PA.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Sep 14;64(9):3465-3475. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00042. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
Purpose Morse code as a form of communication became widely used for telegraphy, radio and maritime communication, and military operations, and remains popular with ham radio operators. Some skilled users of Morse code are able to comprehend a full sentence as they listen to it, while others must first transcribe the sentence into its written letter sequence. Morse thus provides an interesting opportunity to examine comprehension differences in the context of skilled acoustic perception. Measures of comprehension and short-term memory show a strong correlation across multiple forms of communication. This study tests whether this relationship holds for Morse and investigates its underlying basis. Our analyses examine Morse and speech immediate serial recall, focusing on established markers of echoic storage, phonological-articulatory coding, and lexical-semantic support. We show a relationship between Morse short-term memory and Morse comprehension that is not explained by Morse perceptual fluency. In addition, we find that poorer serial recall for Morse compared to speech is primarily due to poorer item memory for Morse, indicating differences in lexical-semantic support. Interestingly, individual differences in speech item memory are also predictive of individual differences in Morse comprehension. Conclusions We point to a psycholinguistic framework to account for these results, concluding that Morse functions like "reading for the ears" (Maier et al., 2004) and that underlying differences in the integration of phonological and lexical-semantic knowledge impact both short-term memory and comprehension. The results provide insight into individual differences in the comprehension of degraded speech and strategies that build comprehension through listening experience. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.16451868.
目的 摩尔斯电码作为一种通信形式,在电报、无线电和航海通信以及军事行动中得到了广泛应用,并在业余无线电操作员中仍然很流行。一些熟练的摩尔斯电码使用者能够在听到句子的同时理解整句话,而其他人则必须先将句子转录成其书面字母序列。因此,摩尔斯电码为研究熟练的声学感知背景下的理解差异提供了一个有趣的机会。理解和短期记忆的测量在多种通信形式中都有很强的相关性。本研究检验了这种关系是否适用于摩尔斯电码,并探讨了其潜在的基础。我们的分析检验了摩尔斯电码和语音即时序列回忆,重点关注回声存储、语音-发音编码和词汇语义支持的既定标记。我们展示了摩尔斯短期记忆和摩尔斯理解之间的关系,而这种关系不能用摩尔斯感知流畅度来解释。此外,我们发现,与语音相比,摩尔斯的序列回忆较差主要是因为摩尔斯的项目记忆较差,这表明词汇语义支持存在差异。有趣的是,语音项目记忆的个体差异也可以预测摩尔斯理解的个体差异。结论 我们提出了一个心理语言学框架来解释这些结果,得出的结论是,摩尔斯电码的功能类似于“为耳朵阅读”(Maier 等人,2004 年),并且语音和词汇语义知识整合的潜在差异会影响短期记忆和理解。这些结果为理解退化语音的个体差异以及通过听力经验构建理解的策略提供了深入了解。补充材料 https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.16451868.