Emmorey Karen, Giezen Marcel R, Petrich Jennifer A F, Spurgeon Erin, O'Grady Farnady Lucinda
San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182, United States.
San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182, United States.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Jun;177:69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.04.014. Epub 2017 May 5.
This study investigated the relation between linguistic and spatial working memory (WM) resources and language comprehension for signed compared to spoken language. Sign languages are both linguistic and visual-spatial, and therefore provide a unique window on modality-specific versus modality-independent contributions of WM resources to language processing. Deaf users of American Sign Language (ASL), hearing monolingual English speakers, and hearing ASL-English bilinguals completed several spatial and linguistic serial recall tasks. Additionally, their comprehension of spatial and non-spatial information in ASL and spoken English narratives was assessed. Results from the linguistic serial recall tasks revealed that the often reported advantage for speakers on linguistic short-term memory tasks does not extend to complex WM tasks with a serial recall component. For English, linguistic WM predicted retention of non-spatial information, and both linguistic and spatial WM predicted retention of spatial information. For ASL, spatial WM predicted retention of spatial (but not non-spatial) information, and linguistic WM did not predict retention of either spatial or non-spatial information. Overall, our findings argue against strong assumptions of independent domain-specific subsystems for the storage and processing of linguistic and spatial information and furthermore suggest a less important role for serial encoding in signed than spoken language comprehension.
本研究调查了与口语相比,手语的语言和空间工作记忆(WM)资源与语言理解之间的关系。手语兼具语言性和视觉空间性,因此为WM资源对语言处理的模态特异性与模态非特异性贡献提供了一个独特的窗口。美国手语(ASL)的聋人使用者、只会说英语的单语者以及会说ASL和英语的双语者完成了多项空间和语言序列回忆任务。此外,还评估了他们对ASL和英语口语叙述中空间和非空间信息的理解。语言序列回忆任务的结果显示,通常所报道的说话者在语言短期记忆任务上的优势,并不适用于具有序列回忆成分的复杂WM任务。对于英语,语言WM预测了非空间信息的保留,而语言和空间WM都预测了空间信息的保留。对于ASL,空间WM预测了空间(而非非空间)信息的保留,而语言WM并未预测空间或非空间信息的保留。总体而言,我们的研究结果反对对语言和空间信息的存储及处理存在独立的特定领域子系统的强烈假设,并且进一步表明在手语理解中,序列编码的作用不如在口语理解中重要。