• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用难度评分评估腹腔镜肝切除术的学习曲线。

The learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection utilising a difficulty score.

机构信息

Clinical Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.

出版信息

Radiol Oncol. 2021 Sep 6;56(1):111-118. doi: 10.2478/raon-2021-0035.

DOI:10.2478/raon-2021-0035
PMID:34492748
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8884855/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) of a single surgeon.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of liver resections was conducted. 171 patients undergoing pure LLRs between April 2008 and April 2021 were analysed. The Halls difficulty score (HDS) for theoretical predictions of intraoperative complications (IOC) during LLR was applied. IOC was defined as blood loss over 775 mL, unintentional damage to the surrounding structures, and conversion to an open approach. Theoretical association between HDS and the predicted probability of IOC was utilised to objectify the shape of the learning curve.

RESULTS

The obtained learning curve has resulted from thirteen years of surgical effort of a single surgeon. It consists of an absolute and a relative part in the mathematical description of the additive function described by the logarithmic function (absolute complexity) and fifth-degree regression curve (relative complexity). The obtained learning curve determines the functional dependency of the learning outcome versus time and indicates several local extreme values (peaks and valleys) in the learning process until proficiency is achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

This learning curve indicates an ongoing learning process for LLR. The proposed mathematical model can be applied for any surgical procedure with an existing difficulty score and a known theoretically predicted association between the difficulty score and given outcome (for example, IOC).

摘要

背景

本研究旨在定量评估单个外科医生行腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)的学习曲线。

患者与方法

对 2008 年 4 月至 2021 年 4 月期间前瞻性维护的肝切除术数据库进行回顾性分析。共分析了 171 例接受纯腹腔镜肝切除术的患者。应用 Halls 难度评分(HDS)对 LLR 术中并发症(IOC)的理论预测进行评估。IOC 定义为出血量超过 775ml、意外损伤周围结构以及转为开放手术。理论上 HDS 与预测的 IOC 概率之间的关联用于客观地描述学习曲线的形状。

结果

该学习曲线是由一位外科医生经过 13 年的手术努力获得的。它由对数函数(绝对复杂度)和五次回归曲线(相对复杂度)描述的加法函数的绝对和相对部分组成。获得的学习曲线确定了学习成果与时间的功能依赖性,并表明在熟练程度达到之前,学习过程中存在几个局部极值(峰和谷)。

结论

该学习曲线表明 LLR 是一个持续的学习过程。所提出的数学模型可应用于任何具有现有难度评分且已知难度评分与给定结果(例如 IOC)之间存在理论预测关联的手术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6551/8884855/ba598567512e/raon-56-111-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6551/8884855/db032f92c43f/raon-56-111-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6551/8884855/ed0a4a6a0c04/raon-56-111-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6551/8884855/cbe403adb450/raon-56-111-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6551/8884855/ba598567512e/raon-56-111-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6551/8884855/db032f92c43f/raon-56-111-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6551/8884855/ed0a4a6a0c04/raon-56-111-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6551/8884855/cbe403adb450/raon-56-111-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6551/8884855/ba598567512e/raon-56-111-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection utilising a difficulty score.利用难度评分评估腹腔镜肝切除术的学习曲线。
Radiol Oncol. 2021 Sep 6;56(1):111-118. doi: 10.2478/raon-2021-0035.
2
The external validation of a difficulty scoring system for predicting the risk of intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection.用于预测腹腔镜肝切除术中并发症风险的难度评分系统的外部验证
BMC Surg. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0645-y.
3
Prediction of complexity and complications of laparoscopic liver surgery: The comparison of the Halls-score to the IWATE-score in 100 consecutive laparoscopic liver resections.腹腔镜肝手术的复杂性和并发症预测:100 例连续腹腔镜肝切除术中 Halls 评分与岩手评分的比较。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020 Jul;27(7):380-387. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.731. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
4
Evaluating the learning curve for laparoscopic liver resection: a comparative study between standard and learning curve CUSUM.评估腹腔镜肝切除术的学习曲线:标准和学习曲线累积和(CUSUM)比较研究。
HPB (Oxford). 2019 Nov;21(11):1505-1512. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.03.362. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
5
Laparoscopic liver resection: is there a learning curve?腹腔镜肝切除术:是否存在学习曲线?
Dig Surg. 2012;29(1):62-9. doi: 10.1159/000335737. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
6
Risk factors of unplanned intraoperative conversion to hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery or open surgery in laparoscopic liver resection.腹腔镜肝切除术中计划性中转手助腹腔镜手术或开腹手术的危险因素。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Aug;407(5):1961-1969. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02466-z. Epub 2022 Mar 6.
7
Validation of the IWATE criteria as a laparoscopic liver resection difficulty score in a single North American cohort.在北美一个单一队列中验证岩手县标准作为腹腔镜肝切除难度评分的有效性。
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3601-3609. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08561-4. Epub 2021 May 24.
8
Major Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Based on Surgeons' Learning Curve.基于外科医生学习曲线的倾向评分匹配分析:腹腔镜与开腹肝癌切除术的比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Jan;28(1):447-458. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08764-4. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
9
A machine learning analysis of difficulty scoring systems for laparoscopic liver surgery.腹腔镜肝手术难度评分系统的机器学习分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):8869-8880. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09322-7. Epub 2022 May 23.
10
Prediction of surgical outcomes of laparoscopic liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma by defining surgical difficulty.定义手术难度预测腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的手术结局。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5209-5218. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5589-7. Epub 2017 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical Repair of Bile Duct Injuries Due to Cholecystectomy-An Experience from a Referral Center in Slovenia.胆囊切除术后胆管损伤的外科修复——来自斯洛文尼亚一家转诊中心的经验
Life (Basel). 2025 May 29;15(6):874. doi: 10.3390/life15060874.
2
Laparoscopic and Open Distal Pancreatectomy-An Initial Single-Institution Experience with a Propensity Score Matching Analysis.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术——基于倾向评分匹配分析的单机构初步经验
Life (Basel). 2025 Jan 14;15(1):97. doi: 10.3390/life15010097.
3
The impact of obesity on short-term outcomes after the laparoscopic liver resection: a single-institution experience.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the Iwate Model for Predicting the Difficulty of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Does Tumor Size Matter?岩手模型预测腹腔镜肝切除难度的评估:肿瘤大小有影响吗?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Jun;25(6):1451-1460. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04657-9. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
2
Critical appraisal of the learning curve of minimally invasive hepatectomy: experience with the first 200 cases of a Southeast Asian early adopter.微创肝切除术学习曲线的评价:一位东南亚早期采用者的前 200 例经验。
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Jun;90(6):1092-1098. doi: 10.1111/ans.15683. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
3
The external validation of a difficulty scoring system for predicting the risk of intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection.
肥胖对腹腔镜肝切除术后短期结局的影响:单机构经验
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024 Mar;19(1):83-90. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2023.134104. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
4
Towards a Standardization of Learning Curve Assessment in Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery.迈向微创肝脏手术学习曲线评估的标准化
Ann Surg. 2024 Jun 26;281(2):252-64. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006417.
5
Ranking as a Procedure for Selecting a Replacement Variable in the Score Predicting the Survival of Patients Treated with Curative Intent for Colorectal Liver Metastases.排序作为选择有治疗意向的结直肠癌肝转移患者生存评分预测替代变量的一种方法。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Nov 15;59(11):2003. doi: 10.3390/medicina59112003.
6
A novel difficulty scoring system of laparoscopic liver resection for liver tumor.一种用于肝肿瘤腹腔镜肝切除术的新型难度评分系统。
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 29;12:1019763. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1019763. eCollection 2022.
7
Value of 3D printing technology combined with indocyanine green fluorescent navigation in complex laparoscopic hepatectomy.3D 打印技术联合吲哚菁绿荧光导航在复杂腹腔镜肝切除术中的应用价值。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 11;17(8):e0272815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272815. eCollection 2022.
用于预测腹腔镜肝切除术中并发症风险的难度评分系统的外部验证
BMC Surg. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0645-y.
4
Learning Curve in Laparoscopic Liver Resection, Educational Value of Simulation and Training Programmes: A Systematic Review.腹腔镜肝切除术的学习曲线、模拟和培训计划的教育价值:系统评价。
World J Surg. 2019 Nov;43(11):2710-2719. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05111-x.
5
Critical appraisal of predictive tools to assess the difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review.腹腔镜肝切除术难度评估预测工具的评价:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):366-376. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6479-3. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
6
Development and validation of a difficulty score to predict intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection.开发并验证一种难度评分系统,以预测腹腔镜肝切除术中的术中并发症。
Br J Surg. 2018 Aug;105(9):1182-1191. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10821. Epub 2018 May 8.
7
Laparoscopic anatomical liver resection after complex blunt liver trauma: a case report.复杂钝性肝外伤后腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术:一例报告
Surg Case Rep. 2018 Mar 23;4(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40792-018-0432-5.
8
Simultaneous Pure Laparoscopic Resection of Primary Colorectal Cancer and Synchronous Liver Metastases: A Single Institution Experience with Propensity Score Matching Analysis.原发性结直肠癌与同步肝转移瘤的同期纯腹腔镜切除术:单机构倾向评分匹配分析经验
Radiol Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;52(1):42-53. doi: 10.1515/raon-2017-0047. eCollection 2018 Mar.
9
The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery: From Indication to Implementation.《南安普敦腹腔镜肝手术共识指南:从适应证到实施》。
Ann Surg. 2018 Jul;268(1):11-18. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002524.
10
A novel model for prediction of pure laparoscopic liver resection surgical difficulty.一种用于预测纯腹腔镜肝切除术手术难度的新模型。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5356-5363. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5616-8. Epub 2017 Jun 7.