Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Forensic Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Section of Legal Medicine, School of Law, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy.
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Aug 28;2021:1478025. doi: 10.1155/2021/1478025. eCollection 2021.
At the dawn of the fourth industrial revolution, the healthcare industry is experiencing a momentous shift in the direction of increasingly pervasive technologization of care. If, up until the 2000s, imagining healthcare provided by robots was a purely futuristic fantasy, today, such a scenario is in fact a concrete reality, especially in some countries, such as Japan, where nursing care is largely delivered by assistive and social robots in both public and private healthcare settings, as well as in home care. This revolution in the context of care, already underway in many countries and destined to take place soon on a global scale, raises obvious ethical issues, related primarily to the progressive dehumanization of healthcare, a process which, moreover, has undergone an important acceleration following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has made it necessary to devise new systems to deliver healthcare services while minimizing interhuman contact. According to leading industry experts, nurses will be the primary users of healthcare robots in the short term. The aim of this study is to provide a general overview, through a scoping review approach, of the most relevant ethical issues that have emerged in the nursing care field in relation to the increasingly decisive role that service robots play in the provision of care. Specifically, through the adoption of the population-concept-context framework, we formulated this broad question: what are the most relevant ethical issues directly impacting clinical practice that arise in nursing care delivered by assistive and social robots? We conducted the review according to the five-step methodology outlined by Arksey and O'Malley. The first two steps, formulating the main research question and carrying out the literature search, were performed based on the population-context-concept (PCC) framework suggested by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Starting from an initial quota of 2,328 scientific papers, we performed an initial screening through a computer system by eliminating duplicated and non-English language articles. The next step consisted of selection based on a reading of the titles and abstracts, adopting four precise exclusion criteria: articles related to a nonnursing environment, articles dealing with bioethical aspects in a marginal way, articles related to technological devices other than robots, and articles that did not treat the dynamics of human-robot relationships in depth. Of the 2,328 titles and abstracts screened, we included 14. The results of the 14 papers revealed the existence of nonnegligible difficulties in the integration of robotic systems within nursing, leading to a lively search for new theoretical ethical frameworks, in which robots can find a place; concurrent with this exploration are the frantic attempts to identify the best ethical design system applicable to robots who work alongside nurses in hospital wards. In the final part of the paper, we also proposed considerations about the Italian nursing context and the legal implications of nursing care provided by robots in light of the Italian legislative panorama. Regarding future perspectives, this paper offers insights regarding robot engagement strategies within nursing.
在第四次工业革命的曙光下,医疗保健行业正朝着护理日益普及的方向发生重大转变。如果说直到 21 世纪初,想象机器人提供的医疗保健还只是一种纯粹的未来主义幻想,那么如今,这种情况实际上已经成为现实,尤其是在一些国家,如日本,辅助和社交机器人在公共和私人医疗保健环境以及家庭护理中广泛用于护理。在许多国家已经进行的这种护理领域的革命,即将在全球范围内迅速发生,引发了明显的伦理问题,主要涉及医疗保健的逐步非人化,而且,自 COVID-19 大流行爆发以来,这一进程已经加速,这使得有必要设计新的系统来提供医疗保健服务,同时最大限度地减少人际接触。根据领先的行业专家的说法,护士将是短期内在医疗保健机器人方面的主要使用者。本研究旨在通过范围界定审查方法,提供一个总体概述,探讨与服务机器人在提供护理方面的决定性作用相关的护理领域中出现的最相关的伦理问题。具体来说,我们通过采用人口-概念-背景框架,提出了这个广泛的问题:在辅助和社交机器人提供护理方面,直接影响临床实践的最相关伦理问题是什么?我们根据 Arksey 和 O'Malley 提出的五步方法进行了审查。前两个步骤,即提出主要研究问题和进行文献搜索,是根据 Joanna Briggs 研究所建议的人口-背景-概念(PCC)框架进行的。从最初的 2328 篇科学论文开始,我们通过计算机系统进行了初步筛选,剔除了重复和非英语的文章。下一步是根据标题和摘要进行选择,采用四个精确的排除标准:与非护理环境相关的文章、边缘处理生物伦理方面的文章、与机器人以外的技术设备相关的文章以及没有深入探讨人机关系动态的文章。在筛选的 2328 个标题和摘要中,我们纳入了 14 篇。这 14 篇论文的结果表明,在将机器人系统融入护理方面存在不可忽视的困难,这导致了对新的理论伦理框架的积极探索,机器人可以在这些框架中找到自己的位置;与此同时,人们也在疯狂地尝试确定适用于与护士一起在医院病房工作的机器人的最佳伦理设计系统。在论文的最后一部分,我们还根据意大利立法情况,对意大利护理背景和机器人提供护理的法律影响进行了思考。关于未来展望,本文为护理中的机器人参与策略提供了一些见解。