• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1980年至2018年祁连山脉南坡土地利用变化及其驱动力

[Land use change and its driving force on the southern slope of Qilian Mountains from 1980 to 2018].

作者信息

Fu Jian-Xin, Cao Guang-Chao, Guo Wen-Jiong

机构信息

Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Taiyuan Normal University, Jinzhong 030619, Shanxi, China.

Qinghai Province Key Laboratory of Physical Geography and Environmental Process, Qinghai Normal University, Xining 810008, China.

出版信息

Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2020 Aug;31(8):2699-2709. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202008.017.

DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202008.017
PMID:34494793
Abstract

Qilian Mountains is the boundary of the first and second steps of China's terrain, with fragile ecological environment. There is great ecological significance to study land use change and driving force in transitional areas. In this study, we investigated the spatial and temporal characte-ristic of land use and its driving force in the south slope of Qilian Mountains, based on RS image data from 1980 to 2018, with the spatial autocorrelation method, ArcGIS spatial analysis method and principal component analysis. The results showed that, from 1980 to 2018, grassland was the main land use type, and the proportion of construction land was the smallest. Water area and grassland showed a declining trend, while unused land, construction land and farmland showed an increasing trend. There was smaller change for the woodland. The single dynamic degree of different land types decreased following an order of construction land, water, farmland, unused land, woodland and grassland. The comprehensive dynamic degree of land use was 0.9%. The spatial distribution of different land use types showed the characteristics of spatial agglomeration. The increased areas of farmland and the decreased areas of woodland and grassland were mainly distributed in the northwest of the Datong River valley of Menyuan County, while in the upper reaches of Datong River in the northeast of Tianjun County, grassland was occupied by construction land. The driving force of land use was population, science and technology, urbanization, level of economic development, and policies. Our results would support the government to reasonably plan and utilize land resources, which is of significance to the protection of ecological environment and the sustainable development of society and economy on the southern slope of Qilian Mountains.

摘要

祁连山是中国地形一二阶梯的分界线,生态环境脆弱。研究过渡区土地利用变化及其驱动力具有重要的生态意义。本研究基于1980年至2018年的遥感影像数据,运用空间自相关方法、ArcGIS空间分析方法和主成分分析法,对祁连山南坡土地利用及其驱动力的时空特征进行了研究。结果表明,1980年至2018年,草地是主要土地利用类型,建设用地占比最小。水域和草地呈下降趋势,未利用地、建设用地和耕地呈上升趋势。林地变化较小。不同土地类型的单一动态度由大到小依次为建设用地、水域、耕地、未利用地、林地、草地。土地利用综合动态度为0.9%。不同土地利用类型的空间分布呈现出空间集聚特征。耕地增加区和林地、草地减少区主要分布在门源县大通河谷地西北部,而在天峻县东北部大通河上游,草地被建设用地占用。土地利用的驱动力有人口、科技、城镇化、经济发展水平和政策等。研究结果可为政府合理规划和利用土地资源提供支持,对祁连山南坡生态环境保护及社会经济可持续发展具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
[Land use change and its driving force on the southern slope of Qilian Mountains from 1980 to 2018].1980年至2018年祁连山脉南坡土地利用变化及其驱动力
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2020 Aug;31(8):2699-2709. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202008.017.
2
Coupling Coordination Relationship and Driving Mechanism between Urbanization and Ecosystem Service Value in Large Regions: A Case Study of Urban Agglomeration in Yellow River Basin, China.大区域城市化与生态系统服务价值的耦合协调关系及驱动机制——以黄河流域城市群为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 23;18(15):7836. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157836.
3
[Land use change dynamics and driving forces of the vulnerable ecological region in northwestern Shanxi Province, China].[中国山西省西北部脆弱生态区土地利用变化动态及驱动力]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2014 Oct;25(10):2959-67.
4
The trade-offs and synergies of the ecological-production-living functions of grassland in the Qilian mountains by ecological priority.祁连山草地生态-生产-生活功能权衡与协同关系的生态优先导向
J Environ Manage. 2023 Feb 1;327:116883. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116883. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
5
Spatial heterogeneity and driving factors of land use change in the middle and upper reaches of Ganjiang River, southern China.中国南方赣江流域中上游土地利用变化的空间异质性及驱动因素
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2021 Jul;32(7):2545-2554. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202107.016.
6
The dynamic patterns and driving factors of land use conflict in the Yellow River basin of China.中国黄河流域土地利用冲突的动态格局和驱动因素。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Oct;30(50):108649-108666. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29996-3. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
7
Dynamic evolution and scenario simulation of habitat quality under the impact of land-use change in the Huaihe River Economic Belt, China.中国淮河流域经济带土地利用变化下的生境质量动态演变与情景模拟。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 5;16(4):e0249566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249566. eCollection 2021.
8
Temporal and spatial differentiation characteristics of ecosystem service values based on the ecogeographical division of China: a case study in the Yellow River Basin, China.基于中国生态地理分区的生态系统服务价值时空分异特征——以中国黄河流域为例
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(3):8317-8337. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22748-9. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
9
Zoning of Ecological Restoration in the Qilian Mountain Area, China.中国祁连山地区生态恢复的分区。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 25;18(23):12417. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312417.
10
Dynamic simulation of land use change based on logistic-CA-Markov and WLC-CA-Markov models: a case study in three gorges reservoir area of Chongqing, China.基于 logistic-CA-Markov 和 WLC-CA-Markov 模型的土地利用变化动态模拟:以中国重庆三峡库区为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jul;26(20):20669-20688. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05127-9. Epub 2019 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Study on the spatial and temporal evolution of ecosystem service value based on land use change in Xi'an City.基于西安市土地利用变化的生态系统服务价值时空演变研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):66. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83257-y.
2
Quantifying the spatial differentiation mechanism of land use degree.量化土地利用程度的空间分异机制。
Heliyon. 2022 Nov 8;8(11):e11389. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11389. eCollection 2022 Nov.