• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增益和损失对注意捕获和脱离的贡献:来自缺口范式的证据。

Contributions of gains and losses to attentional capture and disengagement: evidence from the gap paradigm.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, No. 1 Daxue Road, Changqing District, Jinan, 250358, People's Republic of China.

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2021 Nov;239(11):3381-3395. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06210-9. Epub 2021 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-021-06210-9
PMID:34495366
Abstract

It is known that movements of visual attention are influenced by features in a scene, such as colors, that are associated with value or with loss. The present study examined the detailed nature of these attentional effects by employing the gap paradigm-a technique that has been used to separately reveal changes in attentional capture and shifting, and changes in attentional disengagement. In four experiments, participants either looked toward or away from stimuli with colors that had been associated either with gains or with losses. We found that participants were faster to look to colors associated with gains and slower to look away from them, revealing effects of gains on both attentional capture and attentional disengagement. On the other hand, participants were both slower to look to features associated with loss, and faster to look away from such features. The pattern of results suggested, however, that the latter finding was not due to more rapid disengagement from loss-associated colors, but instead to more rapid shifting of attention away from such colors. Taken together, the results reveal a complex pattern of effects of gains and losses on the disengagement, capture, and shifting of visual attention, revealing a remarkable flexibility of the attention system.

摘要

众所周知,视觉注意力的运动受到与价值或损失相关的场景特征的影响,例如颜色。本研究通过使用间隙范式(一种已被用于分别揭示注意力捕获和转移变化以及注意力脱离变化的技术)来检查这些注意力效应的详细性质。在四项实验中,参与者要么看向与收益相关的颜色刺激,要么看向与损失相关的颜色刺激。我们发现,参与者看向与收益相关的颜色更快,而从这些颜色移开的速度较慢,这表明收益对注意力捕获和注意力脱离都有影响。另一方面,参与者既更慢地看向与损失相关的特征,也更快地从这些特征上移开视线。然而,结果模式表明,后一种发现不是由于从与损失相关的颜色更快地脱离,而是由于更迅速地将注意力从这些颜色上转移开。总之,这些结果揭示了收益和损失对视觉注意力脱离、捕获和转移的复杂影响模式,展现了注意力系统的显著灵活性。

相似文献

1
Contributions of gains and losses to attentional capture and disengagement: evidence from the gap paradigm.增益和损失对注意捕获和脱离的贡献:来自缺口范式的证据。
Exp Brain Res. 2021 Nov;239(11):3381-3395. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06210-9. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
2
Rewarding outcomes enhance attentional capture and delay attentional disengagement.奖励结果增强了注意力捕获,并延迟了注意力解除。
PeerJ. 2023 Aug 18;11:e15868. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15868. eCollection 2023.
3
Attentional disengagement effect based on relevant features.基于相关特征的注意脱离效应。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 9;13:960183. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.960183. eCollection 2022.
4
The asymmetrical influence of increasing time-on-task on attentional disengagement.任务持续时间增加对注意力脱离的不对称影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Nov;92:107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.026. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
5
Direct evidence for the optimal tuning of attention.直接证据表明注意力的最佳调节。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Jul;46(7):716-728. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000744. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
6
Can't Look Away: An Eye-Tracking Based Attentional Disengagement Training for Depression.无法移开视线:一种基于眼动追踪的抑郁症注意力脱离训练
Cognit Ther Res. 2016;40(5):672-686. doi: 10.1007/s10608-016-9766-0. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
7
Components of reward-driven attentional capture.奖励驱动的注意捕获的组成部分。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Feb;78(2):403-14. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-1038-7.
8
The disengagement of visual attention in the gap paradigm across adolescence.青少年期在间隙范式中视觉注意力的脱离。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Dec;235(12):3585-3592. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5085-2. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
9
Slower attentional disengagement but faster perceptual processing near the hand.手部附近注意力脱离较慢,但知觉加工较快。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Mar;174:40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
10
Prioritized attentional processing: Acute stress, memory and stimulus emotionality facilitate attentional disengagement.优先注意加工:急性应激、记忆和刺激情绪促进注意力的脱离。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Feb 17;138:107334. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107334. Epub 2020 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
From learned value to sustained bias: how reward conditioning changes attentional priority.从习得的价值到持续的偏差:奖励条件作用如何改变注意力优先级。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Apr 3;18:1354142. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1354142. eCollection 2024.
2
Rewarding outcomes enhance attentional capture and delay attentional disengagement.奖励结果增强了注意力捕获,并延迟了注意力解除。
PeerJ. 2023 Aug 18;11:e15868. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15868. eCollection 2023.
3
Primary rewards and aversive outcomes have comparable effects on attentional bias.

本文引用的文献

1
Reward-driven distraction: A meta-analysis.奖赏驱动的分心:一项荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2020 Oct;146(10):872-899. doi: 10.1037/bul0000296. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
2
Value-based attention capture: Differential effects of loss and gain contingencies.基于价值的注意力捕获:损失和收益关联的差异效应。
J Vis. 2020 May 11;20(5):4. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.5.4.
3
Delayed disengagement of attention from distractors signalling reward.对发出奖励信号的干扰物的注意力延迟脱离。
正性奖赏和负性结果对注意偏向具有同等影响。
Behav Neurosci. 2023 Apr;137(2):89-94. doi: 10.1037/bne0000543. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
4
Evaluative distractors modulate attentional disengagement: People would rather stay longer on rewards.评价性干扰因素会调节注意力的脱离:人们更愿意在奖励上停留更长时间。
J Vis. 2022 Jul 11;22(8):12. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.8.12.
Cognition. 2020 Feb;195:104125. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104125. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
4
Approach and avoidance movements modulate value-driven attentional capture.趋近和回避运动调节价值驱动的注意力捕获。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Jan;46(1):105-123. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000706. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
5
Winners and losers: Reward and punishment produce biases in temporal selection.赢家与输家:奖励与惩罚在时间选择上产生偏差。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 May;45(5):822-833. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000612. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
6
Motion onset really does capture attention.运动起始确实能吸引注意力。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Oct;80(7):1775-1784. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1548-1.
7
Miss it and miss out: Counterproductive nonspatial attentional capture by task-irrelevant, value-related stimuli.错过它就会错失良机:与任务无关但与价值相关的刺激对非空间注意力的反生产性捕获。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Aug;79(6):1628-1642. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1346-1.
8
On the value-dependence of value-driven attentional capture.关于价值驱动的注意捕获的价值依赖性。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 May;79(4):1001-1011. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1289-6.
9
People look at the object they fear: oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal threat.人们会看向他们所恐惧的物体:对发出威胁信号的刺激产生动眼捕捉。
Cogn Emot. 2017 Dec;31(8):1707-1714. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1248905. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
10
Anxiety and attention to threat: Cognitive mechanisms and treatment with attention bias modification.焦虑与对威胁的关注:认知机制及注意偏向矫正治疗
Behav Res Ther. 2016 Dec;87:76-108. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 7.