School of Pharmacy, Sol Price School of Public Policy, The Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, MA, USA.
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Apr;23(3):433-451. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01367-0. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
The generalized risk-adjusted cost-effectiveness (GRACE) model generalizes conventional cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) by introducing diminishing returns to Health-Related Quality of Life (QoL). This changes CEA practice in three ways: (1) Willingness to pay (WTP) increases exponentially with untreated illness severity or pre-existing permanent disability, and WTP ends up lower for mild diseases but higher for severe diseases compared with conventional CEA; (2) Average treatment effectiveness should be adjusted for uncertainty in outcomes; and (3) The marginal rate of substitution between life expectancy and QoL varies with health state. Implementing GRACE requires new parameters describing risk preferences over QoL, the marginal rate of substitution between life expectancy (LE) and QoL, and the variance and skewness of treatment outcomes distributions. In this paper, we provide: (1) a generalized WTP threshold incorporating the possibility of permanent disability; (2) a simpler method to estimate the tradeoff rate between QoL and LE, eliminating the need to carry out treatment-by-treatment estimates; (3) a more-general method to adjust WTP for illness severity that permits non-constant relative risk-aversion in QoL; (4) a new approach to estimating risk-preferences over QoL, leveraging established empirical methods from "happiness" economics; and (5) a step-by-step guide for practitioners wishing to implement multi-period GRACE analyses.
广义风险调整成本效益(GRACE)模型通过引入健康相关生活质量(QoL)的收益递减来推广传统的成本效益分析(CEA)。这在以下三个方面改变了 CEA 实践:(1)未治疗疾病严重程度或预先存在的永久性残疾的意愿支付(WTP)呈指数增长,与传统 CEA 相比,轻度疾病的 WTP 较低,但严重疾病的 WTP 较高;(2)应根据结果的不确定性调整平均治疗效果;(3)预期寿命和 QoL 之间的边际替代率随健康状况而变化。实施 GRACE 需要新的参数来描述对 QoL 的风险偏好、预期寿命(LE)和 QoL 之间的边际替代率,以及治疗结果分布的方差和偏度。在本文中,我们提供了:(1)包含永久性残疾可能性的广义 WTP 阈值;(2)一种更简单的方法来估计 QoL 和 LE 之间的权衡率,消除了逐个治疗进行估计的需要;(3)一种更通用的方法来调整 WTP 以适应疾病严重程度,允许 QoL 中的非恒定相对风险厌恶;(4)一种新的方法来估计 QoL 的风险偏好,利用“幸福”经济学中已建立的实证方法;(5)希望实施多期 GRACE 分析的从业者的分步指南。