Suppr超能文献

西班牙注册护士和护生对压疮分期及皮肤损伤照片的分类:一项观察性比较研究。

Classification of Pressure Injury Stages and Skin Damage Photographs by RNs and Nursing Students in Spain: An Observational Comparison Study.

作者信息

Rodriguez-Calero Miguel Angel, Fullana-Matas Antonia, Miró-Bonet Rosa

机构信息

Miguel Angel Rodriguez-Calero, MSc, RN, Health System of the Balearic Islands, Palma, Spain; Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of the Balearic Islands, Palma, Spain; and CurES Research Group, Balearic Islands Healthcare Research Institute (IdISIBa), Palma, Spain.

Antonia Fullana-Matas, RN, Fundación Hospital Manacor, Mallorca, Spain.

出版信息

J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2021;48(5):403-409. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000803.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and classify pressure injuries (PIs) and other skin lesions according to the judgment of hospital-based RNs and nursing students who recently trained in wound care using photographs and comparing findings to those of wound care experts.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional observational survey.

SUBJECT AND SETTING

RNs working at Manacor Hospital, Mallorca, Spain, and third-year nursing students from the University of the Balearic Islands. Data were collected in June 2017.

METHODS

The survey instrument was accompanied by a set of 24 photographs in 7 categories of skin lesions, such as PIs or moisture-associated skin damage, which the respondents were asked to classify. Descriptive analysis of the classifications was carried out, and levels of agreement using the chi-square test were compared with evaluations/classifications of a panel of experts.

RESULTS

In total, 314 surveys (199 RNs and 115 students) were included in the analyses. Findings showed a wide variability among participants with levels of agreement, with expert opinion ranging from 91.4% to 15.61%. The levels of agreement were substantially lower for unstageable PIs (47.92%), those caused by moisture (53.50%), and mixed etiology (38.37%) than for stages 1-4 PIs. Of note, 62.12% of RNs had not received PI training or continuing education during the previous 2 years. This lack of education was statistically significantly associated with the accuracy of the classification made by the RNs for some of the photographs evaluated such as moisture-associated skin damage.

CONCLUSIONS

We found discrepancies in the classification of PIs and other wounds/lesions among experts, RNs, and students. The regular provision of up-to-date information in training and continuing education programs is imperative to maintain nurses' abilities to identify and classify PIs and other skin-related damage.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在根据在伤口护理方面接受过近期培训的医院注册护士(RN)和护理专业学生通过照片做出的判断,对压力性损伤(PI)和其他皮肤损伤进行评估和分类,并将结果与伤口护理专家的评估结果进行比较。

设计

横断面观察性调查。

研究对象与背景

西班牙马略卡岛马纳科尔医院的注册护士以及来自巴利阿里群岛大学的三年级护理专业学生。数据于2017年6月收集。

方法

调查问卷配有一组24张照片,涵盖7类皮肤损伤,如压力性损伤或与潮湿相关的皮肤损伤,要求受访者对其进行分类。对分类结果进行描述性分析,并使用卡方检验将一致性水平与专家小组的评估/分类结果进行比较。

结果

分析共纳入314份调查问卷(199名注册护士和115名学生)。结果显示,参与者之间的一致性水平差异很大,专家意见的一致性范围从91.4%到15.61%。不可分期的压力性损伤(47.92%)、由潮湿引起的损伤(53.50%)以及混合病因的损伤(38.37%)的一致性水平明显低于1 - 4期压力性损伤。值得注意的是,62.12%的注册护士在过去两年内未接受过压力性损伤培训或继续教育。这种教育缺失在统计学上与注册护士对某些评估照片(如与潮湿相关的皮肤损伤)的分类准确性显著相关。

结论

我们发现专家、注册护士和学生在压力性损伤及其他伤口/损伤的分类上存在差异。在培训和继续教育项目中定期提供最新信息对于维持护士识别和分类压力性损伤及其他皮肤相关损伤的能力至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验