Sundaresan P R, Wardell W M, Weintraub M, Lasagna L
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1979 Apr;25(4):391-8. doi: 10.1002/cpt1979254391.
To test for sustained hypnotic efficacy, triazolam (0.6 mg) or flurazepam (30 mg) was given to chronic insomniac patients for 7 consecutive nights in parallel, double-blind design. Triazolam at this dose was an effective hypnotic by all usual subjective measures and did not produce appreciable hangover. Flurazepam performed similarly. For either drug, comparison of the mean scores for the first 2 nights with that for the last 2 nights for any of the parameters did not reveal any significant difference. Thus, both triazolam and flurazepam showed sustained efficacy for 1 week at these doses. Some interesting theoretical and practical questions about the measurement of sustained efficacy of hypnotics in situations of repetitive dosing were addressed by the study. While a placebo control is desirable, the results obtained may be uninterpretable. An acute-care hospital setting may not be the ideal setting for doing such studies. There were indications from the study that the first-night results in a hypnotic clinical trial may be atypical.
为测试持续催眠效果,在平行双盲设计中,给慢性失眠患者连续7晚服用三唑仑(0.6毫克)或氟西泮(30毫克)。按所有常用主观指标衡量,此剂量的三唑仑是一种有效的催眠药,且不会产生明显宿醉效应。氟西泮表现类似。对于任何一种药物,比较前两晚与最后两晚任何参数的平均得分均未发现显著差异。因此,三唑仑和氟西泮在这些剂量下均显示出持续1周的疗效。该研究提出了一些关于在重复给药情况下测量催眠药持续疗效的有趣理论和实际问题。虽然需要安慰剂对照,但获得的结果可能无法解释。急症医院环境可能不是进行此类研究的理想环境。该研究表明,催眠临床试验中的首夜结果可能不具代表性。