Fabre L F, Gross L, Pasigajen V, Metzler C
J Clin Pharmacol. 1977 Jul;17(7):402-9. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1977.tb04623.x.
In this two-clinic seven-day double-blind study, 0.5 mg triazolam (Halcion) was compared to flurazepam (Dalmane) in the treatment of insomnia. Two clinical investigators completed 118 outpatients, 61 on triazolam and 57 on flurazepam. Five patients, four on triazolam and one on flurazepam, discontinued because of side effects; and three patients, one on triazolam and two on flurazepam, discontinued because of ineffectiveness of the medication. Analysis of pooled data for the 110 evaluable patients showed that 0.5 mg triazolam was significantly better than 30 mg flurazepam on the following parameters: (1) how much the medication helped the patients sleep, (2) onset of sleep, (3) duration of sleep, (4) evaluation of duration of sleep, and (5) feeling of restfulness in the morning. The trend for all other parameters favored triazolam treatment, but the values did not reach statistical significance. Side effects were similar in both groups, with drowsiness being reported most frequently. No change in efficacy indicating tolerance development during the seven days of drug administration was observed in either group.
在这项双中心、为期七天的双盲研究中,对0.5毫克三唑仑(海乐神)和氟西泮(多睡丹)治疗失眠的效果进行了比较。两名临床研究人员共纳入了118名门诊患者,其中61人服用三唑仑,57人服用氟西泮。五名患者因副作用停药,其中四名服用三唑仑,一名服用氟西泮;三名患者因药物无效停药,其中一名服用三唑仑,两名服用氟西泮。对110名可评估患者的汇总数据进行分析后发现,在以下参数方面,0.5毫克三唑仑显著优于30毫克氟西泮:(1)药物对患者睡眠的帮助程度;(2)入睡时间;(3)睡眠时间;(4)对睡眠时间的评估;(5)早晨的轻松感。所有其他参数的趋势都有利于三唑仑治疗,但数值未达到统计学显著性。两组的副作用相似,最常见的是嗜睡。在给药七天期间,两组均未观察到表明产生耐受性的疗效变化。