Suppr超能文献

FractionLab在调强放射治疗患者特异性质量保证中的临床性能:一项回顾性研究。

Clinical performance of FractionLab in patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Oh Se An, Kim Sung Yeop, Park Jaehyeon, Park Jae Won, Yea Ji Woon

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.

Department of Physics, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Korea.

出版信息

J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2022 Apr;39(2):108-115. doi: 10.12701/yujm.2021.01123. Epub 2021 Sep 9.

Abstract

BACKGRUOUND

This study was aimed at comparing and analyzing the results of FractionLab (Varian/Mobius Medical System) with those of portal dosimetry that uses an electronic portal imaging device. Portal dosimetry is extensively used for patient-specific quality assurance (QA) in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

METHODS

The study includes 29 patients who underwent IMRT on a Novalis-Tx linear accelerator (Varian Medical System and BrainLAB) between June 2019 and March 2021. We analyzed the multileaf collimator (MLC) DynaLog files generated after portal dosimetry to evaluate the same condition using FractionLab. The results of the recently launched FractionLab at various gamma indices (0.1%/0.1 mm-1%/1 mm) are analyzed and compared with those of portal dosimetry (3%/3 mm).

RESULTS

The average gamma passing rates of portal dosimetry (3%/3 mm) and FractionLab are 98.1 (95.5%-100%) and 97.5% (92.3%-99.7%) at 0.6%/0.6 mm, respectively. The results of portal dosimetry (3%/3 mm) are statistically comparable with the QA results of FractionLab (0.6%/0.6 mm-0.9%/0.9 mm).

CONCLUSION

This paper presents the clinical performance of FractionLab by the comparison of the QA results of FractionLab using portal dosimetry with various gamma indexes when performing patient-specific QA in IMRT treatment. Further, the appropriate gamma index when performing patient-specific QA with FractionLab is provided.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较和分析FractionLab(瓦里安/莫比乌斯医疗系统)与使用电子射野影像装置的射野剂量测定法的结果。射野剂量测定法广泛用于调强放射治疗(IMRT)中针对患者的质量保证(QA)。

方法

该研究纳入了29例在2019年6月至2021年3月期间在诺瓦利斯-Tx直线加速器(瓦里安医疗系统和BrainLAB)上接受IMRT治疗的患者。我们分析了射野剂量测定后生成的多叶准直器(MLC)动态日志文件,以使用FractionLab评估相同情况。分析了最近推出的FractionLab在各种伽马指数(0.1%/0.1毫米 - 1%/1毫米)下的结果,并与射野剂量测定法(3%/3毫米)的结果进行比较。

结果

在0.6%/0.6毫米时,射野剂量测定法(3%/3毫米)和FractionLab的平均伽马通过率分别为98.1(95.5% - 100%)和97.5%(92.3% - 99.7%)。射野剂量测定法(3%/3毫米)的结果与FractionLab(0.6%/0.6毫米 - 0.9%/0.9毫米)的QA结果在统计学上具有可比性。

结论

本文通过在IMRT治疗中进行针对患者的QA时,比较使用射野剂量测定法的FractionLab在各种伽马指数下的QA结果,展示了FractionLab的临床性能。此外,还提供了使用FractionLab进行针对患者的QA时合适的伽马指数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2683/8913919/6e8982c02ec9/yujm-2021-01123f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical performance of FractionLab in patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a retrospective study.
J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2022 Apr;39(2):108-115. doi: 10.12701/yujm.2021.01123. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
7
Predicting gamma passing rates for portal dosimetry-based IMRT QA using machine learning.
Med Phys. 2019 Oct;46(10):4666-4675. doi: 10.1002/mp.13752. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
9
A novel approach to SBRT patient quality assurance using EPID-based real-time transit dosimetry : A step to QA with in vivo EPID dosimetry.
Strahlenther Onkol. 2020 Feb;196(2):182-192. doi: 10.1007/s00066-019-01549-z. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
10
A Varian DynaLog file-based procedure for patient dose-volume histogram-based IMRT QA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Mar 6;15(2):4665. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4665.

本文引用的文献

2
Recent trends in intensity-modulated radiation therapy use in Korea.
Radiat Oncol J. 2019 Dec;37(4):249-253. doi: 10.3857/roj.2019.00577. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
3
Transit and non-transit 3D EPID dosimetry versus detector arrays for patient specific QA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Jun;20(6):79-90. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12610. Epub 2019 May 13.
4
Evaluation of machine log files/MC-based treatment planning and delivery QA as compared to ArcCHECK QA.
Med Phys. 2018 Jul;45(7):2864-2874. doi: 10.1002/mp.12926. Epub 2018 May 11.
6
Investigation of error detection capabilities of phantom, EPID and MLC log file based IMRT QA methods.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Jul;18(4):172-179. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12114. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
9
Pixel response-based EPID dosimetry for patient specific QA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Jan;18(1):9-17. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12007. Epub 2016 Dec 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验