Sciarra Luigi, Cavarretta Elena, Siciliani Stefania, Sette Antonella, Scarà Antonio, Grieco Domenico, DE Ruvo Ermenegildo, Palamà Zefferino, Nesti Martina, Romano Silvio, Penco Maria, Pelliccia Antonio, Calò Leonardo
Department of Cardiology, Casilino Polyclinic, Rome, Italy.
Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University, Latina, Italy -
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2022 Apr;62(4):554-559. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.21.12831-2. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
Palpitations in athletes are usually benign, but the presence of major cardiac arrhythmias should be ruled out despite the infrequent appraisal of symptoms. External loop recorders (ELR) are promising to identify arrhythmias in these circumstances, but experiences in athletes are lacking. We aimed to investigate the feasibility and diagnostic yield of an ELR in athletes with unexplained palpitations in a cohort study.
One hundred twenty-two consecutive subjects (61 athletes and 61 sedentary controls) with sporadic palpitations and inconclusive diagnosis were enrolled and equipped with an ELR. Findings were categorized as major and minor arrhythmic findings, non-arrhythmic findings or negative monitoring.
Long-term ELR monitoring was feasible in all subjects, with median duration of 12 (11; 15) days. Major arrhythmic events during palpitations were found in 9 (14.8%) athletes: 7 experienced sustained paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, and 2 had non sustained ventricular tachycardia. Minor arrhythmic events (premature supraventricular or ventricular beats) were observed in 13 athletes (21.3%). Non-arrhythmic findings (i.e., sinus rhythm or sinus tachycardia) were recorded in 28 athletes (45.9%), whereas 11 (18%) had negative monitoring. In the sedentary group, arrhythmic events were similar for types and frequency to athletes. The diagnostic yield of loop monitoring was 82.8% in the overall population and 82.0% in the athlete's group.
In the management of an athlete symptomatic with unexplained palpitations after 24-hour ECG monitoring and stress test, ELR is an efficient tool to identify major arrhythmic events, which can be present in up to 10% of symptomatic athletes during practice and competition.
运动员心悸通常为良性,但即便症状评估不常见,仍应排除重大心律失常的存在。外置式循环记录仪(ELR)有望在这些情况下识别心律失常,但运动员方面的经验尚缺。我们旨在通过一项队列研究调查ELR在不明原因心悸的运动员中的可行性及诊断率。
连续纳入122名有偶发性心悸且诊断不明确的受试者(61名运动员和61名久坐对照者),并为其配备ELR。结果分为重大和轻微心律失常结果、非心律失常结果或监测阴性。
所有受试者均可行长期ELR监测,中位时长为12(11;15)天。9名(14.8%)运动员在心悸期间出现重大心律失常事件:7例经历持续性阵发性室上性心动过速,2例出现非持续性室性心动过速。13名运动员(21.3%)观察到轻微心律失常事件(房性或室性早搏)。28名运动员(45.9%)记录到非心律失常结果(即窦性心律或窦性心动过速),而11名(18%)监测结果为阴性。在久坐组中,心律失常事件的类型和频率与运动员相似。循环监测的总体诊断率在总人群中为82.8%,在运动员组中为82.0%。
在对经24小时心电图监测和压力测试后仍有不明原因心悸症状的运动员进行管理时,ELR是识别重大心律失常事件的有效工具,在练习和比赛期间,高达10%的有症状运动员可能出现此类事件。