• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中延迟支架置入:探讨在血栓负荷较重情况下的益处及合适的间隔时间。

Stenting deferral in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: exploring benefits and suitable interval in heavy thrombus burden.

作者信息

Magdy Ahmed M, Demitry Salwa R, Hasan-Ali Hosam, Zaky Mohamed, Abd El-Hady Mohamed, Abdel Ghany Mohamed

机构信息

Cardiovascular Medicine, National Heart Institute, Cairo, Egypt.

Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Asyut, Egypt.

出版信息

Egypt Heart J. 2021 Sep 9;73(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s43044-021-00203-3.

DOI:10.1186/s43044-021-00203-3
PMID:34499263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8429529/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Deferred stenting, despite being successful in early studies, showed no benefit in recent trials. However, these trials were testing routine deferral; not in patients with heavy thrombus burden.

RESULTS

This is a prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial that included 150 patients who presented with STEMI, patients were allocated into three equal groups after the coronary angiography ± primary intervention and before stenting of the culprit lesion; group (A) included 50 patients with early deferral of stenting, group (B) included 50 patients with late deferral and group (C) included 50 patients with immediate stenting. No-reflow was significantly higher in group C, while Final TIMI flow grade 3 and MBG grade 3 were significantly higher in group A and B than group C; p = 0.019 and < 0.001 respectively, with no significant difference between groups A and B, only the thrombus resolution in group B was significantly higher than group A; p < 0.001. Finally, 6-months, over-all MACE was significantly higher in group C (34.7% vs. 14.6% and 16.3%, p = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Stent deferral was proved to be better than immediate stenting after recanalization of IRA, in achieving TIMI III flow, reducing risk of 6 months MACE, and restoration of myocardial function in a subset of STEMI patients presenting with large thrombus burden. While, no significant difference was found between both deferral times in final TIMI flow, or clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景

延迟支架置入术尽管在早期研究中取得了成功,但在近期试验中未显示出益处。然而,这些试验测试的是常规延迟;而非针对血栓负荷重的患者。

结果

这是一项前瞻性随机临床试验,纳入了150例ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者,在冠状动脉造影±初次干预后且在罪犯病变置入支架前,将患者分为三组,每组50例;A组包括50例早期延迟支架置入患者,B组包括50例晚期延迟患者,C组包括50例即刻支架置入患者。C组无复流发生率显著更高,而A组和B组的最终心肌梗死溶栓试验(TIMI)血流3级和心肌梗死溶栓试验心肌灌注分级(MBG)3级显著高于C组;p分别为0.019和<0.001,A组和B组之间无显著差异,仅B组的血栓溶解率显著高于A组;p<0.001。最后,C组6个月时总体主要不良心血管事件(MACE)显著更高(34.7% 对14.6%和16.3%,p = 0.029)。

结论

对于IRA再通后血栓负荷大的部分STEMI患者,支架延迟置入在实现TIMI Ⅲ级血流、降低6个月MACE风险及恢复心肌功能方面被证明优于即刻支架置入。而在最终TIMI血流或临床结局方面,两种延迟时间之间未发现显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5fa/8429529/c5096bd55883/43044_2021_203_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5fa/8429529/c5096bd55883/43044_2021_203_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5fa/8429529/c5096bd55883/43044_2021_203_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Stenting deferral in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: exploring benefits and suitable interval in heavy thrombus burden.在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中延迟支架置入:探讨在血栓负荷较重情况下的益处及合适的间隔时间。
Egypt Heart J. 2021 Sep 9;73(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s43044-021-00203-3.
2
[Deferred versus immediate stenting in patients with ST - segment elevation myocardial infarction and residual large thrombus burden reclassified in the culprit lesion].ST段抬高型心肌梗死且罪犯病变中残留大量血栓负荷患者的延迟支架置入与即刻支架置入对比研究(重新分类)
Arch Cardiol Mex. 2018 Dec;88(5):432-440. doi: 10.1016/j.acmx.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
3
Effect of optimized thrombus aspiration on myocardial perfusion and prognosis in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.优化血栓抽吸对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者心肌灌注及预后的影响
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Oct 4;10:1249924. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1249924. eCollection 2023.
4
A randomized trial of deferred stenting versus immediate stenting to prevent no- or slow-reflow in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (DEFER-STEMI).一项关于延迟支架置入术与即刻支架置入术预防急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死无复流或慢血流的随机试验(DEFER-STEMI)
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 May 27;63(20):2088-2098. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.530. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
5
Delayed versus immediate stenting for the treatment of ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction with a high thrombus burden.延迟支架置入与即刻支架置入治疗高血栓负荷ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死的对比研究
Coron Artery Dis. 2012 Nov;23(7):497-506. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e328358a5ad.
6
Deferred Stenting for Heavy Thrombus Burden During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation MI.ST段抬高型心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间对重度血栓负荷进行延迟支架置入术。
Eur Cardiol. 2021 Mar 30;16:e08. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2020.31. eCollection 2021 Feb.
7
Role of deferred stenting in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.延迟支架置入术在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Interv Cardiol. 2017 Jun;30(3):264-273. doi: 10.1111/joic.12380. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
8
Deferred vs Immediate Stenting in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Collaborative Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时延迟与即刻支架置入的比较:基于心脏磁共振成像数据的随机试验协同荟萃分析。
Can J Cardiol. 2018 Dec;34(12):1573-1580. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.07.480. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
9
Non-stenting strategy is not inferior to stent implantation in patients with acute ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction and high thrombus burden and intermediate stenotic culprit lesion.对于急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死且血栓负荷高和中等狭窄罪犯病变的患者,非支架置入策略并不逊于支架植入。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Oct;10(10):10849-10860. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-2612.
10
The outcomes in STEMI patients with high thrombus burden treated by deferred versus immediate stent implantation in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective cohort study.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者血栓负荷高时,在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中延迟与即刻支架植入的疗效比较:一项前瞻性队列研究
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Apr;9(7):573. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-1130.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification and Management Strategies for Intracoronary High Thrombus Burden in Patients With STEMI: A Practical Experience and Literature Review.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者冠状动脉内高血栓负荷的识别与管理策略:实践经验与文献综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jul 30;26(7):37466. doi: 10.31083/RCM37466. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Deferred Versus Immediate Stenting in Late-Presenting ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) Patients With a High Thrombus Burden: A Retrospective Analysis.高血栓负荷的晚期就诊ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者延迟支架置入与即刻支架置入的回顾性分析
Cureus. 2025 Jun 18;17(6):e86317. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86317. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Pathophysiology and diagnosis of coronary microvascular dysfunction in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死中冠状动脉微血管功能障碍的病理生理学和诊断。
Cardiovasc Res. 2020 Mar 1;116(4):787-805. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvz301.
2
Correlates of the "No-Reflow" or "Slow-Flow" Phenomenon in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中“无复流”或“慢血流”现象的相关因素
J Tehran Heart Cent. 2018 Jul;13(3):108-114.
3
Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018).心肌梗死的第四次全球定义(2018年)。
Outcomes of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by a prolonged "Deferred" percutaneous coronary intervention strategy.
采用延长的“延迟”经皮冠状动脉介入治疗策略治疗的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的预后
World J Cardiol. 2025 Feb 26;17(2):99074. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i2.99074.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Deferred Stenting in Geriatric Patients with STEMI and High Thrombus Burden.延迟支架置入术在老年ST段抬高型心肌梗死伴高血栓负荷患者中的疗效和安全性
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 5;25(3):88. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2503088. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 14;40(3):237-269. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy462.
4
2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394.
5
2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.
6
INNOVATION Study (Impact of Immediate Stent Implantation Versus Deferred Stent Implantation on Infarct Size and Microvascular Perfusion in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction).创新研究(ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者即刻支架植入与延迟支架植入对梗死面积和微血管灌注的影响)
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Dec;9(12). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004101.
7
Deferred versus conventional stent implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (DANAMI 3-DEFER): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者延迟与常规支架植入的比较(DANAMI 3-DEFER):一项开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2016 May 28;387(10034):2199-206. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30072-1. Epub 2016 Apr 3.
8
Comparison of Immediate With Delayed Stenting Using the Minimalist Immediate Mechanical Intervention Approach in Acute ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The MIMI Study.急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死中采用 Minimalist 即刻机械干预方法行即刻与延迟支架置入的对比:MIMI 研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar;9(3):e003388. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003388.
9
No-Reflow Phoenomenon by Intracoronary Thrombus in Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死中冠状动脉内血栓导致的无复流现象
Chonnam Med J. 2016 Jan;52(1):38-44. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2016.52.1.38. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
10
Delayed Stenting for ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction in Daily Practice: A Single-Centre Experience.在日常实践中对 ST 段抬高型急性心肌梗死进行延迟支架置入术:单中心经验。
Can J Cardiol. 2016 Aug;32(8):988-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.015. Epub 2015 Sep 26.