Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Diretoria de Ensino e Pesquisa, Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus, Brazil.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Sep 9;15(9):e0009758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009758. eCollection 2021 Sep.
In the Brazilian Amazon, long distances, low healthcare coverage, common use of ineffective or deleterious self-care practices, and resistance to seeking medical assistance have an impact on access to antivenom treatment. This study aimed to estimate snakebite underreporting, and analyze barriers that prevent victims from obtaining healthcare in communities located in 15 municipalities on the banks of the Solimões, Juruá and Purus Rivers, in the remote Western Brazilian Amazon. Information on the participants' demographics, previous snakebites, access to healthcare, time taken to reach medical assistance, use of self-care practices, and the reason for not accessing healthcare were collected through semi-structured interviews. In the case of deaths, information was collected by interviewing parents, relatives or acquaintances. A total of 172 participants who reported having suffered snakebites during their lifetime were interviewed. A total of 73 different treatment procedures was reported by 65.1% of the participants. Participants living in different river basins share few self-care procedures that use traditional medicine, and 91 (52.9%) participants reported that they had access to healthcare. Living in communities along the Juruá River [OR = 12.6 (95% CI = 3.2-49.7; p<0.001)] and the use of traditional medicine [OR = 11.6 (95% CI = 3.4-39.8; p<0.001)] were variables that were independently associated to the lack of access to healthcare. The main reasons for not accessing healthcare were the pprioritization of traditional treatments (70.4%), and the failure to recognize the situation as being potentially severe (50.6%). Four deaths from complications arising from the snakebite were reported, and three of these were from communities on the banks of the Juruá River. Only one of these received medical assistance. We found an unexpectedly high underreporting of snakebite cases and associated deaths. Snakebite victims utilized three main different healing systems: 1) self-care using miscellaneous techniques; 2) official medical healthcare generally combined with traditional practices; and 3) self-care using traditional practices combined with Western medicines. To mitigate snakebite burden in the Brazilian Amazon, an innovative intervention that would optimize timely delivery of care, including antivenom distribution among existing community healthcare centers, is needed.
在巴西亚马逊地区,由于路途遥远、医疗保健覆盖率低、人们普遍采用无效或有害的自我护理方法以及对寻求医疗援助的抵触,这些因素都对获得抗蛇毒血清治疗产生了影响。本研究旨在估计该地区蛇咬伤漏报情况,并分析阻碍受害者在位于索利蒙伊斯河、茹鲁阿河和普鲁斯河沿岸的 15 个市镇的社区获得医疗保健的因素。通过半结构化访谈收集参与者的人口统计学、以前的蛇咬伤、获得医疗保健的途径、到达医疗援助的时间、自我护理方法的使用情况以及未获得医疗保健的原因等信息。在死亡的情况下,通过采访父母、亲属或熟人收集信息。共采访了 172 名报告在其一生中曾遭受过蛇咬伤的参与者。65.1%的参与者报告了总共 73 种不同的治疗方法。生活在不同流域的参与者很少使用传统医学的自我护理方法,有 91 名(52.9%)参与者表示他们可以获得医疗保健。生活在茹鲁阿河流域的社区[比值比(OR)=12.6(95%置信区间(CI)=3.2-49.7;p<0.001)]和使用传统医学[OR=11.6(95%CI=3.4-39.8;p<0.001)]是与无法获得医疗保健独立相关的两个变量。不寻求医疗保健的主要原因是优先考虑传统治疗(70.4%),以及未能认识到情况可能很严重(50.6%)。报告了四起由蛇咬伤引起的并发症死亡病例,其中三例发生在茹鲁阿河流域的社区。只有一名接受了医疗救助。我们发现蛇咬伤病例和相关死亡病例的漏报率出乎意料地高。蛇咬伤受害者使用了三种主要的不同治疗系统:1)使用各种技术的自我护理;2)官方医疗保健通常结合传统实践;3)使用传统实践结合西药的自我护理。为了减轻巴西亚马逊地区的蛇咬伤负担,需要采取一种创新干预措施,即在现有的社区医疗保健中心分配抗蛇毒血清,以优化及时提供护理。