Buck R L, Escamilla J, Sangalang R P, Cabanban A B, Santiago L T, Ranoa C P, Cross J H
US Naval Medical Research Unit No. 2, APO San Francisco, California 96528.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1987;81(5):871-3. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(87)90056-3.
101 patients with a clinical suspicion of typhoid or paratyphoid (enteric) fever admitted to San Lazaro Hospital, Manila, Philippines, were studied by bacteriological culture of blood, rectal swab, urine and duodenal string capsule; 35 also had bacteriological culture of bone marrow aspirate. 44 of the patients were culture-confirmed as having enteric fever; the remainder were classified as non-enteric fever cases. Analysis of the pretreatment Widal agglutination titres of all patients revealed that using as a diagnostic criterion an antibody titre of greater than or equal to 1:80 to the O antigen of Salmonella typhi yielded a test specificity of 100%, although the corresponding sensitivity was only 64%. The sensitivity of the test could be increased to 80% by using different cut-off values for titres to flagellar antigens, but this concomitantly decreased the test specificity from 100 to 82%. The data indicate that a single pretreatment Widal test in suspected enteric fever cases is of definite diagnostic value, but that the results must be interpreted with caution and foreknowledge of the test's shortcomings and limitations.
对菲律宾马尼拉圣拉萨罗医院收治的101例临床疑似伤寒或副伤寒(肠热症)患者进行了研究,通过对血液、直肠拭子、尿液和十二指肠线囊进行细菌培养;35例患者还进行了骨髓穿刺细菌培养。44例患者经培养确诊为肠热症;其余患者被归类为非肠热症病例。对所有患者治疗前的肥达凝集试验效价分析表明,以伤寒沙门菌O抗原抗体效价大于或等于1:80作为诊断标准,试验特异性为100%,尽管相应的敏感性仅为64%。通过对鞭毛抗原效价使用不同的临界值,试验敏感性可提高到80%,但这同时使试验特异性从100%降至82%。数据表明,在疑似肠热症病例中单次治疗前肥达试验具有一定的诊断价值,但结果必须谨慎解释,并预先了解该试验的缺点和局限性。