Suppr超能文献

维达试验在土耳其伤寒热诊断中的应用

Widal test in diagnosis of typhoid fever in Turkey.

作者信息

Willke Ayse, Ergonul Onder, Bayar Banu

机构信息

Kocaeli Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Klinik Bakteriyoloji ve Infeksiyon Hastaliklari AD, Izmit, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002 Jul;9(4):938-41. doi: 10.1128/cdli.9.4.938-941.2002.

Abstract

We studied the value of the Widal tube agglutination test for the diagnosis of typhoid fever. The subjects were all adults >18 years of age and were divided into four groups: (i) 317 healthy blood donor controls, (ii) 31 bacteriologically confirmed patients with Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi, (iii) 21 patients with a clinical diagnosis of typhoid fever, and (iv) 41 febrile nontyphoid patients. Blood donor controls were screened with a slide agglutination test for the Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi O and H antigens, and positives were then tested with the Widal test. Acute- and convalescent-phase sera from patients in groups 2, 3, and 4 were obtained 7 to 10 days apart and tested by the Widal test. Using a cutoff of >or = 1/200 for the O antigen test performed on acute-phase serum gave a sensitivity of 52% and a specificity of 88% with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 76% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 71%. This increased to 90% sensitivity and specificity with a PPV of 88% and an NPV of 93% when the convalescent-phase serum was tested. We concluded that O and H agglutinin titers of > or = 1/200 are of diagnostic significance. The Widal test is easy, inexpensive, and relatively noninvasive. It can be of diagnostic value when blood cultures are not available or practical. The results must be interpreted cautiously because of the low sensitivity of the test. The Widal test done on convalescent-phase serum gave more-reliable results with higher specificity and sensitivity.

摘要

我们研究了肥达氏试管凝集试验对伤寒热诊断的价值。研究对象均为18岁以上的成年人,分为四组:(i)317名健康献血者对照;(ii)31名经细菌学确诊的伤寒沙门氏菌血清型伤寒患者;(iii)21名临床诊断为伤寒热的患者;(iv)41名发热的非伤寒患者。对献血者对照进行伤寒沙门氏菌血清型伤寒O和H抗原的玻片凝集试验筛查,阳性者再进行肥达氏试验。对第2、3和4组患者分别在7至10天的间隔时间采集急性期和恢复期血清,并进行肥达氏试验。以急性期血清O抗原试验≥1/200为临界值,敏感性为52%,特异性为88%,阳性预测值(PPV)为76%,阴性预测值(NPV)为71%。检测恢复期血清时,敏感性和特异性提高到90%,PPV为88%,NPV为93%。我们得出结论,O和H凝集素效价≥1/200具有诊断意义。肥达氏试验简便、廉价且相对无创。在无法进行血培养或血培养不可行时,它可能具有诊断价值。由于该试验敏感性较低,结果必须谨慎解读。对恢复期血清进行肥达氏试验可得出更可靠的结果,特异性和敏感性更高。

相似文献

1
Widal test in diagnosis of typhoid fever in Turkey.维达试验在土耳其伤寒热诊断中的应用
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002 Jul;9(4):938-41. doi: 10.1128/cdli.9.4.938-941.2002.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验