Straube Andreas, Eren Ozan
Department of Neurology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Department of Neurology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Auton Neurosci. 2021 Dec;236:102875. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2021.102875. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
First clinical observations of the therapeutic effect of vagus nerve stimulation were of patients who were treated for refractory epilepsy with a fully implanted vagus nerve stimulator, who also reported an improvement of their migraine and cluster headache. With the development of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation, first clinical studies concerning a possible therapeutic effect in migraine and cluster headache were performed. In a controlled study, transcutaneous cervical vagus nerve stimulation (tcVNS) showed a significant but limited effect in acute treatment of a migraine attack. There was no significant prophylactic effect in episodic migraine. Concerning cluster headache, there was a clear beneficial effect in the prophylaxis of chronic cluster headache and in the attack treatment in episodic cluster headache. There are fewer studies in the literature on the effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), with a partial overlap with studies on electrical ear acupuncture. In a small controlled clinical trial, there was a significant effect of taVNS in the prevention of chronic migraine. In less defined clinical studies, there were some positive signs that the method may be beneficial in chronic back pain and in unspecific gastro-intestinal pain in adolescents. Based on the available evidence, it is probable that vagus nerve stimulation can have a clinically meaningful influence on pain syndromes, but there are still several questions (e.g. frequency of the stimulation; duration of the stimulation; differential effects of auricular vagus stimulation and cervical vagus stimulation) to answer before vagus stimulation can be used widely in the clinic.
迷走神经刺激治疗效果的首次临床观察是针对那些使用完全植入式迷走神经刺激器治疗难治性癫痫的患者,这些患者还报告偏头痛和丛集性头痛有所改善。随着非侵入性迷走神经刺激技术的发展,开展了关于其在偏头痛和丛集性头痛中可能的治疗效果的首批临床研究。在一项对照研究中,经皮颈迷走神经刺激(tcVNS)在偏头痛发作的急性治疗中显示出显著但有限的效果。在发作性偏头痛中没有显著的预防作用。关于丛集性头痛,在慢性丛集性头痛的预防和发作性丛集性头痛的发作治疗中存在明显的有益效果。关于经皮耳迷走神经刺激(taVNS)效果的文献研究较少,与电耳针研究部分重叠。在一项小型对照临床试验中,taVNS在预防慢性偏头痛方面有显著效果。在定义不太明确的临床研究中,有一些积极迹象表明该方法可能对青少年慢性背痛和非特异性胃肠道疼痛有益。基于现有证据,迷走神经刺激很可能对疼痛综合征产生具有临床意义的影响,但在迷走神经刺激能够在临床上广泛应用之前,仍有几个问题(例如刺激频率;刺激持续时间;耳迷走神经刺激和颈迷走神经刺激的差异效应)需要解答。