Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Audiology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2022;84(3):211-218. doi: 10.1159/000517562. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
There are particular challenges in the implantation of malformed cochleae, such as in cases of facial nerve anomalies, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks, erroneous electrode insertion, or facial stimulation, and the outcomes may differ depending on the severity of the malformation. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of inner ear malformations (IEMs) on surgical complications and outcomes of cochlear implantation.
In order to assess the impact of IEMs on cochlear implant (CI) outcomes, 2 groups of patients with similar epidemiological parameters were selected from among 863 patients. Both the study group (patients with an IEM) and control group (patients with a normal inner ear) included 25 patients who received a CI and completed at least 1 year of follow-up. Auditory performance, receptive and expressive language skills, and production and use of speech were evaluated preoperatively and at least 1 year after implantation. Types of surgical complications and rates of revision surgeries were determined in each group.
In the study group, the most common malformation was an isolated enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) (44.8%). Overall, the patients with IEMs showed significant improvement in auditory-verbal skills. In general, the patients who had normal cochleae scored significantly better compared to patients with IEMs (p < 0.05). The complication rate was significantly lower in the control group compared to the study group (p = 0.001), but the rate of revision surgeries did not differ significantly (p = 0.637).
It is possible to improve communication skills with CIs in patients with IEMs despite the variations in postoperative performances. Patients with EVA, incomplete partition type 2, and cochlear hypoplasia type 2 were the best performers in terms of auditory-verbal skills. Patients with IEMs scored poorly compared to patients with normal cochleae. CSF leak (gusher or oozing) was the most common complication during surgery, which is highly likely in cases of incomplete partition type 3.
在畸形耳蜗植入中存在一些特殊的挑战,例如面神经异常、脑脊液(CSF)漏、电极插入错误或面神经刺激等情况,并且结果可能因畸形的严重程度而有所不同。本研究旨在评估内耳畸形(IEM)对内耳植入(CI)手术并发症和结果的影响。
为了评估 IEM 对内耳植入(CI)结果的影响,从 863 名患者中选择了两组具有相似流行病学参数的患者。研究组(有 IEM 的患者)和对照组(内耳正常的患者)各有 25 名患者接受了 CI 并完成了至少 1 年的随访。术前和植入后至少 1 年评估了听觉表现、接受和表达语言技能以及言语的产生和使用。确定了每组中的手术并发症类型和修正手术率。
在研究组中,最常见的畸形是孤立性扩大的前庭水管(EVA)(44.8%)。总体而言,有 IEM 的患者听觉言语技能有显著改善。通常,具有正常耳蜗的患者比有 IEM 的患者得分明显更高(p<0.05)。与研究组相比,对照组的并发症发生率显著较低(p=0.001),但修正手术率无显著差异(p=0.637)。
尽管术后表现存在差异,但对于有 IEM 的患者,仍然可以通过 CI 来提高沟通能力。EVA、不完全分隔型 2 型和耳蜗发育不全型 2 型患者在听觉言语技能方面表现最好。与正常耳蜗的患者相比,有 IEM 的患者得分较低。手术期间最常见的并发症是脑脊液漏(喷涌或渗出),在不完全分隔型 3 型中很可能发生。