• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住房和城市发展部无烟规定的实施:管理员和居民看法的社会生态学定性评估。

Implementation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development's Smoke-Free Rule: A Socio-Ecological Qualitative Assessment of Administrator and Resident Perceptions.

机构信息

Department of Population Health Sciences, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Riverside Circle, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA.

Department of Public Health and Healthcare Leadership, Radford University Carilion, 101 Elm Avenue, SE, Roanoke, VA 24013, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 24;18(17):8908. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178908.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18178908
PMID:34501498
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8431491/
Abstract

In July 2018, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) implemented a mandatory smoke-free rule in public housing. This study assessed administrator and resident perceptions of rule implementation during its initial year in the District of Columbia Housing Authority (DCHA). Assessment included nine focus groups ( = 69) with residents and in-depth interviews with administrators ( = 7) and residents ( = 26) from 14 DCHA communities (family = 7 and senior/disabled = 7). Semi-structured discussion guides based on the multi-level socio-ecological framework captured dialogue that was recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded inductively. Emerging major themes for each socio-ecological framework level included: (1) Individual: the rule was supported due to perceived health benefits, with stronger support among non-smokers; (2) Interpersonal: limiting secondhand smoke exposure was perceived as a positive for vulnerable residents; (3) Organizational: communication, signage, and cessation support was perceived as a need; (4) Community: residents perceived mobility, disability, weather, and safety-related issues as barriers; and (5) Public Policy: lease amendments were perceived as enablers of rule implementation but expressed confusion about violations and enforcement. A majority of administrators and residents reported favorable implications of the mandated HUD rule. The novel application of a socio-ecological framework, however, detected implementation nuances that required improvements on multiple levels, including more signage, cessation support, clarification of enforcement roles, and addressing safety concerns.

摘要

2018 年 7 月,美国住房和城市发展部(HUD)在公共住房中实施了强制性禁烟令。本研究评估了哥伦比亚特区住房管理局(DCHA)在该禁烟令实施的初始一年内,管理人员和居民对该规定的看法。评估包括与居民进行的 9 个焦点小组(=69)和与管理人员(=7)以及来自 14 个 DCHA 社区的居民(=26)的深入访谈(家庭=7,老年/残疾=7)。基于多层次社会生态框架的半结构化讨论指南,记录了讨论内容,并进行了逐字转录和归纳编码。每个社会生态框架层面出现的主要主题包括:(1)个体:由于认为对健康有益,该规定得到了支持,不吸烟者的支持力度更强;(2)人际间:限制二手烟暴露被认为对弱势居民有益;(3)组织:沟通、标志和戒烟支持被认为是必要的;(4)社区:居民认为行动不便、残疾、天气和安全相关问题是障碍;(5)公共政策:租约修正案被认为是实施规定的推动者,但对违规和执法表示困惑。大多数管理人员和居民报告说,强制实施 HUD 规定带来了有利影响。然而,社会生态框架的新颖应用检测到了在多个层面上需要改进的实施细节,包括增加标志、戒烟支持、明确执法角色以及解决安全问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0b5/8431491/084485a30f90/ijerph-18-08908-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0b5/8431491/084485a30f90/ijerph-18-08908-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0b5/8431491/084485a30f90/ijerph-18-08908-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development's Smoke-Free Rule: A Socio-Ecological Qualitative Assessment of Administrator and Resident Perceptions.住房和城市发展部无烟规定的实施:管理员和居民看法的社会生态学定性评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 24;18(17):8908. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178908.
2
Developing Smoke-Free Policies in Public Housing: Perspectives From Early Adopters in 2 Southern States.在公共住房中制定无烟政策:来自 2 个南部州早期采用者的观点。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Jun 21;15:E83. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170427.
3
Perceptions about the Federally Mandated Smoke-Free Housing Policy among Residents Living in Public Housing in New York City.纽约市公租房居民对联邦强制无烟住房政策的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 20;15(10):2062. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102062.
4
Qualitative Assessment of Smoke-Free Policy Implementation in Low-Income Housing: Enhancing Resident Compliance.低收入住房无烟政策实施的定性评估:增强居民遵守情况。
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Jan;33(1):107-117. doi: 10.1177/0890117118776090. Epub 2018 May 17.
5
A protocol for measuring the impact of a smoke-free housing policy on indoor tobacco smoke exposure.测量无烟住房政策对室内烟草烟雾暴露影响的方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 30;19(1):666. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7043-3.
6
Assessment of Residents' Attitudes and Satisfaction Before and After Implementation of a Smoke-Free Policy in Boston Multiunit Housing.波士顿多单元住房实施无烟政策前后居民态度及满意度评估
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 May;18(5):1282-1289. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv239. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
7
Assessing Smoke-Free Housing Implementation Approaches to Inform Best Practices: A National Survey of Early-Adopting Public Housing Authorities.评估无烟住房实施方法以提供最佳实践:对早期采用公共住房管理局的全国调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 24;19(7):3854. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073854.
8
Increases in Secondhand Smoke After Going Smoke-Free: An Assessment of the Impact of a Mandated Smoke-Free Housing Policy.禁烟令后二手烟增加:对强制无烟住房政策影响的评估。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Dec 12;22(12):2254-2256. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa040.
9
Implementing the Federal Smoke-Free Public Housing Policy in New York City: Understanding Challenges and Opportunities for Improving Policy Impact.在纽约市实施联邦无烟公共住房政策:了解改善政策影响的挑战和机遇。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 29;18(23):12565. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312565.
10
Resident Support for the Federally Mandated Smoke-Free Rule in Public Housing: 2018-2022.居民对联邦政府在公共住房中实施禁烟令的支持:2018-2022 年。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jan 17;21(1):102. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21010102.

引用本文的文献

1
Resident Support for the Federally Mandated Smoke-Free Rule in Public Housing: 2018-2022.居民对联邦政府在公共住房中实施禁烟令的支持:2018-2022 年。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jan 17;21(1):102. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21010102.
2
A randomized control trial to support smoke-free policy compliance in public housing.一项支持公共住房禁烟政策合规性的随机对照试验。
Trials. 2023 Aug 22;24(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07339-4.
3
A Randomized Control Trial to support smoke-free policy compliance in public housing.一项支持公共住房无烟政策合规性的随机对照试验。

本文引用的文献

1
The HUD smoke-free rule: Perceptions of residents post-implementation.住房和城市发展部无烟规定:实施后居民的看法
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Jul 9;19:101159. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101159. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
'If I pay rent, I'm gonna smoke': Insights on the social contract of smokefree housing policy in affordable housing settings.“如果我要交房租,我就得吸烟”:经济适用房禁烟政策的社会契约洞察。
Health Place. 2019 Mar;56:106-117. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
3
Perceptions about the Federally Mandated Smoke-Free Housing Policy among Residents Living in Public Housing in New York City.
Res Sq. 2023 Apr 20:rs.3.rs-2701542. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2701542/v1.
4
Are excluding e-cigarettes a loophole in the smokefree public housing rule?将电子烟排除在外是否属于无烟公共住房规定中的一个漏洞?
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Nov 29;31:102069. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102069. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Behavioural intentions in response to a potential menthol cigarette sales ban: a survey examining smokers in Washington, DC public housing.对潜在薄荷醇香烟销售禁令的行为意向:一项在华盛顿特区公共住房中检查吸烟者的调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 13;12(7):e059821. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059821.
6
Current state of unhealthy living characteristics in Black/African American and Latino populations: Tobacco use.黑人和拉丁裔人群中不良生活特征的现状:烟草使用。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2022 Mar-Apr;71:27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
7
Smoking cessation intentions and attempts one year after the federally mandated smoke-free housing rule.联邦政府强制实施无烟住房规定一年后的戒烟意愿与尝试情况。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Oct 11;24:101600. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101600. eCollection 2021 Dec.
纽约市公租房居民对联邦强制无烟住房政策的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 20;15(10):2062. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102062.
4
Qualitative Assessment of Smoke-Free Policy Implementation in Low-Income Housing: Enhancing Resident Compliance.低收入住房无烟政策实施的定性评估:增强居民遵守情况。
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Jan;33(1):107-117. doi: 10.1177/0890117118776090. Epub 2018 May 17.
5
Cigarette smoking and adverse health outcomes among adults receiving federal housing assistance.接受联邦住房援助的成年人中的吸烟情况及不良健康后果。
Prev Med. 2017 Jun;99:171-177. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
6
Clearing the Air: Smoke-Free Housing Policies, Smoking, and Secondhand Smoke Exposure Among Affordable Housing Residents in Minnesota, 2014-2015.净化空气:2014 - 2015年明尼苏达州经济适用房居民的无烟住房政策、吸烟与二手烟暴露情况
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Aug 18;13:E111. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.160195.
7
Association between Florida's smoke-free policy and acute myocardial infarction by race: A time series analysis, 2000-2013.2000 - 2013年佛罗里达州无烟政策与不同种族急性心肌梗死之间的关联:一项时间序列分析
Prev Med. 2016 Nov;92:169-175. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.05.032. Epub 2016 May 31.
8
The impact of a smoke-free policy on environmental tobacco smoke exposure in public housing developments.无烟政策对公共住房开发区环境烟草烟雾暴露的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Jul 1;557-558:676-80. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.110. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
9
Assessment of Residents' Attitudes and Satisfaction Before and After Implementation of a Smoke-Free Policy in Boston Multiunit Housing.波士顿多单元住房实施无烟政策前后居民态度及满意度评估
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 May;18(5):1282-1289. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv239. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
10
A Smoke-Free Community Housing Policy: Changes in Reported Smoking Behaviour-Findings from Waterloo Region, Canada.一项无烟社区住房政策:报告的吸烟行为变化——来自加拿大滑铁卢地区的调查结果
J Community Health. 2015 Dec;40(6):1207-15. doi: 10.1007/s10900-015-0050-0.