• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大用于公开报告医院绩效的急性心肌梗死死亡率和再入院模型的开发。

Development of Acute Myocardial Infarction Mortality and Readmission Models for Public Reporting on Hospital Performance in Canada.

作者信息

Ko Dennis T, Ahmed Tareq, Austin Peter C, Cantor Warren J, Dorian Paul, Goldfarb Michael, Gong Yanyan, Graham Michelle M, Gu Jing, Hawkins Nathaniel M, Huynh Thao, Humphries Karin H, Koh Maria, Lamarche Yoan, Lambert Laurie J, Lawler Patrick R, Légaré Jean-Francois, Ly Hung Q, Qiu Feng, Quraishi Ata Ur Rehman, So Derek Y, Welsh Robert C, Wijeysundera Harindra C, Wong Graham, Yan Andrew T, Gurevich Yana

机构信息

Schulich Heart Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

CJC Open. 2021 May 1;3(8):1051-1059. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.04.012. eCollection 2021 Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.cjco.2021.04.012
PMID:34505045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8413230/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Given changes in the care and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients over the past several decades, we sought to develop prediction models that could be used to generate accurate risk-adjusted mortality and readmission outcomes for hospitals in current practice across Canada.

METHODS

A Canadian national expert panel was convened to define appropriate AMI patients for reporting and develop prediction models. Preliminary candidate variable evaluation was conducted using Ontario patients hospitalized with a most responsible diagnosis of AMI from April 1, 2015 to March 31, 2018. National data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information was used to develop AMI prediction models. The main outcomes were 30-day all-cause in-hospital mortality and 30-day urgent all-cause readmission. Discrimination of these models (measured by c-statistics) was compared with that of existing Canadian Institute for Health Information models in the same study cohort.

RESULTS

The AMI mortality model was assessed in 54,240 Ontario AMI patients and 153,523 AMI patients across Canada. We observed a 30-day in-hospital mortality rate of 6.3%, and a 30-day all-cause urgent readmission rate of 10.7% in Canada. The final Canadian AMI mortality model included 12 variables and had a c-statistic of 0.834. For readmission, the model had 13 variables and a c-statistic of 0.679. Discrimination of the new AMI models had higher c-statistics compared with existing models (c-statistic 0.814 for mortality; 0.673 for readmission).

CONCLUSIONS

In this national collaboration, we developed mortality and readmission models that are suitable for profiling performance of hospitals treating AMI patients in Canada.

摘要

背景

鉴于过去几十年急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的护理和治疗结果发生了变化,我们试图开发预测模型,以用于为加拿大当前实际运营中的医院生成准确的风险调整死亡率和再入院结果。

方法

召集了一个加拿大国家专家小组,以确定适合报告的AMI患者并开发预测模型。使用2015年4月1日至2018年3月31日因最主要诊断为AMI而住院的安大略省患者进行初步候选变量评估。利用加拿大卫生信息研究所的全国数据开发AMI预测模型。主要结局为30天全因院内死亡率和30天紧急全因再入院率。在同一研究队列中,将这些模型的区分度(用c统计量衡量)与加拿大卫生信息研究所现有模型的区分度进行比较。

结果

在安大略省的54240例AMI患者和加拿大全国的153523例AMI患者中对AMI死亡率模型进行了评估。我们观察到加拿大的30天院内死亡率为6.3%,30天全因紧急再入院率为10.7%。最终的加拿大AMI死亡率模型包含12个变量,c统计量为0.834。对于再入院,该模型有13个变量,c统计量为0.679。与现有模型相比,新的AMI模型的区分度具有更高的c统计量(死亡率的c统计量为0.814;再入院的c统计量为0.673)。

结论

在这项全国性合作中,我们开发了死亡率和再入院模型,适用于剖析加拿大治疗AMI患者的医院的表现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffac/8413230/18d98c457b20/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffac/8413230/b51f723f2733/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffac/8413230/18d98c457b20/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffac/8413230/b51f723f2733/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffac/8413230/18d98c457b20/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of Acute Myocardial Infarction Mortality and Readmission Models for Public Reporting on Hospital Performance in Canada.加拿大用于公开报告医院绩效的急性心肌梗死死亡率和再入院模型的开发。
CJC Open. 2021 May 1;3(8):1051-1059. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.04.012. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
Acute Myocardial Infarction Readmission Risk Prediction Models: A Systematic Review of Model Performance.急性心肌梗死再入院风险预测模型:模型性能的系统评价
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Jan;11(1):e003885. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003885.
3
Readmission and Mortality After Hospitalization for Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure.心肌梗死和心力衰竭住院后的再入院和死亡率。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Feb 25;75(7):736-746. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.026.
4
Quality of Acute Myocardial Infarction Care in Canada: A 10-Year Review of 30-Day In-Hospital Mortality and 30-Day Hospital Readmission.加拿大急性心肌梗死治疗质量:30 天院内死亡率和 30 天内再入院率的 10 年回顾。
Can J Cardiol. 2017 Oct;33(10):1319-1326. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
5
Thirty-Day Readmission Risk Model for Older Adults Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction.老年急性心肌梗死住院患者30天再入院风险模型
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 May;12(5):e005320. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005320.
6
Educational level and 30-day outcomes after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction in Italy.意大利急性心肌梗死后住院治疗的教育水平与30天预后
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 9;17(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1966-5.
7
Community factors, hospital characteristics and inter-regional outcome variations following acute myocardial infarction in Canada.加拿大急性心肌梗死后的社区因素、医院特征及地区间结局差异
Can J Cardiol. 2005 Mar;21(3):247-55.
8
National patterns of risk-standardized mortality and readmission after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia: update on publicly reported outcomes measures based on the 2013 release.急性心肌梗死、心力衰竭和肺炎住院后风险标准化死亡率及再入院率的全国模式:基于2013年发布数据的公开报告结局指标更新
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Oct;29(10):1333-40. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2862-5. Epub 2014 May 14.
9
An administrative claims measure suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day all-cause readmission rates among patients with acute myocardial infarction.一种适用于根据急性心肌梗死患者30天全因再入院率来剖析医院绩效的行政索赔衡量方法。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011 Mar;4(2):243-52. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.957498.
10
Association of Do-Not-Resuscitate Patient Case Mix With Publicly Reported Risk-Standardized Hospital Mortality and Readmission Rates.不复苏患者病例组合与公开报告的风险标准化医院死亡率和再入院率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2010383. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10383.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-Sensing with Hollow Cylindrical Transducers for Histotripsy-Enhanced Aspiration Mechanical Thrombectomy Applications.用于组织粉碎增强抽吸机械血栓切除术的空心圆柱形换能器自感知
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Sep 2;25(17):5417. doi: 10.3390/s25175417.
2
CArdiovasculaR Outcomes Based Upon EjectIon Systolic TimE in Patients With ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (ARISE-STEMI) Study.基于ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者射血收缩期时间的心血管结局(ARISE-STEMI)研究
CJC Open. 2024 Nov 26;7(4):516-524. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2024.11.014. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Resource Utilization and Costs Associated With Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Myocardial Infarction: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Calibration and discrimination of the Framingham Risk Score and the Pooled Cohort Equations.弗雷明汉风险评分和队列研究方程的校准和判别。
CMAJ. 2020 Apr 27;192(17):E442-E449. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.190848.
2
Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Readmission After Acute Myocardial Infarction Using Routinely Collected Clinical Data.使用常规临床数据评估机器学习算法预测急性心肌梗死后再入院。
Can J Cardiol. 2020 Jun;36(6):878-885. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.10.023. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
3
Readmission and Mortality After Hospitalization for Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure.
与心肌梗死并发的心源性休克相关的资源利用和成本:一项基于人群的队列研究。
JACC Adv. 2024 Jul 2;3(8):101047. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101047. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Mental health sequelae in survivors of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction. A population-based cohort study.心肌梗死后心源性休克幸存者的心理健康后遗症。一项基于人群的队列研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Jun;50(6):901-912. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07399-3. Epub 2024 May 2.
心肌梗死和心力衰竭住院后的再入院和死亡率。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Feb 25;75(7):736-746. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.026.
4
Data variability across Canadian administrative health databases: Differences in content, coding, and completeness.加拿大行政健康数据库中的数据变异性:内容、编码和完整性方面的差异。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Jan;29 Suppl 1:68-77. doi: 10.1002/pds.4889. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
5
Acute Myocardial Infarction Readmission Risk Prediction Models: A Systematic Review of Model Performance.急性心肌梗死再入院风险预测模型:模型性能的系统评价
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Jan;11(1):e003885. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003885.
6
Acute myocardial infarction hospital admissions and deaths in England: a national follow-back and follow-forward record-linkage study.英格兰急性心肌梗死住院患者和死亡病例:一项全国性随访回溯和随访前瞻性记录链接研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Apr;2(4):e191-e201. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30032-4. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
7
Association of Changing Hospital Readmission Rates With Mortality Rates After Hospital Discharge.医院再入院率变化与出院后死亡率的关联
JAMA. 2017 Jul 18;318(3):270-278. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.8444.
8
Public Reporting II: State of the Art-Current Public Reporting in Cardiovascular Medicine.公共报告II:心血管医学领域的最新技术——当前的公共报告
Circulation. 2017 May 9;135(19):1772-1774. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.026553.
9
Association of Clinical Factors and Therapeutic Strategies With Improvements in Survival Following Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, 2003-2013.2003-2013 年非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者生存改善与临床因素和治疗策略的关系。
JAMA. 2016 Sep 13;316(10):1073-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.10766.
10
Readmissions, Observation, and the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program.再入院、观察和医院再入院率降低计划。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 21;374(16):1543-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1513024. Epub 2016 Feb 24.