Suppr超能文献

烟雾健康成本与野火燃料管理的计算:一项建模研究。

Smoke health costs and the calculus for wildfires fuel management: a modelling study.

作者信息

Borchers-Arriagada Nicolas, Bowman David M J S, Price Owen, Palmer Andrew J, Samson Stephanie, Clarke Hamish, Sepulveda Gonzalo, Johnston Fay H

机构信息

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia; New South Wales Bushfire Risk Management Research Hub, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.

School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.

出版信息

Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Sep;5(9):e608-e619. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00198-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Smoke from uncontrolled wildfires and deliberately set prescribed burns has the potential to produce substantial population exposure to fine particulate matter (PM). We aimed to estimate historical health costs attributable to smoke-related PM from all landscape fires combined, and the relative contributions from wildfires and prescribed burns, in New South Wales, Australia.

METHODS

We quantified PM from all landscape fire smoke (LFS) and estimated the attributable health burden and daily health costs between July 1, 2000, and June 30, 2020, for all of New South Wales and by smaller geographical regions. We combined these results with a spatial database of landscape fires to estimate the relative total and per hectare health costs attributable to PM from wildfire smoke (WFS) and prescribed burning smoke (PBS).

FINDINGS

We estimated health costs of AU$ 2013 million (95% CI 718-3354; calculated with the 2018 value of the AU$). $1653 million (82·1%) of costs were attributable to WFS and $361 million (17·9%) to PBS. The per hectare health cost was of $105 for all LFS days ($104 for WFS and $477 for PBS). In sensitivity analyses, the per hectare costs associated with PBS was consistently higher than for WFS under a range of different scenarios.

INTERPRETATION

WFS and PBS produce substantial health costs. Total health costs are higher for WFS, but per hectare costs are higher for PBS. This should be considered when assessing the trade-offs between prescribed burns and wildfires.

FUNDING

None.

摘要

背景

未加控制的野火以及故意进行的计划烧除所产生的烟雾,有可能使大量人群暴露于细颗粒物(PM)之中。我们旨在估算澳大利亚新南威尔士州因各类景观火灾产生的与烟雾相关的PM所致的历史健康成本,以及野火和计划烧除各自的相对贡献。

方法

我们对所有景观火灾烟雾中的PM进行了量化,并估算了2000年7月1日至2020年6月30日期间新南威尔士州全境及较小地理区域内可归因的健康负担和每日健康成本。我们将这些结果与景观火灾的空间数据库相结合,以估算因野火烟雾(WFS)和计划烧除烟雾(PBS)中的PM所致的相对总健康成本和每公顷健康成本。

研究结果

我们估算出健康成本为20.13亿澳元(95%CI 7.18 - 33.54;按2018年澳元价值计算)。其中16.53亿澳元(82.1%)的成本归因于WFS,3.61亿澳元(17.9%)归因于PBS。所有景观火灾烟雾日的每公顷健康成本为105澳元(WFS为104澳元,PBS为477澳元)。在敏感性分析中,在一系列不同情景下,与PBS相关的每公顷成本始终高于WFS。

解读

WFS和PBS都会产生巨大的健康成本。WFS的总健康成本更高,但PBS的每公顷成本更高。在评估计划烧除和野火之间的权衡时应考虑到这一点。

资金来源

无。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验