Gordon Luke, Evans Maldwyn John, Zylstra Philip, Lindenmayer David B
Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
School of Molecular and Life Sciences (MLS), Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia.
Environ Manage. 2025 Apr;75(4):746-760. doi: 10.1007/s00267-025-02119-z. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
Prescribed burning is a key tool in land management globally used to reduce wildfire risks and achieve ecological, cultural and resource management objectives across both natural and human systems. Despite its widespread application, research on prescribed burning is marked by significant gaps. Subsequently, we posed the following research questions: (1) What are the key research topics that define international, peer-reviewed literature on prescribed burning? (2) What are the temporal and spatial trends of these topics? (3) What are the relationships between the national income of a given country and the trends in research topics? And, (4) What are the most salient knowledge gaps in peer-reviewed prescribed burning research, and how can they be addressed? We used structural topic modelling and geoparsing to conduct a detailed text analysis of 7878 peer-reviewed articles on prescribed burning. We revealed that research on prescribed burning is dominated by studies from high-income countries, particularly the United States. This highlights a geographical bias that may skew global understanding and application of prescribed burning practices. Our topic modelling revealed the most prevalent topics to be Fire Regimes and Landscape Biodiversity Management, whilst topics such as Air Pollution & Health, and Wildfire Risk Management gained prominence in recent years. Our analysis highlighted a disconnect between forestry-related research and broader landscape management topics. This finding emphasises the need for more interdisciplinary research, and research on the use and effects of prescribed burning in diverse ecosystems and underrepresented regions, particularly in the context of climate change.
计划火烧是全球土地管理中的一项关键工具,用于降低野火风险,并在自然和人类系统中实现生态、文化及资源管理目标。尽管其应用广泛,但关于计划火烧的研究仍存在显著空白。随后,我们提出了以下研究问题:(1)界定国际同行评审的计划火烧文献的关键研究主题有哪些?(2)这些主题的时间和空间趋势是怎样的?(3)特定国家的国民收入与研究主题趋势之间有何关系?以及,(4)同行评审的计划火烧研究中最突出的知识空白是什么,如何解决这些空白?我们使用结构主题建模和地理解析方法,对7878篇关于计划火烧的同行评审文章进行了详细的文本分析。我们发现,关于计划火烧的研究主要由高收入国家的研究主导,尤其是美国。这凸显了一种地理偏差,可能会扭曲全球对计划火烧实践的理解和应用。我们的主题建模显示,最普遍的主题是火灾 regime和景观生物多样性管理,而空气污染与健康以及野火风险管理等主题近年来变得更加突出。我们的分析强调了林业相关研究与更广泛的景观管理主题之间的脱节。这一发现强调了需要开展更多跨学科研究,以及研究计划火烧在不同生态系统和代表性不足地区的使用和影响,特别是在气候变化背景下。