• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国医疗机构在紧急避孕方面的实践变化。

Changes in U.S. Healthcare Provider Practices Related to Emergency Contraception.

机构信息

Division of Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

Division of Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Womens Health Issues. 2021 Nov-Dec;31(6):560-566. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2021.07.006. Epub 2021 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2021.07.006
PMID:34511322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11079952/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Emergency contraception (EC), including EC pills (ECPs) and the copper intrauterine device, can prevent pregnancy after sexual encounters in which contraception was not used or used incorrectly. The U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use (U.S. SPR), initially released in 2013, provides evidence-based clinical recommendations on the provision of EC. The objective of this analysis was to assess the percentage of health care providers reporting frequent provision of select EC practices around the time of and after the release of the U.S. SPR.

METHODS

We conducted two cross-sectional mailed surveys using different nationwide samples of office-based physicians and public-sector providers in 2013 and 2014 (n = 2,060) and 2019 (n = 1,420). We compared the percentage of providers reporting frequent provision of select EC practices by time period, overall, and by provider type.

RESULTS

In 2019, few providers frequently provided an advance prescription for ECPs (16%), an advance supply of ECPs (7%), or the copper intrauterine device as EC (8%), although 41% frequently provided or prescribed regular contraception at the same time as providing ECPs. Providers in 2019 were more likely than providers in 2013 and 2014 to provide or prescribe contraception at the same time as providing ECPs (adjusted prevalence ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.001-1.59) and to provide a copper intrauterine device as EC (adjusted prevalence ratio, 3.87; 95% confidence interval 2.10-7.15); there were no other significant differences by time period.

CONCLUSIONS

Few providers report frequent implementation of recommended EC practices. Understanding the barriers faced by providers and clinics in implementing these practices may improve access to EC.

摘要

简介

紧急避孕(EC),包括 EC 丸(ECP)和铜宫内节育器,可在性行为中未使用或使用不当避孕后预防怀孕。美国选择的避孕使用实践推荐(U.S. SPR)于 2013 年首次发布,提供了关于提供 EC 的基于证据的临床建议。本分析的目的是评估在 U.S. SPR 发布前后,报告经常提供特定 EC 实践的医疗保健提供者的百分比。

方法

我们在 2013 年和 2014 年(n=2060)以及 2019 年(n=1420)使用不同的全国性门诊医生和公共部门提供者样本进行了两次横断面邮寄调查。我们比较了报告经常提供特定 EC 实践的提供者的百分比,按时间段、总体和提供者类型进行比较。

结果

2019 年,很少有提供者经常提供 ECP 的预先处方(16%)、预先供应 ECP(7%)或铜宫内节育器作为 EC(8%),尽管 41%的人在提供 ECP 的同时经常提供或开常规避孕处方。与 2013 年和 2014 年相比,2019 年的提供者更有可能在提供 ECP 的同时提供或开避孕处方(调整后流行率比,1.26;95%置信区间,1.001-1.59),并且更有可能提供铜宫内节育器作为 EC(调整后流行率比,3.87;95%置信区间,2.10-7.15);没有其他时间段的显著差异。

结论

很少有提供者报告经常实施推荐的 EC 实践。了解提供者和诊所在实施这些实践方面面临的障碍可能会改善 EC 的可及性。

相似文献

1
Changes in U.S. Healthcare Provider Practices Related to Emergency Contraception.美国医疗机构在紧急避孕方面的实践变化。
Womens Health Issues. 2021 Nov-Dec;31(6):560-566. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2021.07.006. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
2
Exploring young women's reasons for adopting intrauterine or oral emergency contraception in the United States: a qualitative study.探究美国年轻女性采用宫内或口服紧急避孕措施的原因:一项定性研究
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Jan 28;20(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-0886-z.
3
Access to emergency contraception in Kansas City clinics.堪萨斯城诊所的紧急避孕措施的可及性。
Contraception. 2018 Dec;98(6):482-485. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
4
Emergency contraception: A multispecialty survey of clinician knowledge and practices.紧急避孕:临床医生知识与实践的多专业调查
Contraception. 2016 Feb;93(2):145-52. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
5
Health Care Provider Attitudes and Practices Related to 'Quick Start' Provision of Combined Hormonal Contraception and Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate to Adolescents.卫生保健提供者与向青少年提供“快速启动”联合激素避孕和醋酸甲羟孕酮长效避孕针相关的态度和做法。
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Feb;64(2):211-218. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
6
Emergency contraception: a review.紧急避孕:综述
Minerva Ginecol. 2014 Dec;66(6):551-64. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
7
Interventions for emergency contraception.紧急避孕的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 2;8(8):CD001324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001324.pub5.
8
Interventions for emergency contraception.紧急避孕的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 20;1(1):CD001324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001324.pub6.
9
The politics of place: Presidential voting patterns and providers' prescription of emergency contraception.地点政治学:总统选举模式与提供者开处紧急避孕药。
Contraception. 2018 Sep;98(3):237-242. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 May 18.
10
Emergency contraception: Links between providers' counseling choices, prescribing behaviors, and sociopolitical context.紧急避孕:提供者咨询选择、处方行为与社会政治环境之间的联系。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Dec;242:112588. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112588. Epub 2019 Oct 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Current Contraceptive Status Among Women Aged 15-49: United States, 2017-2019.2017-2019 年美国 15-49 岁女性的当前避孕状况。
NCHS Data Brief. 2020 Oct(388):1-8.
2
Exploring young women's reasons for adopting intrauterine or oral emergency contraception in the United States: a qualitative study.探究美国年轻女性采用宫内或口服紧急避孕措施的原因:一项定性研究
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Jan 28;20(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-0886-z.
3
Emergency Contraception.紧急避孕。
Pediatrics. 2019 Dec;144(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3149. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
4
Health Care Provider Attitudes about the Safety of "Quick Start" Initiation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents.医疗保健提供者对青少年“快速启动”长效可逆避孕措施安全性的态度。
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019 Aug;32(4):402-408. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
5
Association of Short Interpregnancy Interval With Pregnancy Outcomes According to Maternal Age.短间隔妊娠与母婴年龄相关的妊娠结局的关系。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1661-1670. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4696.
6
Access to emergency contraception in Kansas City clinics.堪萨斯城诊所的紧急避孕措施的可及性。
Contraception. 2018 Dec;98(6):482-485. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
7
Seeking emergency contraception in the United States: A review of access and barriers.在美国寻求紧急避孕措施:获取途径与障碍综述
Women Health. 2019 Apr;59(4):364-374. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2018.1487905. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
8
The intrauterine device as emergency contraception: how much do young women know?宫内节育器作为紧急避孕措施:年轻女性了解多少?
Contraception. 2018 Apr 18. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.04.009.
9
Health Care Provider Perceptions of the Safety of IUDs for Women with HIV.卫生保健提供者对 HIV 感染妇女使用宫内节育器安全性的认知。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2018 Jun;50(2):67-73. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12056. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
10
Emergency Contraception.紧急避孕
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2017 Nov-Dec;46(6):886-888. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2017.09.004.