Suppr超能文献

中国和欧盟工作场所健康与安全的参考框架:一项比较研究。

A reference framework for health and safety in the workplace in China and the European Union: A comparative study.

机构信息

School of Management and Economics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, P.R. China.

Department Building Construction, University of Granada, Advanced Technical School for Building Engineering, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Work. 2021;70(1):247-261. doi: 10.3233/WOR-213569.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) has a direct repercussion on the work, social and economic environments. The regulatory frameworks developed by each country are a basic aspect of OHS action policies.

OBJECTIVE

This study analyses and compares the differences in OHS regulations in China and the European Union (EU) to identify weaknesses or gaps in the Chinese regulations.

METHODS

Firstly, an overview of the OHS situation in the EU and China is carried out to provide context. Following this, a comparison of OHS regulations is conducted by searching different European and Chinese databases. The comparison focuses on several areas: socio-economic issues, accident rates, and the OHS regulatory framework.

RESULTS

Since 1989, the EU has produced a broad and comprehensive OHS regulatory framework. Almost 30 years later, its positive impact can be seen in EU accident rates, indicating that this framework might be used as a reference for other territories or countries. China has a complicated system with over 280 OHS legislative regulations, in the form of laws, regulations, rules, integrated regulations, etc. that lead to a mixture and repetition of contents.

CONCLUSIONS

The Chinese OHS legislation is still being constructed and complemented, since the two main Chinese OHS laws were approved during the last decade. This contrasts with the mature European framework, as it has been modified and completed over the years.

摘要

背景

职业健康与安全(Occupational Health and Safety,OHS)直接影响工作、社会和经济环境。每个国家制定的监管框架是 OHS 行动政策的基本方面。

目的

本研究分析和比较中国与欧盟(European Union,EU)的 OHS 法规差异,以确定中国法规中的薄弱或差距。

方法

首先,对欧盟和中国的 OHS 情况进行概述,提供背景信息。然后,通过搜索不同的欧洲和中国数据库,对 OHS 法规进行比较。比较侧重于以下几个方面:社会经济问题、事故率和 OHS 监管框架。

结果

自 1989 年以来,欧盟制定了广泛而全面的 OHS 监管框架。近 30 年后,其在欧盟事故率方面的积极影响表明,该框架可能被其他地区或国家用作参考。中国的 OHS 立法系统复杂,有 280 多项立法法规,以法律、法规、规章、综合规章等形式存在,导致内容的混合和重复。

结论

中国的 OHS 立法仍在构建和补充中,因为过去十年中批准了两项主要的中国 OHS 法律。这与成熟的欧洲框架形成对比,因为它多年来一直在修改和完善。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验