• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧盟的人工智能与机器人技术——我们是否应该修改职业健康与安全法?

Artificial intelligence and robotisation in the EU - should we change OHS law?

作者信息

Jarota Maciej

机构信息

Department of Labour Law and Social Security Law, Institute of Law, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Al. Raclawickie 14, 20-950, Lublin, Poland.

出版信息

J Occup Med Toxicol. 2021 May 5;16(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12995-021-00301-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12995-021-00301-7
PMID:33952297
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8097897/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Technological progress in the twenty-first century offers real chances for economic development of the European Union (EU). The purpose of this publication is to analyse risks and threats relating to Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) considerations in the context of scientific and technological development. The article attempts the analysis of whether current legislation of the European Union enables good protection of workers' health in the performance of their duties using robots, artificial intelligence (AI). A feature of robotisation and AI may be new challenges in OHS protection. The analysis performed aims to determine whether threats posted by working with Artificial Intelligence are serious enough for the EU Legislator to focus on implementation of new OHS regulations.

METHODS

The analysis was carried out on the basis of current legal regulations related to the protection of employee's health in the European Union. The study used literature related to robotisation with artificial intelligence and health and safety at work in the working environment.

RESULTS

Given the new psychological and physical threats related to the use of AI robots, it is necessary to expand the EU legislation with general guidelines for the use of intelligent robots in the work environment. Indeed, such robots must be defined in the applicable legal framework. Employers should also define, as part of their internal regulations, the procedures for employee communication with artificial intelligence, and relevantly update their training in the OHS area.

CONCLUSIONS

The developments in AI-assisted robots come with inherent risks and threats to the working environment. New challenges create the need for adapting EU laws to changing reality. In order to structure European Union legislation on health and safety at work, these changes could be defined in a single piece of legislation covering robotics and AI after detailed analysis, dialogue, and debate.

摘要

背景

21世纪的技术进步为欧盟的经济发展提供了切实机遇。本出版物的目的是分析在科技发展背景下与职业健康和安全(OHS)考量相关的风险和威胁。本文试图分析欧盟现行立法是否能够在工人使用机器人、人工智能(AI)履行职责时很好地保护他们的健康。机器人化和人工智能的一个特点可能是在职业健康与安全保护方面带来新的挑战。所进行的分析旨在确定与人工智能一起工作所带来的威胁是否严重到足以让欧盟立法者专注于实施新的职业健康与安全法规。

方法

该分析基于欧盟现行的与保护员工健康相关的法律法规进行。该研究使用了与人工智能机器人化以及工作环境中的健康与安全相关的文献。

结果

鉴于与使用人工智能机器人相关的新的心理和身体威胁,有必要扩展欧盟立法,纳入在工作环境中使用智能机器人的一般准则。事实上,此类机器人必须在适用的法律框架中予以定义。雇主还应在其内部规定中确定员工与人工智能沟通的程序,并相应更新他们在职业健康与安全领域的培训。

结论

人工智能辅助机器人的发展给工作环境带来了内在风险和威胁。新的挑战使得有必要使欧盟法律适应不断变化的现实。为了构建欧盟关于工作场所健康与安全的立法,在经过详细分析、对话和辩论后,这些变化可以在一项涵盖机器人技术和人工智能的单一立法中予以明确。

相似文献

1
Artificial intelligence and robotisation in the EU - should we change OHS law?欧盟的人工智能与机器人技术——我们是否应该修改职业健康与安全法?
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2021 May 5;16(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12995-021-00301-7.
2
[Artificial Intelligence and employee's health - new challenges].[人工智能与员工健康——新挑战]
Med Pr. 2023 Sep 8;74(3):227-233. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.01422. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
3
A reference framework for health and safety in the workplace in China and the European Union: A comparative study.中国和欧盟工作场所健康与安全的参考框架:一项比较研究。
Work. 2021;70(1):247-261. doi: 10.3233/WOR-213569.
4
[Health and safety challenges in medical entities and the powers of the social labor inspector: Lessons related to the COVID-19 outbreak in the context of internal control of employee health and safety].[医疗实体中的健康与安全挑战以及社会劳动监察员的权力:在员工健康与安全内部控制背景下与新冠疫情相关的教训]
Med Pr. 2023 Nov 14;74(4):301-316. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.01347. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
5
[Legal protection of employee health when working with nanoparticles. Comments on the appropriateness of introducing european legal regulations].[纳米颗粒作业时员工健康的法律保护。关于引入欧洲法律法规适当性的评论]
Med Pr. 2019 Sep 18;70(5):633-647. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.00866. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
6
Artificial intelligence as a medical device in radiology: ethical and regulatory issues in Europe and the United States.人工智能作为放射学中的医疗设备:欧美地区的伦理与监管问题
Insights Imaging. 2018 Oct;9(5):745-753. doi: 10.1007/s13244-018-0645-y. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
7
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责
8
Marijuana in the Workplace: Guidance for Occupational Health Professionals and Employers: Joint Guidance Statement of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses and the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.工作场所中的大麻:职业健康专业人员和雇主指南:美国职业健康护士协会与美国职业与环境医学学院联合指南声明
Workplace Health Saf. 2015 Apr;63(4):139-64. doi: 10.1177/2165079915581983. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
9
Apples, oranges, robots: four misunderstandings in today's debate on the legal status of AI systems.苹果、橙子、机器人:当今人工智能系统法律地位辩论中的四个误解。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2018 Oct 15;376(2133):20180168. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2018.0168.
10
European activities in radiation protection in medicine.欧洲在医学辐射防护方面的活动。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015 Jul;165(1-4):34-8. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncv031. Epub 2015 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The evolution of new and emerging occupational health and safety risks: A qualitative review.新型和新兴职业健康与安全风险的演变:定性回顾。
Work. 2024;79(2):503-521. doi: 10.3233/WOR-230005.
2
The Cybersecurity and the Care Robots: A Viewpoint on the Open Problems and the Perspectives.网络安全与护理机器人:关于开放性问题及前景的观点
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Nov 29;9(12):1653. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9121653.
3
Roboethics principles and policies in Europe and North America.欧洲和北美的机器人伦理原则与政策。
SN Appl Sci. 2021;3(12):857. doi: 10.1007/s42452-021-04853-5. Epub 2021 Nov 7.

本文引用的文献

1
[Legal protection of employee health when working with nanoparticles. Comments on the appropriateness of introducing european legal regulations].[纳米颗粒作业时员工健康的法律保护。关于引入欧洲法律法规适当性的评论]
Med Pr. 2019 Sep 18;70(5):633-647. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.00866. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
2
The Relationship between Robot's Nonverbal Behaviour and Human's Likability Based on Human's Personality.基于人类个性的机器人非言语行为与人类喜好度之间的关系。
Sci Rep. 2018 May 30;8(1):8435. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25314-x.
3
Augmented reality and haptic interfaces for robot-assisted surgery.增强现实和触觉接口在机器人辅助手术中的应用。
Int J Med Robot. 2012 Mar;8(1):45-56. doi: 10.1002/rcs.421. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
4
Corporate social responsibility for nanotechnology oversight.纳米技术监管的企业社会责任。
Med Health Care Philos. 2011 Nov;14(4):407-19. doi: 10.1007/s11019-011-9330-3.
5
Transnational models for regulation of nanotechnology.纳米技术监管的跨国模式。
J Law Med Ethics. 2006 Winter;34(4):714-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00091.x.
6
Use of robotics in health procedures--are we ready for it?机器人技术在医疗程序中的应用——我们准备好了吗?
Hosp Top. 2003 Winter;81(1):33-5. doi: 10.1080/00185860309598014.