Changes in the Mean Intrahepatic Target Computed Tomography Attenuation Value During Treatment May Be a Useful New Predictor of the Post-progression Survival Associated with Lenvatinib Treatment.

Objective The relationship between the prognosis and magnitude of a decrease in tumor blood flow according to estimated tumor differentiation remains unclear. This study investigated the relationship between reductions in the rate of mean computed tomography (CT) attenuation values and the clinical prognosis. Methods We evaluated 63 consecutive patients who received lenvatinib treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The oncological aggressiveness of the tumors was estimated using classification by dynamic CT enhancement patterns. The utility of changes in mean CT attenuation values of intra-hepatic targets during treatment to estimate the prognosis was investigated by calculating the progression-free survival (PFS) and post-progression survival (PPS). A multivariate analysis was used to identify potential confounders for the survival after progression during lenvatinib therapy. Results The rate of decrease in the mean CT attenuation value gradually increased according to the degree of deterioration in estimated tumor differentiation, and the rate of a decrease in attenuation ≥40% showed a tendency to increase (p=0.064). This trend was reflected by a better objective response in oncological aggressiveness heterogeneous enhancement patterns (Type-3 and Type-4) than a homogeneous enhancement pattern (Type-2) (83% vs. 56% of modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors). This resulted in a similar PFS between the groups (p=0.773), whereas the PPS was significantly worse when the rate of decrease in the attenuation value was ≥40% (p=0.012). A multivariate analysis confirmed that a rate of decease in attenuation value ≥40% was a poor prognostic factor for the PPS (hazard ratio, 2.993; 95% confidence interval, 1.196-7.490; p=0.019). Conclusion A rate of decrease in attenuation ≥40% may reflect a good response of a highly malignant tumor to lenvatinib. Therefore, this value may have utility as a surrogate marker for estimating the oncological aggressiveness of tumors and their associated prognosis.