Rutland Suzanne D
Department of Hebrew, Biblical and Jewish Studies, School of Languages and Cultures, A18, University of Sydney, Sydney, 2006 Australia.
Contemp Jew. 2021;41(1):247-272. doi: 10.1007/s12397-021-09391-1. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
Compared to other parts of the Jewish world, Australia has handled the COVID-19 situation well, going into full lockdown early, with fewer deaths on a population basis. At the same time, there were significant differences in terms of the impact of the second wave of the pandemic in Melbourne and Sydney. This qualitative study examines how these two major Jewish centers, where 84% of the Jews in Australia reside, responded to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. It will discuss the policies that were put in place to assist those in need, with a range of different activities, including Jewish schools, going on-line, leading to many more opportunities to access news and participate in learning sessions. This study will highlight the similarities and differences between the two centers in terms of their organizational structures, which developed out of different historical migration patterns, and how these impacted on the current responses to the pandemic. The Sydney Jewish community has a centralized system of fundraising, planning and management in contrast to Melbourne, where the challenging situation created the need for better coordination. This was spearheaded by Jewish Care Victoria, which subsequently argued for a more permanent system of coordinated fundraising, planning and management for Melbourne Jewry. This article, which examines these developments, is based on oral interviews, written communications, community and media commentary, as well as historical material. As the Melbourne-based editor of , Zeddy Lawrence, commented, "the community did not decline but thrived," indicating its "resourcefulness," but it remains to be seen if this has any long-term impact on the community structure of Melbourne Jewry.
与犹太世界的其他地区相比,澳大利亚在应对新冠疫情方面表现出色,早早进入全面封锁状态,按人口比例计算死亡人数较少。与此同时,墨尔本和悉尼在第二波疫情的影响方面存在显著差异。这项定性研究考察了澳大利亚84%的犹太人居住的这两个主要犹太中心在2020年对新冠疫情的应对举措。它将探讨为帮助有需要的人而实施的政策,开展了一系列不同的活动,包括犹太学校上线,这带来了更多获取新闻和参加学习课程的机会。本研究将凸显这两个中心在组织结构方面的异同,其组织结构源于不同的历史移民模式,以及这些模式如何影响了当前对疫情的应对。与墨尔本不同,悉尼犹太社区有一个集中的筹款、规划和管理系统,在墨尔本,具有挑战性的形势催生了更好协调的需求。这是由维多利亚犹太关爱组织牵头的,该组织随后主张为墨尔本犹太人建立一个更永久性的协调筹款、规划和管理系统。本文基于口头访谈、书面交流、社区和媒体评论以及历史资料对这些发展情况进行了考察。正如总部位于墨尔本的《》编辑泽迪·劳伦斯所评论的,“社区没有衰落而是繁荣起来了”,这表明了其“足智多谋”,但这对墨尔本犹太人的社区结构是否有任何长期影响还有待观察。