• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

压电手术与传统旋转器械在施奈德膜窦提升术中的比较:一项初步随机试验。

Comparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotary instruments in schneider's membrane sinus lifting: A pilot randomized trial.

作者信息

Martins Marcio, Vieira Walbert-de Andrade, Paranhos Luiz-Renato, Motta Rogério-Heládio-Lopes, da Silva Carlos-Eduardo-Xavier-Dos Santos-Ribeiro, Rodriguez Carvalho, Ramacciato Juliana-Cama

机构信息

Prevent Senior Institute, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontics division, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas - UNICAMP, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 Aug 1;13(8):e802-e808. doi: 10.4317/jced.57953. eCollection 2021 Aug.

DOI:10.4317/jced.57953
PMID:34512920
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8412807/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the postoperative effects of the piezoelectric device and conventional rotary instruments in Schneider's membrane sinus lifting procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty patients requiring bilateral maxillary bone graft augmentation in the posterior maxillary region were selected. Piezoelectric surgery was performed on one side and conventional surgery with a rotary diamond bur on the other. Postoperative pain, swelling, edema, and mouth opening were evaluated at one hour and two and seven days after the procedures. All variables were submitted to Friedman or Wilcoxon tests at a 5% significance level.

RESULTS

The comparison between groups showed that postoperative pain after one hour and two days was significantly lower (< 0.05) in the piezoelectric device group. Regarding the edema, the results of both techniques were similar at all times assessed (> 0.05). Piezosurgery was statistically associated (< 0.05) with greater mouth opening only at the 48-hour evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteotomy with a piezoelectric device causes less pain and greater mouth opening postoperatively compared with the conventional technique. Piezosurgery, sinus lift, edema, pain, rotative instruments.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估和比较压电装置与传统旋转器械在施奈德膜窦提升术中的术后效果。

材料与方法

选取20例需要对上颌后牙区双侧进行骨增量的患者。一侧采用压电手术,另一侧采用旋转金刚砂车针进行传统手术。在术后1小时、2天和7天评估术后疼痛、肿胀、水肿和张口度。所有变量均在5%显著性水平下进行弗里德曼检验或威尔科克森检验。

结果

组间比较显示,压电装置组术后1小时和2天的疼痛明显较低(<0.05)。关于水肿,在所有评估时间点两种技术的结果相似(>0.05)。仅在48小时评估时,压电手术与更大的张口度存在统计学关联(<0.05)。

结论

与传统技术相比,使用压电装置进行截骨术后疼痛较轻,张口度更大。压电手术、窦提升、水肿、疼痛、旋转器械。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17b9/8412807/65e06d21e88c/jced-13-e802-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17b9/8412807/edafe3df9ec4/jced-13-e802-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17b9/8412807/52fffdb97d99/jced-13-e802-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17b9/8412807/a8d8aca26911/jced-13-e802-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17b9/8412807/65e06d21e88c/jced-13-e802-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17b9/8412807/edafe3df9ec4/jced-13-e802-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17b9/8412807/52fffdb97d99/jced-13-e802-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17b9/8412807/a8d8aca26911/jced-13-e802-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17b9/8412807/65e06d21e88c/jced-13-e802-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotary instruments in schneider's membrane sinus lifting: A pilot randomized trial.压电手术与传统旋转器械在施奈德膜窦提升术中的比较:一项初步随机试验。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 Aug 1;13(8):e802-e808. doi: 10.4317/jced.57953. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
Comparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotative instruments in direct sinus lifting.压电外科手术与传统旋转器械在直接上颌窦提升术中的比较。
Implant Dent. 2013 Dec;22(6):662-5. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000001.
3
Comparative Study of Piezoelectric and Rotary Osteotomy Technique for Third Molar Impaction.第三磨牙阻生的压电与旋转截骨技术对比研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Jan 1;18(1):60-64. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1990.
4
Osteotomy and membrane elevation during the maxillary sinus augmentation procedure. A comparative study: piezoelectric device vs. conventional rotative instruments.上颌窦提升术中的截骨术和黏膜剥离。一项比较研究:压电装置与传统旋转器械。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 May;19(5):511-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01498.x. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
5
Piezotome Versus Surgical Bur: Which is More Effective in Reducing the Postoperative Pain and Edema Following Open Sinus Lift Surgery?超声骨刀与外科钻:在减少开放式上颌窦提升术后疼痛和水肿方面哪种更有效?
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2021 Dec;20(4):642-648. doi: 10.1007/s12663-020-01391-2. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
6
Comparison between conventional and piezoelectric surgical tools for maxillary sinus floor elevation. A randomized controlled clinical trial.传统与压电外科工具用于上颌窦底提升的比较:一项随机对照临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Apr;15(2):297-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00364.x. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
7
A split-mouth study comparing piezo electric surgery and traditional rotary burs on impacted third molars in young patients: an intraoperative and postoperative evaluation.一项针对年轻患者阻生第三磨牙,比较压电手术与传统旋转牙钻的半口对照研究:术中和术后评估。
Minerva Stomatol. 2020 Oct;69(5):278-285. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4970.20.04349-6. Epub 2020 May 14.
8
A prospective split-mouth clinical study: comparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotary instruments in impacted third molar surgery.一项前瞻性半口临床研究:阻生第三磨牙手术中压电手术与传统旋转器械的比较。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Mar;24(1):51-55. doi: 10.1007/s10006-019-00817-7. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
9
Postoperative evaluation of Er:YAG laser, piezosurgery, and rotary systems used for osteotomy in mandibular third-molar extractions.用于下颌第三磨牙拔除的骨切开术中的 Er:YAG 激光、超声骨刀和旋转系统的术后评估。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2021 Jan;49(1):64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2020.11.010. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
10
Comparison of postoperative morbidity between piezoelectric surgery and conventional rotary instruments in mandibular third molar surgery: a split-mouth clinical study.在下颌第三磨牙手术中,比较超声骨刀与传统高速手机手术的术后并发症:一项随机对照临床研究。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021 May 1;26(3):e269-e275. doi: 10.4317/medoral.24085.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of piezoelectric surgery and conventional techniques in the enucleation of cysts and tumors in the jaws: a systematic review and meta-analysis.压电手术与传统技术在下颌囊肿和肿瘤摘除术中的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2025 May 1;30(3):e333-e344. doi: 10.4317/medoral.26799.
2
Incidence, Size and Orientation of Maxillary Sinus Septa-A Retrospective Clinical Study.上颌窦隔的发生率、大小及方向——一项回顾性临床研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 24;11(9):2393. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092393.

本文引用的文献

1
A review of complications of maxillary sinus augmentation and available treatment methods.上颌窦提升术并发症及可用治疗方法综述。
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Aug;45(4):220-224. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.4.220. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
2
Piezosurgery vs conventional rotary instrument in the third molar surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.第三磨牙手术中压电外科手术与传统旋转器械的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Dent Sci. 2018 Dec;13(4):342-349. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2016.09.006. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
3
Long-term effectiveness of maxillary sinus floor augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
上颌窦底提升长期效果的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jun;46 Suppl 21:307-318. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13055.
4
Comparing the Quality of Life of Patients Requesting Dental Implants Before and After Implant.比较种植牙植入前后患者的生活质量。
Open Dent J. 2017 Aug 31;11:485-491. doi: 10.2174/1874210601711010485. eCollection 2017.
5
CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials.《CONSORT 2010声明:随机试点和可行性试验的扩展》
BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5239. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5239.
6
Bone Augmentation of the Edentulous Maxilla for Implant Placement: A Systematic Review.无牙上颌骨种植体植入的骨增量:一项系统评价。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31 Suppl:s19-30. doi: 10.11607/jomi.16suppl.g1.
7
Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis.后牙区短种植体与标准种植体的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Dent. 2016 Apr;47:8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
8
Piezosurgery in implant dentistry.种植牙科中的压电外科手术。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2015 Nov 11;7:115-24. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S63466. eCollection 2015.
9
Comparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotative instruments in direct sinus lifting.压电外科手术与传统旋转器械在直接上颌窦提升术中的比较。
Implant Dent. 2013 Dec;22(6):662-5. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000001.
10
Piezoelectric osteotomy for the placement of titanium implants in rabbits: histomorphometry study.用于在兔体内植入钛种植体的压电截骨术:组织形态计量学研究
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Oct;25(10):1182-8. doi: 10.1111/clr.12229. Epub 2013 Jul 8.