Suppr超能文献

压电手术与传统旋转器械在施奈德膜窦提升术中的比较:一项初步随机试验。

Comparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotary instruments in schneider's membrane sinus lifting: A pilot randomized trial.

作者信息

Martins Marcio, Vieira Walbert-de Andrade, Paranhos Luiz-Renato, Motta Rogério-Heládio-Lopes, da Silva Carlos-Eduardo-Xavier-Dos Santos-Ribeiro, Rodriguez Carvalho, Ramacciato Juliana-Cama

机构信息

Prevent Senior Institute, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontics division, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas - UNICAMP, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 Aug 1;13(8):e802-e808. doi: 10.4317/jced.57953. eCollection 2021 Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the postoperative effects of the piezoelectric device and conventional rotary instruments in Schneider's membrane sinus lifting procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty patients requiring bilateral maxillary bone graft augmentation in the posterior maxillary region were selected. Piezoelectric surgery was performed on one side and conventional surgery with a rotary diamond bur on the other. Postoperative pain, swelling, edema, and mouth opening were evaluated at one hour and two and seven days after the procedures. All variables were submitted to Friedman or Wilcoxon tests at a 5% significance level.

RESULTS

The comparison between groups showed that postoperative pain after one hour and two days was significantly lower (< 0.05) in the piezoelectric device group. Regarding the edema, the results of both techniques were similar at all times assessed (> 0.05). Piezosurgery was statistically associated (< 0.05) with greater mouth opening only at the 48-hour evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteotomy with a piezoelectric device causes less pain and greater mouth opening postoperatively compared with the conventional technique. Piezosurgery, sinus lift, edema, pain, rotative instruments.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估和比较压电装置与传统旋转器械在施奈德膜窦提升术中的术后效果。

材料与方法

选取20例需要对上颌后牙区双侧进行骨增量的患者。一侧采用压电手术,另一侧采用旋转金刚砂车针进行传统手术。在术后1小时、2天和7天评估术后疼痛、肿胀、水肿和张口度。所有变量均在5%显著性水平下进行弗里德曼检验或威尔科克森检验。

结果

组间比较显示,压电装置组术后1小时和2天的疼痛明显较低(<0.05)。关于水肿,在所有评估时间点两种技术的结果相似(>0.05)。仅在48小时评估时,压电手术与更大的张口度存在统计学关联(<0.05)。

结论

与传统技术相比,使用压电装置进行截骨术后疼痛较轻,张口度更大。压电手术、窦提升、水肿、疼痛、旋转器械。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17b9/8412807/edafe3df9ec4/jced-13-e802-g001.jpg

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
A review of complications of maxillary sinus augmentation and available treatment methods.上颌窦提升术并发症及可用治疗方法综述。
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Aug;45(4):220-224. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.4.220. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
8
Piezosurgery in implant dentistry.种植牙科中的压电外科手术。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2015 Nov 11;7:115-24. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S63466. eCollection 2015.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验