Sinha Shubhadeep, Chary Sreenivasa, Thakur Pankaj, Talluri Leela, Reddy Mohan, Verma Kamal K, Saha Pradeep, Gupta Vijaya B, Ramaiah Kaja A, Khanum Siquafa Z
Clinical Development and Medical Affairs, Hetero Labs Limited, Hyderabad, IND.
Psychiatry, Sardar Patel Medical College, Bikaner, IND.
Cureus. 2021 Jul 28;13(7):e16689. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16689. eCollection 2021 Jul.
Background Depression is a leading cause of psychiatric morbidity in the modern world, and the introduction of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) is a revolution in the treatment of depression. Vilazodone, a novel SSRI and 5-HT1A partial agonist, received FDA approval in 2011 to treat the major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults. This study conducted in India aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vilazodone when compared to escitalopram or placebo in patients with MDD. Methods This was a prospective, multicentre, randomized, comparative study of 375 participants over eight weeks of treatment with either vilazodone (10-40mg/day) or escitalopram (10-40 mg/day) or placebo in adult patients with MDD. Primary efficacy was assessed using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17); secondary efficacy was assessed using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) score. Safety parameters included adverse events (AEs), clinical laboratory results, vital signs, electrocardiogram ( ECG), and Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). Results Mean change in the HAM-D-17 total score from baseline to week 8 for vilazodone, escitalopram, and placebo-treated patients in intent-to-treat (ITT) population was: -18.9 (± 7.49), -17.8 (± 6.06), and -7.4 (± 6.32); in ITT population (with Last Observation Carried Forward( LOCF) imputation) was: -17.9 (± 7.71), -17.4 (± 6.19), and -6.4 (± 6.84), and in per-protocol (PP) population was: -19.1 (± 7.20), -17.8 (± 6.08), and -7.7 (± 6.29), respectively. The upper limit of 95% CI (0.56 (ITT); 0.90 (ITT with LOCF Imputation); 0.23 (PP)) of difference in HAM-D-17 between vilazodone 40mg and escitalopram 40mg, which is lower than the defined non-inferiority margin (3.56), proving non-inferiority. The difference between vilazodone 40mg, escitalopram 40mg, and the placebo was statistically significant (p<0.0001). No deaths or serious adverse events were reported in this study. Conclusion Vilazodone demonstrated comparable efficacy to escitalopram and superior efficacy over the placebo in the treatment of MDD.
抑郁症是现代世界精神疾病发病的主要原因,选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)的引入是抑郁症治疗的一次革命。维拉唑酮是一种新型SSRI及5-羟色胺1A受体部分激动剂,于2011年获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准,用于治疗成人重度抑郁症(MDD)。本在印度开展的研究旨在评估维拉唑酮与艾司西酞普兰或安慰剂相比,治疗MDD患者的疗效和安全性。方法:这是一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照研究,375名成年MDD患者接受为期8周的治疗,分别服用维拉唑酮(10 - 40mg/天)、艾司西酞普兰(10 - 40mg/天)或安慰剂。主要疗效通过汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D-17)评估;次要疗效通过蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)评分和汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAM-A)评分评估。安全参数包括不良事件(AE)、临床实验室检查结果、生命体征、心电图(ECG)以及哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表(C-SSRS)。结果:在意向性治疗(ITT)人群中,从基线到第8周,维拉唑酮、艾司西酞普兰和安慰剂治疗患者的HAM-D-17总分平均变化分别为:-18.9(±7.49)、-17.8(±6.06)和-7.4(±6.32);在ITT人群(采用末次观察值结转(LOCF)插补法)中分别为:-17.9(±7.71)、-17.4(±6.19)和-6.4(±6.84),在符合方案(PP)人群中分别为:-19.1(±7.20)、-17.8(±6.08)和-7.7(±6.29)。维拉唑酮40mg与艾司西酞普兰40mg之间HAM-D-17差异的95%CI上限(ITT为0.56;采用LOCF插补法的ITT为0.90;PP为0.23)低于规定的非劣效界值(3.56),证明非劣效。维拉唑酮40mg、艾司西酞普兰40mg与安慰剂之间的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.0001)。本研究未报告死亡或严重不良事件。结论:在治疗MDD方面,维拉唑酮显示出与艾司西酞普兰相当的疗效,且优于安慰剂。