Massaglia Joseph E, Lebowitz Cory, Fitzgerald Keith, Hickok Noreen J, Beredjiklian Pedro, Rivlin Michael
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA.
Cureus. 2021 Jul 29;13(7):e16724. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16724. eCollection 2021 Jul.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate bacterial adherence to common casting materials including plaster of Paris (plaster), fiberglass, three-dimensional (3D) printed plastic, and silicone-coated 3D printed plastic.
The minimal inhibitory concentration of a phosphate-free detergent (Palmolive) needed to achieve total bacterial kill off was determined. 3D printed polylactic acid plastic samples were coated with silicone. Plaster, fiberglass, plastic, and silicone-coated plastic samples were inoculated with . After bacterial inoculation, scanning electron microscopy of the samples was performed to visualize bacterial adherence to the materials' surface. Using either sterile water or a 5% detergent solution, the materials were subjected to washings. Each material was run in 30 replicates: 6 without washing, 6 with sterile water for 1 minute, 6 with detergent for 1 minute, 6 with sterile water for 3 minutes, and 6 with detergent for 3 minutes. The replicates that did not undergo a washing trial represented the initial bacterial inoculation. Samples were then rinsed and sonicated in polysorbate to isolate the remaining adherent bacteria on the materials' surface. The sonicated solutions were plated, incubated, and counted for quantification of colony forming units (CFU) of bacteria. This protocol was repeated for a total of four trials.
During inoculation, there were significantly less bacteria that adhered to silicone-coated 3D printed plastic (58879 CFU) compared to plastic (217479 CFU), plaster (140063 CFU), and fiberglass (550546 CFU). Silicone coating showed further superiority. Silicone-coated 3D printed plastic was able to be decontaminated as demonstrated by significantly fewer remaining bacteria (9.3%) on its surface after being washed with a 5% detergent solution (1797 CFU) compared to sterile water (19321 CFU). The mean remaining bacteria on silicone-coated 3D printed plastic was significantly less than that remaining on all other materials when washed with either sterile water or a detergent solution for both durations of 1 minute and 3 minutes.
The current study demonstrates that significantly less bacteria adhere to the surface of 3D printed plastic with silicone coating showing added protection and that this material can be decontaminated to a greater degree with washing than conventional casting materials. These results provide evidence that 3D printed casts can be washed and successfully decontaminated during a patient's period of immobilization, which is advantageous especially during an infectious crisis such as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
本研究的目的是评估细菌对常见铸造材料的粘附情况,这些材料包括巴黎石膏(石膏)、玻璃纤维、三维(3D)打印塑料和硅胶涂层3D打印塑料。
确定实现完全杀灭细菌所需的无磷酸盐洗涤剂(棕榄)的最低抑菌浓度。3D打印的聚乳酸塑料样品用硅胶涂层。将石膏、玻璃纤维、塑料和硅胶涂层塑料样品接种……。细菌接种后,对样品进行扫描电子显微镜检查,以观察细菌在材料表面的粘附情况。使用无菌水或5%洗涤剂溶液对材料进行冲洗。每种材料进行30次重复实验:6次不冲洗,6次用无菌水冲洗1分钟,6次用洗涤剂冲洗1分钟,6次用无菌水冲洗3分钟,6次用洗涤剂冲洗3分钟。未进行冲洗试验的重复实验代表初始细菌接种。然后将样品冲洗并在聚山梨酯中超声处理,以分离材料表面剩余的粘附细菌。将超声处理后的溶液接种平板、培养并计数,以定量细菌的菌落形成单位(CFU)。该方案总共重复进行四次试验。
在接种过程中,与塑料(217479 CFU)、石膏(140063 CFU)和玻璃纤维(550546 CFU)相比,粘附在硅胶涂层3D打印塑料上的细菌(58879 CFU)明显更少。硅胶涂层显示出进一步的优势。与用无菌水冲洗后(19321 CFU)相比,用5%洗涤剂溶液冲洗后,硅胶涂层3D打印塑料表面剩余的细菌(9.3%,1797 CFU)明显更少,这表明其能够被去污。当用无菌水或洗涤剂溶液冲洗1分钟和3分钟时,硅胶涂层3D打印塑料上剩余的平均细菌数量明显少于所有其他材料上剩余的细菌数量。
当前研究表明,粘附在硅胶涂层3D打印塑料表面的细菌明显更少,硅胶涂层提供了额外的保护,并且与传统铸造材料相比,这种材料在冲洗后能够被更大程度地去污。这些结果提供了证据,表明3D打印石膏在患者固定期间可以进行冲洗并成功去污,这在诸如2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行等感染危机期间尤其有利。