• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知神经科学中的质性与量化个体差异

Qualitative Versus Quantitative Individual Differences in Cognitive Neuroscience.

作者信息

Slagter Heleen A, Bouwer Fleur L

机构信息

Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, NL.

Institute for Brain and Behavior, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, NL.

出版信息

J Cogn. 2021 Aug 27;4(1):49. doi: 10.5334/joc.170. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.5334/joc.170
PMID:34514320
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8396117/
Abstract

Individual differences in cognitive performance can be quantitative or qualitative in nature. Accounting for qualitative as well as quantitative individual differences is of importance for cognitive neuroscience, where a central goal is not only to relate brain function to behavior generally, but also to understand and predict individual behavior from neural data. In turn, cognitive neuroscience can help determine the nature of individual differences by revealing the underlying neural mechanisms and uncover qualitative individual differences that are not immediately apparent from behavioral data, enhancing our understanding of why and how people behave the way they do.

摘要

认知表现的个体差异在本质上可以是定量的或定性的。考虑定性和定量的个体差异对于认知神经科学很重要,在认知神经科学中,一个核心目标不仅是将大脑功能与一般行为联系起来,而且是从神经数据中理解和预测个体行为。反过来,认知神经科学可以通过揭示潜在的神经机制来帮助确定个体差异的本质,并发现行为数据中不立即明显的定性个体差异,从而增强我们对人们为何以及如何以他们的方式行事的理解。

相似文献

1
Qualitative Versus Quantitative Individual Differences in Cognitive Neuroscience.认知神经科学中的质性与量化个体差异
J Cogn. 2021 Aug 27;4(1):49. doi: 10.5334/joc.170. eCollection 2021.
2
Are individual differences quantitative or qualitative? An integrated behavioral and fMRI MIMIC approach.个体差异是定量的还是定性的?一种综合行为和 fMRI 模拟的方法。
Neuroimage. 2019 Nov 15;202:116058. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116058. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
3
Why bother with the brain? A role for decision neuroscience in understanding strategic variability.为什么要关注大脑?决策神经科学在理解策略变异性方面的作用。
Prog Brain Res. 2013;202:267-88. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-62604-2.00015-0.
4
Using Decision Models to Enhance Investigations of Individual Differences in Cognitive Neuroscience.运用决策模型加强对认知神经科学中个体差异的研究。
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 9;7:81. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00081. eCollection 2016.
5
Likelihood approximation networks (LANs) for fast inference of simulation models in cognitive neuroscience.用于认知神经科学中模拟模型快速推断的似然逼近网络 (LANs)。
Elife. 2021 Apr 6;10:e65074. doi: 10.7554/eLife.65074.
6
Toward a model-based cognitive neuroscience of mind wandering.迈向基于模型的思维游荡认知神经科学。
Neuroscience. 2015 Dec 3;310:290-305. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.09.053. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
7
Model-based cognitive neuroscience.基于模型的认知神经科学。
J Math Psychol. 2017 Feb;76(Pt B):59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
8
Changes in Cognitive Function in Human Aging人类衰老过程中认知功能的变化
9
Neural attentional filters and behavioural outcome follow independent individual trajectories over the adult lifespan.在成年期,神经注意力过滤器和行为结果遵循独立的个体轨迹。
Elife. 2024 Mar 12;12:RP92079. doi: 10.7554/eLife.92079.
10
Decreasing Alertness Modulates Perceptual Decision-Making.警觉性降低调节知觉决策。
J Neurosci. 2022 Jan 19;42(3):454-473. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0182-21.2021. Epub 2021 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Importance of additional behavioral observation in psychopharmacology: a case study on agomelatine's effects on feedback sensitivity in probabilistic reversal learning in rats.精神药理学中额外行为观察的重要性:一项关于阿戈美拉汀对大鼠概率反转学习中反馈敏感性影响的案例研究。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2023 Aug 12. doi: 10.1007/s00213-023-06443-2.
2
Impact of swiping direction on the interaction performance of elderly-oriented smart home interface: EEG and eye-tracking evidence.滑动方向对面向老年人的智能家居界面交互性能的影响:脑电图和眼动追踪证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 9;14:1089769. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1089769. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Are There Reliable Qualitative Individual Difference in Cognition?认知中是否存在可靠的个体质性差异?
J Cogn. 2021 Aug 27;4(1):46. doi: 10.5334/joc.131. eCollection 2021.
2
Methodological reporting behavior, sample sizes, and statistical power in studies of event-related potentials: Barriers to reproducibility and replicability.事件相关电位研究中的方法学报告行为、样本量和统计功效:可重复性和可复制性的障碍。
Psychophysiology. 2019 Nov;56(11):e13437. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13437. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
3
Small sample sizes reduce the replicability of task-based fMRI studies.小样本量降低了基于任务的功能磁共振成像研究的可重复性。
Commun Biol. 2018 Jun 7;1:62. doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0073-z. eCollection 2018.
4
The relation between statistical power and inference in fMRI.功能磁共振成像中统计功效与推理之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 20;12(11):e0184923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184923. eCollection 2017.
5
The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences.可靠性悖论:为何稳健的认知任务不能产生可靠的个体差异。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Jun;50(3):1166-1186. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1.
6
Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research.审视前沿:迈向透明且可重复的神经影像学研究。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Feb;18(2):115-126. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.167. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
7
Why more is better: Simultaneous modeling of EEG, fMRI, and behavioral data.为何越多越好:脑电图(EEG)、功能磁共振成像(fMRI)及行为数据的同步建模
Neuroimage. 2016 Mar;128:96-115. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.030. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
8
Dissociable mechanisms underlying individual differences in visual working memory capacity.视觉工作记忆容量个体差异背后的可分离机制。
Neuroimage. 2014 Oct 1;99:197-206. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.060. Epub 2014 May 27.
9
Dopamine asymmetries predict orienting bias in healthy individuals.多巴胺不对称性预测健康个体的定向偏向。
Cereb Cortex. 2013 Dec;23(12):2899-904. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs277. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
10
A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention.用于视空间注意的偏侧化大脑网络。
Nat Neurosci. 2011 Sep 18;14(10):1245-6. doi: 10.1038/nn.2905.