Eastman Dental Hospital, University College London Hospitals Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Department of Orthodontics, University College London, London, UK.
Prog Orthod. 2021 Sep 13;22(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40510-021-00373-5.
Apps have been shown to be an effective tool in changing patients' behaviours in orthodontics and can be used to improve their compliance with treatment. The Behaviour Change Techniques (BCTs) and quality (using MARS) within these apps have previously not been published.
The UK Google Play and Apple App Stores were searched to identify all orthodontic apps and 305 apps were identified. All 305 apps were assessed for the presence of BCTs using an accepted taxonomy of BCTs (Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW)), widely utilised in healthcare. Of those containing BCTs, the quality was assessed using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS), a validated and multi-dimensional tool which rates apps according to 19 objective criteria. Data collection was carried out by two calibrated, independent assessors and repeated after 6 weeks for 25% of the apps by both assessors.
BCTs were found in 31 apps, although only 18 of them were analysed for quality and 13 apps were excluded. Six different BCTs were identified: these were most commonly 'prompts/cues', and 'information about health consequences'. All apps were shown to be of moderate quality (range 3.1-3.7/5). Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for BCT and quality assessment were excellent.
The current availability of orthodontic apps of sufficient quality to recommend to patients is very limited. There is therefore a need for high-quality orthodontic apps with appropriate BCTs to be created, which may be utilised to improve patients' compliance with treatment.
应用程序已被证明是改变正畸患者行为的有效工具,可用于提高他们对治疗的依从性。这些应用程序中的行为改变技术(BCT)和质量(使用 MARS)以前没有发表过。
在英国的 Google Play 和 Apple App Store 上搜索以确定所有正畸应用程序,并确定了 305 个应用程序。使用广泛用于医疗保健的 BCT 公认分类法(行为改变轮(BCW))评估所有 305 个应用程序中 BCT 的存在。在包含 BCT 的应用程序中,使用经过验证的多维工具移动应用程序评级量表(MARS)评估质量,该工具根据 19 个客观标准对应用程序进行评分。数据由两名经过校准的独立评估员收集,并在 6 周后由两名评估员对 25%的应用程序重复进行。
在 31 个应用程序中发现了 BCT,但仅对其中 18 个进行了质量分析,排除了 13 个应用程序。确定了六种不同的 BCT:这些最常见的是“提示/线索”和“关于健康后果的信息”。所有应用程序的质量均被评为中等(范围为 3.1-3.7/5)。BCT 和质量评估的组内和组间可靠性均很好。
目前可推荐给患者的高质量正畸应用程序非常有限。因此,需要创建具有适当 BCT 的高质量正畸应用程序,这可能有助于提高患者对治疗的依从性。