Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Center for Phage Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
mBio. 2021 Oct 26;12(5):e0101321. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01013-21. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
Phage P1 is a temperate phage which makes the lytic or lysogenic decision upon infecting bacteria. During the lytic cycle, progeny phages are produced and the cell lyses, and in the lysogenic cycle, P1 DNA exists as a low-copy-number plasmid and replicates autonomously. Previous studies at the bulk level showed that P1 lysogenization was independent of ultiplicity f nfection (MOI; the number of phages infecting a cell), whereas lysogenization probability of the paradigmatic phage λ increases with MOI. However, the mechanism underlying the P1 behavior is unclear. In this work, using a fluorescent reporter system, we demonstrated this P1 MOI-independent lysogenic response at the single-cell level. We further observed that the activity of the major repressor of lytic functions (C1) is a determining factor for the final cell fate. Specifically, the repression activity of P1, which arises from a combination of C1, the anti-repressor Coi, and the corepressor Lxc, remains constant for different MOI, which results in the MOI-independent lysogenic response. Additionally, by increasing the distance between phages that infect a single cell, we were able to engineer a λ-like, MOI-dependent lysogenization upon P1 infection. This suggests that the large separation of coinfecting phages attenuates the effective communication between them, allowing them to make decisions independently of each other. Our work establishes a highly quantitative framework to describe P1 lysogeny establishment. This system plays an important role in disseminating antibiotic resistance by P1-like plasmids and provides an alternative to the lifestyle of phage λ. Phage P1 has been shown potentially to play an important role in disseminating antibiotic resistance among bacteria during lysogenization, as evidenced by the prevalence of P1 phage-like elements in animal and human pathogens. In contrast to phage λ, a cell fate decision-making paradigm, P1 lysogenization was shown to be independent of MOI. In this work, we built a simple genetic model to elucidate this MOI independency based on the gene-regulatory circuitry of P1. We also proposed that the effective communication between coinfecting phages contributes to the lysis-lysogeny decision-making of P1 and highlighted the significance of spatial organization in the process of cell fate determination in a single-cell environment. Finally, our work provides new insights into different strategies acquired by viruses to interact with their bacterial hosts in different scenarios for their optimal survival.
噬菌 P1 是一种温和噬菌体,它在感染细菌时会做出裂解或溶原的决定。在裂解周期中,会产生子代噬菌体,细胞裂解,而在溶原周期中,P1 DNA 作为低拷贝数质粒存在并自主复制。以前的整体水平研究表明,P1 溶原化与感染复数 (MOI;感染细胞的噬菌体数量) 无关,而典范噬菌体 λ 的溶原化概率随 MOI 增加而增加。然而,P1 行为的机制尚不清楚。在这项工作中,我们使用荧光报告系统在单细胞水平上证明了这种 P1 MOI 独立的溶原反应。我们进一步观察到,裂解功能主要抑制剂(C1)的活性是决定细胞最终命运的决定因素。具体来说,来自 C1、反抑制剂 Coi 和核心抑制剂 Lxc 的组合的 P1 抑制活性在不同 MOI 下保持不变,这导致了 MOI 独立的溶原反应。此外,通过增加感染单个细胞的噬菌体之间的距离,我们能够在 P1 感染时设计出类似于 λ 的、依赖 MOI 的溶原化。这表明,共感染噬菌体的大分离减弱了它们之间的有效通信,使它们能够相互独立地做出决定。我们的工作建立了一个高度定量的框架来描述 P1 溶原建立。该系统在通过 P1 样质粒传播抗生素抗性方面发挥着重要作用,并为噬菌体 λ 的生活方式提供了替代方案。噬菌 P1 在溶原化过程中通过 P1 噬菌体样元件在动物和人类病原体中的普遍存在,已被证明可能在传播细菌中的抗生素抗性方面发挥重要作用。与噬菌体 λ 这一细胞命运决策范式相反,P1 溶原化被证明与 MOI 无关。在这项工作中,我们构建了一个简单的遗传模型,基于 P1 的基因调控电路来阐明这种 MOI 独立性。我们还提出,共感染噬菌体之间的有效通信有助于 P1 的裂解-溶原决策,并强调了在单细胞环境中细胞命运决定过程中的空间组织的重要性。最后,我们的工作为不同病毒在不同情况下与细菌宿主相互作用以实现最佳生存的不同策略提供了新的见解。