Chun Dong-Il, Min Tae-Hong, Cho Jae-Ho, Won Sung-Hun, Shon Jeong-In, Yi Young
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.
J Bone Metab. 2021 Aug;28(3):231-237. doi: 10.11005/jbm.2021.28.3.231. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
This study aimed to analyze the correlation between bone mineral density (BMD) and the type of 5th metatarsal fracture, as well as to demonstrate whether there is a difference in radiological findings (heel alignment angle [HAA], heel moment arm [HMA], and metatarsus angle) between fracture types.
A total of 87 patients were enrolled in the study and allocated into 3 groups: the Zone 1 group (N=36), the Zone 2 group (N=33), and the Zone 3 group (N=18). The participants' demographic data, T-scores, existing fracture or osteoporosis medications, and radiologic parameters including HAA, HMA, and metatarsus adductus angle were analyzed and compared.
There was a significant difference between the mean age of the participants, with the highest age in the Zone 1 group and the lowest in the Zone 3 group. Regarding the history of concurrent fracture or osteoporosis medications, there was no significant difference between the 3 groups. Similarly, no significant difference was observed between the 3 groups about the BMD values. In contrast, the HAA was statistically significant in all groups with a positive correlation of -8.9 in the Zone 1 group, a negative correlation of 3.55 in the Zone 2 group, and an inverse relationship of 6.1 in the Zone 3 group. The metatarsus adductus angle was significantly higher in the Zone 3 group than the Zone 1 and Zone 2 groups.
The location of a 5th metatarsal bone fracture is not significantly associated with BMD. However, mechanical influences, such as hindfoot varus or forefoot adductus, have a significant correlation with fracture types.
本研究旨在分析骨密度(BMD)与第五跖骨骨折类型之间的相关性,并证明不同骨折类型在影像学表现(足跟对线角[HAA]、足跟力臂[HMA]和跖骨角)上是否存在差异。
共有87例患者纳入本研究,并分为3组:1区组(N = 36)、2区组(N = 33)和3区组(N = 18)。分析并比较了参与者的人口统计学数据、T值、现有的骨折或骨质疏松症用药情况以及包括HAA、HMA和跖骨内收角在内的放射学参数。
参与者的平均年龄存在显著差异,1区组年龄最高,3区组年龄最低。关于同时存在骨折或骨质疏松症用药史,3组之间无显著差异。同样,3组之间的骨密度值也未观察到显著差异。相比之下,HAA在所有组中均具有统计学意义,1区组的正相关系数为-8.9,2区组的负相关系数为3.55,3区组的负相关系数为6.1。3区组的跖骨内收角显著高于1区组和2区组。
第五跖骨骨折的位置与骨密度无显著相关性。然而,诸如后足内翻或前足内收等力学影响与骨折类型具有显著相关性。