Chan Brian, Bougatsos Christina, Priest Kelsey C, McCarty Dennis, Grusing Sara, Chou Roger
Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Pacific Northwest Evidence-Based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, BICC, Portland, OR, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Subst Abus. 2022;43(1):539-546. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2021.1967836. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
Methadone and buprenorphine are effective medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) that are highly regulated in the United States. The on-going opioid crisis, and more recently COVID-19, has prompted reconsideration of these restrictions in order to sustain and improve treatment access, with renewed interest in telemedicine. We reviewed the evidence on use of telemedicine interventions and applicability to MOUD policy changes in the post-COVID-19 treatment landscape. Ovid MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases were searched from inception to April 2021 and reference lists were reviewed to identify additional studies. Studies were eligible if they examined telemedicine interventions and reported outcomes (e.g. treatment initiation, retention in care). Randomized trials and controlled observational studies were prioritized; other studies were included when stronger evidence was unavailable. One investigator abstracted key information and a second investigator verified data. We described the results qualitatively. We identified nine studies: three controlled trials (two randomized), and six observational studies. Three studies evaluated patients treated with methadone and six studies with buprenorphine, including one study of pregnant women with OUD. All studies showed telemedicine approaches associated with similar outcomes (treatment retention, positive urine toxicology) compared to treatment as usual. Trials were limited by small samples sizes, lack of reporting harms, and most were conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic; observational studies were limited by failure to control for confounding. Limited evidence suggests that telemedicine may enhance access to MOUD with similar effectiveness compared with face-to-face treatment. Few studies have been published since COVID-19, and it is unclear the potential impact of these interventions on the existing racial/ethnic disparities in treatment. The COVID-19 pandemic and need for social distancing led to temporary policy changes for prescribing of MOUD that could inform additional research in this area to support comprehensive policy reforms.
美沙酮和丁丙诺啡是用于治疗阿片类物质使用障碍(MOUD)的有效药物,在美国受到严格监管。持续的阿片类药物危机,以及最近的新冠疫情,促使人们重新考虑这些限制措施,以维持和改善治疗的可及性,并重新燃起了对远程医疗的兴趣。我们回顾了关于远程医疗干预措施的证据,以及其在新冠疫情后治疗环境中对MOUD政策变化的适用性。从数据库建立到2021年4月,我们检索了Ovid MEDLINE和Cochrane系统评价数据库,并查阅了参考文献列表以识别其他研究。如果研究考察了远程医疗干预措施并报告了结果(如治疗开始、持续接受治疗情况),则这些研究符合纳入标准。优先纳入随机试验和对照观察性研究;当缺乏更强有力的证据时,也纳入其他研究。一名研究人员提取关键信息,另一名研究人员核实数据。我们对结果进行了定性描述。我们共识别出9项研究:3项对照试验(2项随机试验)和6项观察性研究。3项研究评估了接受美沙酮治疗的患者,6项研究评估了接受丁丙诺啡治疗的患者,其中包括一项对患有阿片类物质使用障碍的孕妇的研究。所有研究均表明,与常规治疗相比,远程医疗方法的治疗效果(持续接受治疗、尿毒理学检测呈阳性)相似。试验受到样本量小、未报告不良事件的限制,且大多数研究是在新冠疫情大流行之前进行的;观察性研究则受到未能控制混杂因素的限制。有限的证据表明,与面对面治疗相比,远程医疗可能会提高MOUD的可及性,且效果相似。自新冠疫情以来,发表的研究很少,目前尚不清楚这些干预措施对现有治疗中种族/民族差异的潜在影响。新冠疫情大流行以及社交距离的需要导致了MOUD处方的临时政策变化,这可为该领域的更多研究提供参考,以支持全面的政策改革。