• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院收治严重交通事故受伤者的数据与政府官方统计数据的比较。

A comparison of hospital admissions data and official government statistics of serious traffic accident injuries.

作者信息

Morrison P, Kjellstrom T

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Queens University, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 1987 Aug 26;100(830):517-20.

PMID:3452080
Abstract

Two sources of New Zealand statistics on serious traffic accident injuries were compared for the period 1973-82. The official statistics based on Ministry of Transport reports showed consistently lower figures than the supposedly comparable hospital admission statistics from the Department of Health. The reporting ratio in the official statistics had decreased from 66% of the first admissions to hospital in 1973 to 43% in 1982. The highest reporting ratios were observed for drivers and passengers (66% in 1982). For pedestrians it was 48%, for motor cyclists 45% and for bicyclists 15%. A detailed analysis of reporting ratios for specific types of accidents among children showed that for certain accidents almost none of the injured children were recorded in the Ministry of Transport statistics. It is concluded that these statistics present a distorted picture of the nonfatal road toll and that a new statistical reporting system combining information from several sources is needed.

摘要

对1973年至1982年期间新西兰严重交通事故受伤情况的两个统计来源进行了比较。基于交通部报告的官方统计数据显示,其数字一直低于卫生部提供的本应具有可比性的医院入院统计数据。官方统计中的报告率已从1973年首次入院人数的66%降至1982年的43%。司机和乘客的报告率最高(1982年为66%)。行人的报告率为48%,摩托车手为45%,骑自行车者为15%。对儿童特定类型事故报告率的详细分析表明,对于某些事故,交通部的统计数据几乎没有记录受伤儿童的情况。得出的结论是,这些统计数据歪曲了非致命道路伤亡情况,需要一个结合多个来源信息的新统计报告系统。

相似文献

1
A comparison of hospital admissions data and official government statistics of serious traffic accident injuries.医院收治严重交通事故受伤者的数据与政府官方统计数据的比较。
N Z Med J. 1987 Aug 26;100(830):517-20.
2
Seasonal variation in hospital admission for road traffic injuries in England: analysis of hospital statistics.英格兰道路交通伤害住院季节性变化:医院统计分析。
Inj Prev. 2009 Dec;15(6):374-8. doi: 10.1136/ip.2009.021675.
3
Estimation of non-fatal road traffic injuries in Thai Nguyen, Vietnam using capture-recapture method.使用捕获再捕获法对越南谅山非致命道路交通伤害进行估计。
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2006 Mar;37(2):405-11.
4
[Epidemiological research and analysis on the impaired person in road traffic accident in Chengdu area].[成都地区道路交通事故伤残人员的流行病学研究与分析]
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2007 Aug;23(4):269-73.
5
Fatal traffic injuries among pedestrians, bicyclists and motor vehicle occupants.行人、骑自行车者和机动车驾乘人员中的致命交通伤害。
Forensic Sci Int. 2005 Jul 16;151(2-3):151-6. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.01.014.
6
[Bicycle injuries. Hospital based registration of injuries during 1985-89].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1990 Jun 30;110(17):2218-21.
7
[Traffic-related injuries in children at Trieste, 1984-1986].[1984 - 1986年的里雅斯特儿童交通相关伤害情况]
Minerva Pediatr. 1990 Nov;42(11):465-72.
8
Road traffic accident injuries in Kampala.坎帕拉的道路交通事故伤害情况。
East Afr Med J. 1999 Apr;76(4):189-94.
9
Changes in safety on England's roads: analysis of hospital statistics.英格兰道路安全的变化:医院统计数据分析
BMJ. 2006 Jul 8;333(7558):73. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38883.593831.4F. Epub 2006 Jun 23.
10
Incidence and severity of head and neck injuries in victims of road traffic crashes: In an economically developed country.道路交通碰撞受害者头颈部损伤的发生率和严重程度:在一个经济发达国家。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2009 Jan;17(1):52-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2008.07.007. Epub 2008 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of graduated driver licensing restrictions on crashes involving young drivers in New Zealand.分级驾驶执照限制对新西兰涉及年轻驾驶员的撞车事故的影响。
Inj Prev. 2001 Dec;7(4):292-6. doi: 10.1136/ip.7.4.292.
2
Capture-recapture: a useful methodological tool for counting traffic related injuries?捕获再捕获法:一种用于统计交通相关伤害的有用方法工具?
Inj Prev. 2000 Dec;6(4):299-304. doi: 10.1136/ip.6.4.299.
3
Are child pedestrians at increased risk of injury on one-way compared to two-way streets?与双向街道相比,单向街道上儿童行人受伤的风险会增加吗?
Can J Public Health. 2000 May-Jun;91(3):201-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03404272.