Tokyo Laboratory and Division of International Collaboration Research, Joint Research Center for Human Retrovirus Infection, Kumamoto Universitygrid.274841.c, Kumamoto, Japan.
Center for AIDS Research, Kumamoto Universitygrid.274841.c, Kumamoto, Japan.
J Virol. 2021 Nov 9;95(23):e0125921. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01259-21. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
Although mutant-specific T cells are elicited in some individuals infected with HIV-1 mutant viruses, the detailed characteristics of these T cells remain unknown. A recent study showed that the accumulation of strains expressing Nef135F, which were selected by HLA-A24:02-restricted T cells, was associated with poor outcomes in individuals with the detrimental HLA-B35:01 allele and that HLA-B35:01-restricted NefYF9 (Nef135-143)-specific T cells failed to recognize target cells infected with Nef135F mutant viruses. Here, we investigated HLA-B35:01-restricted T cells specific for the NefFF9 epitope incorporating the Nef135F mutation. Longitudinal T-cell receptor (TCR) clonotype analysis demonstrated that 3 types of HLA-B35:01-restricted T cells (wild-type [WT] specific, mutant specific, and cross-reactive) with different T cell repertoires were elicited during the clinical course. HLA-B35:01 individuals possessing wild-type-specific T cells had a significantly lower plasma viral load (pVL) than those with mutant-specific and/or cross-reactive T cells, even though the latter T cells effectively recognized the mutant virus-infected cells. These results suggest that mutant-specific and cross-reactive T cells could only partially suppress HIV-1 replication . An e analysis of the T cells showed higher expression of PD-1 on cross-reactive T cells and lower expression of CD160/2B4 on the mutant-specific T cells than other T cells, implying that these inhibitory and stimulatory molecules are key to the reduced function of these T cells. In the present study, we demonstrate that mutant-specific and cross-reactive T cells do not contribute to the suppression of HIV-1 replication in HIV-1-infected individuals, even though they have the capacity to recognize mutant virus-infected cells. Thus, the collaboration of HLA-A24:02 with the detrimental allele HLA-B35:01 resulted in the coevolution of HIV-1 alongside virus-specific T cells, leading to poorer clinical outcomes. HIV-1 escape mutations are selected under pressure from HIV-1-specific CD8 T cells. Accumulation of these mutations in circulating viruses impairs the control of HIV-1 by HIV-1-specific T cells. Although it is known that HIV-1-specific T cells recognizing mutant virus were elicited in some individuals infected with a mutant virus, the role of these T cells remains unclear. Accumulation of phenylalanine at HIV-1 Nef135 (Nef135F), which is selected by HLA-A24:02-restricted T cells, led to poor clinical outcome in individuals carrying the detrimental HLA-B35:01 allele. In the present study, we found that HLA-B35:01-restricted mutant-specific and cross-reactive T cells were elicited in HLA-B35:01 individuals infected with the Nef135F mutant virus. These T cells could not effectively suppress HIV-1 replication even though they could recognize mutant virus-infected cells . Mutant-specific and cross-reactive T cells expressed lower levels of stimulatory molecules and higher levels of inhibitory molecules, respectively, suggesting a potential mechanism whereby these T cells fail to suppress HIV-1 replication in HIV-1-infected individuals.
尽管在一些感染 HIV-1 突变病毒的个体中会引发针对突变体的特异性 T 细胞,但这些 T 细胞的详细特征仍不清楚。最近的一项研究表明,在具有有害 HLA-B35:01 等位基因的个体中,选择 HLA-A24:02 限制性 T 细胞的 Nef135F 表达株的积累与不良结局相关,并且 HLA-B35:01 限制性 NefYF9(Nef135-143)特异性 T 细胞无法识别感染 Nef135F 突变病毒的靶细胞。在这里,我们研究了针对包含 Nef135F 突变的 NefFF9 表位的 HLA-B35:01 限制性 T 细胞。纵向 T 细胞受体 (TCR) 克隆型分析表明,在临床过程中,3 种具有不同 T 细胞库的 HLA-B35:01 限制性 T 细胞(野生型 [WT] 特异性、突变体特异性和交叉反应性)被引发。具有野生型特异性 T 细胞的 HLA-B35:01 个体的血浆病毒载量 (pVL) 明显低于具有突变体特异性和/或交叉反应性 T 细胞的个体,尽管后者 T 细胞可以有效识别突变病毒感染的细胞。这些结果表明,突变体特异性和交叉反应性 T 细胞只能部分抑制 HIV-1 复制。对 T 细胞的分析表明,交叉反应性 T 细胞上 PD-1 的表达更高,而突变体特异性 T 细胞上 CD160/2B4 的表达更低,这表明这些抑制性和刺激性分子是这些 T 细胞功能降低的关键。在本研究中,我们证明了突变体特异性和交叉反应性 T 细胞不能有助于抑制 HIV-1 复制,即使它们有能力识别突变病毒感染的细胞。因此,HLA-A24:02 与有害等位基因 HLA-B35:01 的协同作用导致了 HIV-1 与病毒特异性 T 细胞的共同进化,从而导致了更差的临床结局。HIV-1 逃逸突变是在 HIV-1 特异性 CD8 T 细胞的压力下选择的。这些突变在循环病毒中的积累损害了 HIV-1 特异性 T 细胞对 HIV-1 的控制。尽管已知一些感染突变病毒的个体中会引发识别突变病毒的 HIV-1 特异性 T 细胞,但这些 T 细胞的作用仍不清楚。HIV-1 Nef135 中的苯丙氨酸(Nef135F)的积累是由 HLA-A24:02 限制性 T 细胞选择的,这导致携带有害 HLA-B35:01 等位基因的个体的临床结局较差。在本研究中,我们发现 HLA-B35:01 个体感染 Nef135F 突变病毒后会引发 HLA-B35:01 限制性突变体特异性和交叉反应性 T 细胞。尽管这些 T 细胞能够识别突变病毒感染的细胞,但它们不能有效地抑制 HIV-1 复制。突变体特异性和交叉反应性 T 细胞分别表达较低水平的刺激分子和较高水平的抑制分子,这表明这些 T 细胞不能抑制 HIV-1 复制的潜在机制。