Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Rheumatology, & Immunology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam Institute of Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdamgrid.7177.6, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0073121. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00731-21. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
COVID-19 patients produce circulating and mucosal antibodies. In adults, specific saliva antibodies have been detected. Nonetheless, seroprevalence is routinely investigated, while little attention has been paid to mucosal antibodies. We therefore assessed SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody prevalence in serum and saliva in children in the Netherlands. We assessed SARS-CoV-2 antibody prevalence in serum and saliva of 517 children attending medical services in the Netherlands (irrespective of COVID-19 exposure) from April to October 2020. The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 spike (S), receptor binding domain (RBD), and nucleocapsid (N)-specific IgG and IgA were evaluated with an exploratory Luminex assay in serum and saliva and with the Wantai SARS-CoV-2 RBD total antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in serum. Using the Wantai assay, the RBD-specific antibody prevalence in serum was 3.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]. 1.9 to 5.3%). With the Luminex assay, we detected heterogeneity between antibodies for S, RBD, and N antigens, as IgG and IgA prevalence ranged between 3.6 and 4.6% in serum and between 0 and 4.4% in saliva. The Luminex assay also revealed differences between serum and saliva, with SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG present in saliva but not in serum for 1.5 to 2.7% of all children. Using multiple antigen assays, the IgG prevalence for at least two out of three antigens (S, RBD, or N) in serum or saliva can be calculated as 3.8% (95% CI, 2.3 to 5.6%). Our study displays the heterogeneity of the SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in children and emphasizes the additional value of saliva antibody detection and the combined use of different antigens. Comprehending humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2, including in children, is crucial for future public health and vaccine strategies. Others have suggested that mucosal antibody measurement could be an important and more convenient tool to evaluate humoral immunity compared to circulating antibodies. Nonetheless, seroprevalence is routinely investigated, while little attention has been paid to mucosal antibodies. We show the heterogeneity of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, in terms of both antigen specificity and differences between circulating and mucosal antibodies, emphasizing the additional value of saliva antibody detection next to detection of antibodies in serum.
COVID-19 患者会产生循环和黏膜抗体。在成年人中,已经检测到了特定的唾液抗体。然而,通常会检测血清抗体的流行率,而对黏膜抗体的关注较少。因此,我们评估了荷兰儿童的血清和唾液中 SARS-CoV-2 特异性抗体的流行率。我们评估了 2020 年 4 月至 10 月期间在荷兰接受医疗服务的 517 名儿童(无论 COVID-19 暴露情况如何)的血清和唾液中 SARS-CoV-2 刺突 (S)、受体结合域 (RBD) 和核衣壳 (N)-特异性 IgG 和 IgA 的流行率。使用探索性 Luminex 测定法在血清和唾液中评估了 SARS-CoV-2 刺突 (S)、受体结合域 (RBD) 和核衣壳 (N) 特异性 IgG 和 IgA 的流行率,并使用万泰 SARS-CoV-2 RBD 总抗体酶联免疫吸附测定法在血清中进行了评估。使用万泰检测法,血清中 RBD 特异性抗体的流行率为 3.3%(95%置信区间[CI]:1.9 至 5.3%)。使用 Luminex 测定法,我们检测到 S、RBD 和 N 抗原的抗体之间存在异质性,因为 IgG 和 IgA 的流行率在血清中为 3.6%至 4.6%,在唾液中为 0 至 4.4%。Luminex 测定法还揭示了血清和唾液之间的差异,对于所有儿童中的 1.5%至 2.7%,SARS-CoV-2 特异性 IgG 存在于唾液中而不存在于血清中。使用多种抗原检测法,可以计算出血清或唾液中至少两种抗原(S、RBD 或 N)的 IgG 流行率为 3.8%(95%CI:2.3%至 5.6%)。我们的研究显示了儿童中 SARS-CoV-2 抗体反应的异质性,并强调了唾液抗体检测和使用不同抗原的联合使用的额外价值。了解 SARS-CoV-2 的体液免疫,包括在儿童中,对于未来的公共卫生和疫苗策略至关重要。其他人认为,与循环抗体相比,黏膜抗体测量可能是评估体液免疫的重要且更方便的工具。然而,通常会检测血清抗体的流行率,而对黏膜抗体的关注较少。我们展示了 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的异质性,包括抗原特异性和循环抗体与黏膜抗体之间的差异,强调了除了检测血清中的抗体之外,还需要检测唾液中的抗体。