Institute of Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany.
Institute of Psychology, University of Trier, Trier, Germany.
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 15;16(9):e0257380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257380. eCollection 2021.
Several theories of hypnosis assume that responses to hypnotic suggestions are implemented through top-down modulations via a frontoparietal network that is involved in monitoring and cognitive control. The current study addressed this issue re-analyzing previously published event-related-potentials (ERP) (N1, P2, and P3b amplitudes) and combined it with source reconstruction and connectivity analysis methods. ERP data were obtained from participants engaged in a visual oddball paradigm composed of target, standard, and distractor stimuli during a hypnosis (HYP) and a control (CON) condition. In both conditions, participants were asked to count the rare targets presented on a video screen. During HYP participants received suggestions that a wooden board in front of their eyes would obstruct their view of the screen. The results showed that participants' counting accuracy was significantly impaired during HYP compared to CON. ERP components in the N1 and P2 window revealed no amplitude differences between CON and HYP at sensor-level. In contrast, P3b amplitudes in response to target stimuli were significantly reduced during HYP compared to CON. Source analysis of the P3b amplitudes in response to targets indicated that HYP was associated with reduced source activities in occipital and parietal brain areas related to stimulus categorization and attention. We further explored how these brain sources interacted by computing time-frequency effective connectivity between electrodes that best represented frontal, parietal, and occipital sources. This analysis revealed reduced directed information flow from parietal attentional to frontal executive sources during processing of target stimuli. These results provide preliminary evidence that hypnotic suggestions of a visual blockade are associated with a disruption of the coupling within the frontoparietal network implicated in top-down control.
几种催眠理论假设,对催眠暗示的反应是通过参与监测和认知控制的额顶网络进行自上而下的调制来实现的。本研究通过重新分析先前发表的事件相关电位(ERP)(N1、P2 和 P3b 幅度)并结合源重建和连接分析方法来解决这个问题。ERP 数据来自参与视觉Oddball 范式的参与者,该范式由目标、标准和分心刺激组成,在催眠(HYP)和对照(CON)条件下进行。在两种情况下,参与者都被要求在视频屏幕上数出罕见的目标。在 HYP 期间,参与者接受了暗示,即他们眼前的木板会挡住他们对屏幕的视线。结果表明,与 CON 相比,参与者在 HYP 期间的计数准确性明显下降。在传感器水平上,N1 和 P2 窗口中的 ERP 成分在 CON 和 HYP 之间没有显示出幅度差异。相比之下,与 CON 相比,HYP 期间对目标刺激的 P3b 幅度显著降低。对目标刺激的 P3b 幅度的源分析表明,与刺激分类和注意力相关的枕叶和顶叶脑区的源活动在 HYP 时明显减少。我们进一步通过计算最佳代表额、顶和枕叶源的电极之间的时频有效连接来探索这些脑源如何相互作用。该分析表明,在处理目标刺激时,来自顶叶注意力的定向信息流减少到额叶执行源。这些结果初步表明,视觉阻断的催眠暗示与涉及自上而下控制的额顶网络内的耦合中断有关。