• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荣誉意味着什么?医学院临床实习成绩的全国分析。

What Does Honors Mean? National Analysis of Medical School Clinical Clerkship Grading.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Irvine School of Medicine, University of California, Orange, California.

出版信息

J Surg Educ. 2022 Jan-Feb;79(1):157-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.08.022. Epub 2021 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.08.022
PMID:34526257
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) letters provide critical comparative information about clerkship performance, and are a crucial part of the surgical residency application. The elimination of USMLE Step 1 numeric reporting increases the importance of transparency, standardization, and accessibility of comparative information reported on the MSPE. The objective of our study was to measure the variability in clerkship grade reporting on the MSPE from US medical schools, particularly focusing on the highest (honors) grades.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We identified representative MSPE letters from US medical schools and recorded the percentage of honors for 5 core clerkships. We grouped medical schools according to medical school rankings, geographic region, and number of grading categories RESULTS: Of 122 medical schools, 106 schools (87%) reported their grading scheme and percent honors. The most commonly used grading scheme was a 4-tier system (51/122; 42%). The percentage of honors was highly variable (from 1-91%) and did not vary by region. However, schools in the top 20 research ranking were less likely to report grade comparisons (30% vs. 10%), and more likely to award more students honors in 4 of the 5 clerkships. Schools in the top 20 primary care ranking were more likely to award more honors in the medicine clerkship.

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant variability in the number of grading tiers used and the percentage of students awarded honors across US medical schools. Factors that correlated to higher grades included schools with higher rankings, and higher ranked schools were less likely to report comparative information at all.

摘要

目的

学生表现评估(MSPE)信提供了关于实习表现的关键比较信息,是外科住院医师申请的重要组成部分。USMLE 步骤 1 数字报告的消除增加了 MSPE 上报告的比较信息的透明度、标准化和可访问性的重要性。我们研究的目的是衡量美国医学院的 MSPE 成绩报告的变异性,特别是重点关注最高(荣誉)成绩。

设计、环境和参与者:我们从美国医学院确定了有代表性的 MSPE 信,并记录了 5 个核心实习的荣誉成绩百分比。我们根据医学院排名、地理位置和评分类别将医学院分组。

结果

在 122 所医学院中,有 106 所(87%)报告了他们的评分方案和荣誉成绩百分比。最常用的评分方案是 4 级系统(51/122;42%)。荣誉成绩百分比差异很大(从 1%到 91%),与地理位置无关。然而,排名前 20 的研究型学校更不可能报告成绩比较(30%对 10%),而且在 5 个实习中,有 4 个更有可能授予更多学生荣誉成绩。排名前 20 的初级保健排名的学校更有可能在医学实习中授予更多的荣誉成绩。

结论

美国医学院使用的评分层次数量和授予荣誉成绩的学生百分比存在显著差异。与更高成绩相关的因素包括排名较高的学校,而排名较高的学校更不可能报告所有比较信息。

相似文献

1
What Does Honors Mean? National Analysis of Medical School Clinical Clerkship Grading.荣誉意味着什么?医学院临床实习成绩的全国分析。
J Surg Educ. 2022 Jan-Feb;79(1):157-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.08.022. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
2
Step 1 is Pass/Fail, Now What? Can Clinical Clerkship Grades be Used as a Reliable Metric to Screen General Surgery Residency Applicants?步骤 1 是通过/失败,现在怎么办?临床实习成绩能否作为可靠指标筛选普通外科住院医师申请人?
J Surg Res. 2022 Nov;279:592-597. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.06.047. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
3
Evaluation of Medical School Grading Variability in the United States: Are All Honors the Same?美国医学院成绩变异性评估:所有荣誉都一样吗?
Acad Med. 2019 Dec;94(12):1939-1945. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002843.
4
The Current Status of Medical School Clerkship Grades in Residency Applicants.医学院实习成绩在住院医师申请人中的现状。
J Grad Med Educ. 2020 Apr;12(2):145-149. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00468.1.
5
Variation of surgery clerkship grades in US medical schools.美国医学院实习外科成绩的变化。
Am J Surg. 2019 Feb;217(2):329-334. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.09.024. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
6
Grading Practices and Distributions Across Internal Medicine Clerkships.内科实习期间的评分实践与分布情况
Teach Learn Med. 2016 Jul-Sep;28(3):286-92. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1164605. Epub 2016 May 4.
7
Is it appropriate to use core clerkship grades in the selection of residents?在住院医师选拔中使用核心临床实习成绩是否合适?
Curr Surg. 2006 Nov-Dec;63(6):391-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cursur.2006.06.012.
8
Variation and imprecision of clerkship grading in U.S. medical schools.美国医学院实习成绩的变异性和不精确性。
Acad Med. 2012 Aug;87(8):1070-6. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31825d0a2a.
9
Analysis of variability and trends in medical school clerkship grades.医学院临床实习成绩的变异性与趋势分析
Surg Open Sci. 2024 Mar 28;19:80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.03.010. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Identifying Meaningful Patterns of Internal Medicine Clerkship Grading Distributions: Application of Data Science Techniques Across 135 U.S. Medical Schools.识别内科实习成绩分布的有意义模式:数据科学技术在美国135所医学院校的应用
Acad Med. 2023 Mar 1;98(3):337-341. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005044. Epub 2023 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
A Rollercoaster of Grades Versus Growth in the Clerkship Year: A Phenomenological Study of Medical Student Experience with Competency Development.实习学年中成绩与成长的过山车之旅:一项关于医学生能力发展体验的现象学研究
Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Nov 25;13(1):592-601. doi: 10.5334/pme.1564. eCollection 2024.
2
Analysis of variability and trends in medical school clerkship grades.医学院临床实习成绩的变异性与趋势分析
Surg Open Sci. 2024 Mar 28;19:80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.03.010. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Expanding the Study of Bias in Medical Education Assessment.
拓展医学教育评估中的偏差研究
J Grad Med Educ. 2023 Dec;15(6):623-626. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-23-00027.1.
4
A Systematic Review of Metrics Utilized in the Selection and Prediction of Future Performance of Residents in the United States.美国住院医师未来表现选择和预测指标的系统评价
J Grad Med Educ. 2023 Dec;15(6):652-668. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00955.1.
5
The importance of USMLE step 2 on the screening and selection of applicants for general surgery residency positions.美国医师执照考试第二步(USMLE step 2)在普通外科住院医师职位申请人筛选和选拔中的重要性。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 27;9(7):e17486. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17486. eCollection 2023 Jul.