Vokes Jordan, Greenstein Alexander, Carmody Emily, Gorczyca John T
J Grad Med Educ. 2020 Apr;12(2):145-149. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00468.1.
Two criteria that have been investigated for evaluating orthopedic surgery residency candidates are achieving an "honors" grade during a surgery clerkship and the total number of honors grades received in all clerkships. Unfortunately, the rate of honors grades given and the criteria for earning an honors grade differ between medical schools, making comparison of applicants from different medical schools difficult.
We measured the rate of honors grades in clerkships at different medical schools in the United States to examine the utility of clerkship grades in evaluating orthopedic surgery residency applicants.
Adequate data via the Electronic Residency Application Service were available for 86 of 142 Association of American Medical Colleges medical schools from the 2017 Match cycle. Descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were performed to identify differences in grade distributions within each clerkship and in school ranking for research by .
For the surgery clerkship, the median rate of honors grades given was 32.5% (range 5%-67%). There was a high rate of interinstitutional variability in all clerkships. We were unable to demonstrate a statistically significant relationship between research ranking and percentage honors grades given for individual clerkships.
A standardized method for grading medical students during clinical clerkships does not exist, resulting in a high degree of interinstitutional variability. Surgery clerkship grades are an unreliable measure for comparing orthopedic surgery residency applicants from different medical schools. Standardized measures of applicant evaluation might be helpful in the future.
用于评估骨科手术住院医师培训候选人的两个标准是在外科实习期间获得“优秀”成绩以及在所有实习中获得的优秀成绩总数。不幸的是,不同医学院校给出优秀成绩的比例以及获得优秀成绩的标准存在差异,这使得比较来自不同医学院校的申请者变得困难。
我们测量了美国不同医学院校实习中优秀成绩的比例,以检验实习成绩在评估骨科手术住院医师培训申请者时的效用。
通过电子住院医师申请服务获得了2017年匹配周期中142所美国医学院校协会成员学校中86所学校的充分数据。进行了描述性统计和Wilcoxon秩和检验,以确定每个实习内成绩分布的差异以及按研究划分的学校排名差异。
对于外科实习,给出优秀成绩的中位数比例为32.5%(范围为5%-67%)。所有实习中机构间的变异性都很高。我们无法证明研究排名与单个实习给出的优秀成绩百分比之间存在统计学上的显著关系。
不存在用于在临床实习期间对医学生进行评分的标准化方法,导致机构间变异性很高。外科实习成绩是比较来自不同医学院校的骨科手术住院医师培训申请者的不可靠指标。未来标准化的申请者评估措施可能会有所帮助。