Park Se-Ju, Lee So-In, Jeong Ho-Jin, Kim Byeong-Geun
Department of Physical Therapy, Nambu University, Gwangju, Korea.
J Exerc Rehabil. 2021 Aug 23;17(4):226-233. doi: 10.12965/jer.2142322.161. eCollection 2021 Aug.
Professionals use foam rollers to improve range of motion (ROM). Recently, a vibrating foam roller (VFR) that combines the vibration function with a foam roller (FR) has been used. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effects of a VFR on the improvement of ROM in healthy individuals. A systematic literature search was carried out in five international databases: PubMed, Embase, PEDro, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Eight clinical studies, composed of six randomized controlled trials and two randomized crossover trials that involved 230 healthy participants were selected for analysis. Methodological quality was identified using the PEDro scale. The mean scores, 4.75±0.71, of the eight included studies, were classified as fair. The results demonstrated that the VFR achieved better gains than the FR in improving ROM (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.53; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 0.29-0.77; =55%). The VFR was more effective in improving the ROM than the FR in the hip and knee joints (hip: SMD, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.28-0.85; =0%; knee: SMD, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.42-1.30; =79%). The VFR may be an additional option to improve the ROM in healthy adults and athletes.
专业人士使用泡沫轴来改善关节活动范围(ROM)。最近,一种将振动功能与泡沫轴(FR)相结合的振动泡沫轴(VFR)已被使用。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是确定VFR对健康个体ROM改善的影响。在五个国际数据库中进行了系统的文献检索:PubMed、Embase、PEDro、Cochrane图书馆和谷歌学术。选择了八项临床研究进行分析,其中包括六项随机对照试验和两项随机交叉试验,涉及230名健康参与者。使用PEDro量表确定方法学质量。纳入的八项研究的平均得分4.75±0.71,被归类为中等。结果表明,在改善ROM方面,VFR比FR取得了更好的效果(标准化平均差[SMD],0.53;95%置信区间[CIs],0.29 - 0.77;P = 55%)。在改善髋关节和膝关节的ROM方面,VFR比FR更有效(髋关节:SMD,0.56;95% CI,0.28 - 0.85;P = 0%;膝关节:SMD,0.86;95% CI,0.42 - 1.30;P = 79%)。VFR可能是改善健康成年人和运动员ROM的另一种选择。