Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA.
State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Assessment. 2023 Jan;30(1):160-170. doi: 10.1177/10731911211045125. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
The Global Neuropsychological Assessment (GNA) is an extremely brief battery of cognitive tasks assessing episodic memory, processing speed, working memory, verbal fluency, executive function, and mood. It can be given in under 15 minutes, has five alternate forms, and does not require an examinee to be literate. The purpose of this study was to quantify practice effects over repeated administrations and assess comparability of the GNA's five alternate forms, preparing the battery for repeated administration in research and clinical settings. Forty participants each completed all five GNA forms at weekly intervals following a Latin square design (i.e., each form was administered at every position in the sequence an equal number of times). In a cognitively intact population, practice effects of 0.56 to 1.06 were observed across GNA measures when comparing the first and fifth administration. Most GNA tests showed nonsignificant interform differences with cross-form means differing by 0.35 or less, with the exception of modest but statistically significant interform differences for the GNA Story Memory subtest across all five forms. However, post hoc analysis identified clusters of two and three Story Memory alternate forms that were equivalent.
全球神经心理评估(GNA)是一种极简短的认知任务组合测验,评估情景记忆、加工速度、工作记忆、词语流畅性、执行功能和情绪。它可以在 15 分钟内完成,有五种备用形式,并且不需要被试具备读写能力。本研究的目的是量化多次测试中的练习效应,并评估 GNA 的五种备用形式的可比性,为研究和临床环境中的多次测试做好准备。40 名参与者每人都按照拉丁方设计(即,每种形式在序列中的每个位置的平均分配次数相等)在每周的间隔内完成所有五种 GNA 形式。在认知功能完整的人群中,当比较第一次和第五次测试时,GNA 各项测量的练习效应为 0.56 至 1.06。大多数 GNA 测试显示出无显著差异的跨形式均值差异,相差 0.35 或更小,除了 GNA 故事记忆子测验在所有五种形式上存在适度但具有统计学意义的跨形式差异。然而,事后分析确定了两个和三个故事记忆备用形式的等价聚类。