Suppr超能文献

采用两种不同化学方法获得高质量的病毒 RNA:一项性能比较研究。

Yielding quality viral RNA by using two different chemistries: a comparative performance study.

机构信息

Virus Research & Diagnostic Laboratory, ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

PRMMCH, Baripada, Odisha, Pandit Raghunath Murmu Medical College, Baripada, Odisha.

出版信息

Biotechniques. 2021 Oct;71(4):510-515. doi: 10.2144/btn-2021-0054. Epub 2021 Sep 16.

Abstract

Purity and integrity are two important criteria for any RNA extraction process to qualify the RNA for meaningful gene expression analysis. This study compares four commercially available RNA extraction kits using silica membrane and magnetic bead separation methods. The performance was evaluated in terms of both quantity (total RNA amount in μg/μl) and purity (260/280 ratio). The concentration and purity of each kit was significantly different from those of the others (p < 0.001). Although quantity obtained from Mag MAX is comparatively lower than QIAGEN, the quality is comparable as evident from real-time PCR performance. This study suggests that there are practical differences between these RNA extraction kits that should be taken into account while isolating RNA required for gene expression analysis.

摘要

纯度和完整性是任何 RNA 提取过程的两个重要标准,以确保 RNA 可用于有意义的基因表达分析。本研究比较了四种市售的 RNA 提取试剂盒,它们分别采用硅胶膜和磁珠分离方法。从数量(μg/μl 中的总 RNA 量)和纯度(260/280 比值)两个方面评估了性能。每个试剂盒的浓度和纯度与其他试剂盒显著不同(p<0.001)。尽管 Mag MAX 获得的量比 QIAGEN 低,但从实时 PCR 性能来看,质量相当。本研究表明,这些 RNA 提取试剂盒之间存在实际差异,在分离用于基因表达分析的 RNA 时应考虑这些差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验